Seepage carbonate mounds in Cenozoic sedimentary sequences from the Las Minas Basin, SE Spain M. Pozo a,⁎, J . P . C a l v o b, G. Scopelliti c, L. González-Acebrón d a Department of Geology and Geochemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049, Madrid, Spain b Department of Petrology and Geochemistry, Universidad Complutense, c/ Jose Antonio Novais 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain c Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, Palermo University, Via Archirafi 36, 90123, Palermo, Italy d Department of Stratigraphy, Universidad Complutense, c/ Jose Antonio Novais 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain of indu f the fa oreove d extens t is pres . Yet on itions of ositions and Pb ntrast to perature ent pac sected t Keywords: Carbonate mounds; Artesian groundwate 1. Introduction ⁎ Corresponding author. E-mail address: manuel.pozo@uam.es (M. Pozo). rate, strongly folded and/or brecciated calcite and dolomite beds occur interstratified in Cenozoic sedimentary a b s t r a c t A number of carbonate mounds composed sequences from the Las Minas Basin. Part o rock but showing contrasted lithification. M dolomite by calcite, calcite cementation, an mound de-posits. In some lithofacies, cher former replace the carbonate and infill voids growth pattern. The carbon isotope compos of −12.38 to 3.02 δ‰. Oxygen isotopic comp bric of the rock forming the carbonate mounds is composed of laminated to banded dolostone similar to the host r, the carbonate deposits of the mounds display aggrading neomorphism of dolomite, partial replacement of ive silicifi-cation, locally resulting in box-work fabric. Eight main lithofacies were distinguished in the carbonate ent as both microcrystalline to fibro-radial quartz and opal, the latter occurring mainly as cement whereas the e of the carbonate mounds shows distinctive petrography and geochemical features thus suggesting a distinctive calcite from the mound samples range from −11.56 to −5.15 δ‰ whilst do-lomite is depleted in 13C, with values vary from −9.42 to−4.64 δ‰ for calcite and between −6.68 and 8.19 δ‰ for dolomite. Carbonate in the mounds content, especially in the strongly deformed (F-2-2 lithofacies) and brecciated carbonate (F-4). The carbonate that determined in lutite. The formation of the carbonate mounds was related to local artesian seepage thermal s. Pressure differences between the low permeability host rock and the circulating fluids accounted for dilational kages, which combined with precipitation of new carbonate and silica mineral phases. Locally, some carbonate he lake floor, this resulting in bedded carbonate deposits composed of organic constituents. r Seepage; Chert; Cenozoic; SE Spain used to describe accumu- shows significant enrichment in Co, Cr, Ni deposits show depletion in REE and Y in co water flows of moderate to relative high tem fracturing and brecciation of the host sedim mounds developed where groundwater inter The term ‘carbonate mound’ is commonly lations of mineral carbonate matter characteriz ed by convex-up, dome- In this paper, a description and genetic interpretation of several car- like geometries (Wilson, 1975; Tucker and Wright, 1990). Recent and inas e not and ssion ut of their l and d by es in fossil carbonate mounds occur in a variety of geological situations in- cluding both continental and marine environments, subaerial and sub- aqueous conditions, and can form in water of any temperature. The composition and fabrics of carbonate mounds are varied, embracing carbonate skeletal and non-skeletal biogenic buildups as well as carbon-ate deposits mainly formed by inorganic processes (Riding, 2002). Mound springs constitute a particular case characterized by freshwater deposits of spring carbonates and/or clastic sediments associated with groundwater discharge (Pentecost, 2005; Linares et al., 2010; Keppel et al., 2011). Moreover, hot spring deposits composed of calcium car-bonate (travertine) and silica (siliceous sinter) lead to spectacular mound structures that witness existence of both recent and fossil geo-thermal systems (Renaut and Jones, 2000, 2003; Pentecost et al., 2003; Jones and Renaut, 2010). bonate and silica-rich mounds occurring in the central part of the Las M Basin, SE Spain is presented. A striking feature is that the mounds ar composed of calcified macro and/or microbiota, as it is usual in tufa travertine deposits (Pedley, 2009; Brasier, 2011; Fouke, 2011; see discu on the controversial use of these terms in Jones and Renaut, 2010) b indurate brecciated, folded and/or faulted host rock, which suggests that formation was mainly constrained by a combined effect of mechanica chemical processes. The carbonate mounds from the Las Minas Basin were first describe Calvo et al. (1995) who compared the mounds to some other occur-renc Spain and the Basin and Range region in western USA. The http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1016/j.sedgeo.2016.01.008&domain=pdf mailto:manuel.pozo@uam.es http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2016.01.008 www.elsevier.com/locate/sedgeo authors interpreted the mounds as a result of groundwater seepage at the subsurface linked to geothermal fluids related to volcanism in the basin, a model that should be ruled out according to new observations and mineralogical and geochemical insight. 1.1. Geological setting Las Minas Basin is the largest (ca 160 km2) of several Neogene con-tinental intra-mountainous basins located in the external side of the Betic Chain, the so-called Prebetic Zone, in SE Spain (Sanz de Galdeano and Vera, 1992; Van der Beek and Cloeting, 1992) ( Fig. 1). The basins formed as a result of extensional tectonics during the late Miocene (Calvo and Elízaga, 1994; Rodríguez-Pascua et al., 2003). The Las Minas Basin was filled by an up to 500 m thick sedimentary succession of lacustrine deposits that unconformably overlie Mesozoic terrigenous, evaporite and carbonate formations, as well as middle Mio- cene marine carbonate strata. The lowermost deposits cropping out in the Las Minas Basin are composed of resedimented beds from shallow lake carbonate platforms (Elízaga, 1994) and marlstone – limestone cy- cles representative of shoreface – foreshore subenvironments in the lake basin (Calvo et al., 2000) ( Fig. 2). The carbonate sequences are followed up by a rather monotonous succession of lutite, marlstone (locally paper-shale) and both detrital and chemically-precipitated gyp- sum beds that reaches up to 145 m thick in the central part of the basin (Ortí et al., 2014). Abundant authigenic native sulphur and dolomite occur within the marlstone and gypsum beds in some parts of the basin (Lindtke et al., 2011). The carbonate mounds occur interstratified in the lower part of a package of alternating laminated to banded marlstone and dolostone deposits that overlie the evaporite sequences (Fig. 2). Upwards in the succession, the alternating marlstone and carbonate deposits become progressively enriched in diatomaceous beds (Bellanca et al., 1989) and locally intercalate slump deposits. Elízaga (1994) suggested that the large-scale slump deposits at the uppermost part of the sequence (Fig. 2) were related to seismic activity associated with extrusive, potassium-rich lamproitic volcanism in the region (Fúster et al., 1967; Bellon et al., 1981). Recent work on the radiometric age of the lamproite rocks points to 7.65 ± 0.02 Ma (Ortí et al., 2014), which is in contrast to a K/Ar dating of 5.7 ± 0.3 Ma obtained by Bellon et al. (1981) but fits better dating (7.2 ± 0.4 Ma) by Nobel et al. (1981) (see also Playà and Gimeno, 2006). 2. Methods After analysis of photogrammetric aerial documents (standard and Google imagery) that allowed the identification of the mound structures Fig. 1. Location of the study area (boxed) in the Prebetic Zone (southeastern Spain), which is limited by major overthrusts within the Betic Ranges. Note that the study area is limited to the east by a N-S oriented strike-slip fault. Fig. 2. Composite lithostratigraphic log for the sedimentary infill of the Las Minas Basin (modified from Calvo et al., 2000); arrow indicates location of carbonate mounds. cropping out in the area, field work was focused on the description and sampling of four main carbonate mounds (see location on Fig. 3). Fifty two samples (Table 1) were collected from several parts of the mounds and the host rock sedimentary sequence. Rock samples were selected from different parts of the mounds in- cluding crest to distal slope transects. Finely polished slabs were t , , f r Fig. 3. Geological map of the Las Minas Basin showing the location of the studied carbonate mounds (modified from Ortí et al., 2014). prepared from all samples. Thin sections were stained for dolomite, ferroan calcite and ferroan dolomite using standard methods (Miller, 1988). Selected samples were examined under a scanning electron mi- croscope (Philips SEM XL-30, FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) after coating with gold (10 nm thick) in a sputtering chamber. Besides stan- dard petrography methods, the mineralogy for carbonates, chert and clays was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) of samples on a Siemens-5000 diffractometer with a scanning speed of 1° 2θ/min and Cu-Kα radiation (40 kV, 20 mA). XRD studies were carried out both on randomly oriented samples (bulk sample) and selected clay fraction samples (b2 μm). Powdered (b63 μm) whole-rock samples were scanned from 2° to 65° 2θ. Four clay fraction samples were prepared from suspensions oriented on glass slides. Identification of the clay frac- tion minerals was carried out on oriented air-dried samples, with ethyl- ene glycol solvation, and also after heating at 550 °C. The method of the mineral intensity factors (MIF) was applied to XRD peak intensity ratios normalized to 100% with calibration constants for the quantitative esti-mation of the mineral content (Chung, 1974). The mole percentage CaCO3 in the dolomite was calculated from the equation of Lumsden (1979) taking into account d-spacings based on Goldsmith and Graf (1958) and Goldsmith et al. (1961), and the ordering degree values esti- mated according to the I105/I110 ratios in dolomite (I2.54 Å/I2.40 Å) ( Table 2). Eight doubly polished thick sections (70 μm) were prepared without any heating and glued to frosted glass with cyanoacrilate for fluid inclu-sions study. After optical petrographic analysis of the sections, selected areas were cut and removed from the glass using acetone to prepare the wafers. The microthermometric study was performed on them using a Linkam THMSG-600 heating and freezing stage. The stage was calibrated with synthetic fluid inclusions, including triple point of CO2, melting point of H2O, and critical point of H2O. Melting point of H2O standards show that the accuracy for low-temperature measurements are better than ±0.1 °C. Liquid to vapour ratios have been determined in comparison with Sherperd et al. (1985) always at room temperature. Fluid inclusions measurements were only possible in calcite. Dolo- mite and quartz did not provide crystal mosaics showing fluid inclu- sions suitable for microthermometry due to small size of their crystals. Carbon and oxygen stable isotopes were measured in 45 bulk sam- ples and 12 sub-samples picked up from polished slabs (Table 3). Pow- ders were obtained by using a mechanical micro-sampling drill under a binocular microscope. The measurements were performed at the labo- ratories of the Interdepartmental Research Service (SIDI) of the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and at the Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e del Mare (DISTeM) of the Università degli Studi di Palermo. Carbon dioxide was evolved from each sample at 25 °C using 100%H3PO4. All samples were prepared and analysed at least in duplicate. The analytical precision is generally ± 0.10% for carbon and ± 0.15%for oxygen. Both oxygen and carbon values were initially reported in δ permil relative to Vienna.Pee.Dee Belemnite (VPDB). Seven samples of carbonate rock, 2 samples of lutite and one sample of the volcanic lamproite from Cerro del Monagrillo (Fig. 3) w e r e analysed to determine their trace element content and subsequently to evaluate the eventual chemical fingerprint of fluid inpu into the mounds (Tables 4, 5). The analysed trace elements include Pb Sr, Ba, rare earths (from La to Lu plus Y) and transition elements (Cr Co, Ni, V, Zn, Cu, Ti, Fe, Mn). The chemical analysis of major elements (lutites) was performed by means of the MagiX X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spec-trometer of PANanalytical. A varian 220-FS QU-106 atomic absortion (AA) spectrophotometer was used for the determination o sodium. Trace element concentrations were determined by inductively coupled plasma spectrometry (ICP-MS). Samples were analysed afte standard procedure by fusion and acid digestion (HF, HNO3 and HCl). 2.1. Carbonate mound description The carbonate mounds are located in the central part of the Las Minas Basin, 2 km north-west of the village of Las Minas (Fig. 3). The Table 1 Carbonate and lutite samples collected from carbonatemoundoutcrops of LasMinas Basin with indication of their lithology and mineralogical composition. Sample Lithology Phyllo Q Do Ca Mag Ha Gy Op MOHARQUE MOH-1-1 Dolostone X XXX X MOH-1-2 Lutite XXX X XX X MOH-1-3 Dolostone X XXX X MOH-1-4 Dolostone X XXX X X XX MOH-1-5 Silicified carbonate XX XXX MOH-1-6 Silicified carbonato XX X XXX MOH-1-7 Silicified carbonate X XXX XX XX MOH-1-8 Silicified carbonate XX XX XX MOH-1-11 Dolostone X X XXX X MOH-1-12 Dolostone X XXX XX X MOH-1-13 Limestone XX x XXX MOH-4-1 Dolostone X XXX X X MOH-4-2 Dolostone X XXX x MOH-4-3 Dolostone X XXX X X TOPMOH-1 Limestone X XX XXX TOPMOH-2 Silicified carbonate XX XXX TOPMOH-3 Limestone X XXX TOPMOH-4 Limestone X X XXX TOPMOH-5 Limestone X XXX TOPMOH-6 Limestone X X XXX MOH2-1 Limestone XXX X MOH2-2 Silicified carbonate XX XXX X MOH2-3 Lutite XXX X X JABA-1 Limestone X XXX X JABA-2 Limestone X XXX X JABA-3 Silicified carbonate XX XXX X JABA-4 Lutite XXX X X JABA-5 Lutite XXX X X JABA-OA Limestone XXX JABA-OB Limestone X XXX X JABA-OC Dolostone XXX X X JABA-OD Dolostone XXX X U-1 and U-2 MAE19-4 Dolostone X XXX MAE19-5 Dolostone X XXX MAE19-6 Silicified carbonate XX XXX MAE-19-3/4 PEL Limestone X X XXX MAE20-1 Silicified carbonate XX XX XXX MAE20-3 Dolomite X XXX X MAE20-4 Dolomite X XXX X MAECHERT-1 Silicified carbonate XX XXX X MAECHERT-2 Chert XX XX XXX MAESO MOH3-1 Dolostone x XXX X X MOH3-2 Dolostone x XXX X X MOH3-3 Dolostone x XXX X MMAESO-01 Dolostone x XXX MMAESO-02 Dolostone x XXX X MMAESO-03 Dolostone x XXX X MMAESO-04 Dolostone x XXX MMAESO-05 Dolostone XXX MMAESO-06 Dolostone x XXX X MMAESO-07 Dolostone XXX MMAESO-INY Dolostone XXX XXX (N50%), XXX (20–50), XX (10–20), X (b10%). Table 2 Values of the ordering degree (expressed as I2.54/I2.40) and % CaCO3 of dolomite in the car- bonate mound samples. Lithofacies codes for the carbonate mound deposits are given in the column at right. Sample I2.54/I2.40 % CaCO3 Lithofacies MOH-1-11 0.510 50.01 F1 MOH-4-2 0.513 50.34 F1 MOH-4-3 0.475 51.68 F1 MAE1-90-5 0.444 50.68 F1 MOH-1-3 0.470 50.01 F-2-1 JABA-1 0.509 49.68 F-2-1 MOH-1-1 0.502 50.01 F-2-2 MOH-1-4-2 0.609 49.68 F-2-2 MOH-1-4-3 0.540 50.01 F-2-2 MOH-1-12 0.523 50.34 F-2-2 MOH-4-1 A 0.357 50.01 F-2-2 MOH-4-1B 0.287 50.34 F-2-2 JABA-2 0.492 49.34 F-2-2 MAE-20-1 0.563 50.34 F-2-2 MAE-19-4 0.457 50.34 F-4 MOH-1-7 0.402 50.01 F-4 MAE-20-4 A 0.384 51.34 F-4 MAE-20-4B 0.461 51.01 F-4 JABA-0C 0.492 50.01 F-4 MOH-3-1 0.440 50.01 F-7 MOH-3-2 0.414 50.68 F-7 MOH-3-3 0.369 49.68 F-7 MMAESO-1 0.394 50.68 F-7 MMAESO-2 0.459 50.68 F-7 MMAESO-3 0.498 50.68 F-7 MMAESO-4 0.500 50.68 F-7 MMAESO-5 0.392 50.68 F-7 MMAESO-6 0.310 50.34 F-7 MMAESO-7 0.475 50.34 F-7 MMAESO-INY 0.677 50.01 F-8 best exposed mound is located in Moharque, where it is seen as a linear, ~210 m long, up to 15 m high, ~30 m wide ridge (Fig. 4A, B). The height of the mound was measured in the central part of the ridge (Fig. 4C, D). An investigation survey for sulphur deposits carried out by the mining company MINERSA in 1987 showed that a drill-hole placed at the top of the mound passed through a 13.50 m thick package of silicified lime-stone that overlies well-bedded organic-rich marlstone and carbonate deposits. The mound is included in an alternating marlstone and dolostone succession. The western margin of the mound is bounded by a NE–SW normal fault. The carbonate mound is disrupted by several small, NW–SE oriented normal faults (Fig. 4B). The vertical transition from the carbonate mound deposits to the overlying sequence is gradual but fast and the overlying marlstone beds dip up to 25°(Fig. 5A). Lateral change of the mound lithofacies into the encasing sed-imentary deposits is not visible at this point. The transition from host-rock to carbonate mound facies (Fig. 5B) is characterized by fast change of friable alternating thin dolostone and marlstone beds into massive indurate dolostone depicting extensive small-scale folds and fractures. The sequence evolves upwards into a thick package of apparently massive, highly indurate rock, which repre- sents the dominant lithofacies of the ridge. These rocks are mainly brownish grey carbonates and chert, the latter occurring as patches within the mound core. Interestingly, the lowermost part of the Moharque mound shows a carbonate body displaying convex-up geom- etry, this resulting in deformation of a metre-thick sequence of lutite, marlstone and carbonate beds representative of the host-rock (Fig. 5B).Lithofacies observation is locally difficult because of rock weathering although some surfaces contribute to highlight subtle differences in the distribution of the carbonate and chert lithofacies. The most typical car- bonate facies at outcrop scale consists of strongly deformed and breccia-like fabric, locally silicified thin carbonate beds (Fig. 5C). Abrupt changes from sub-horizontal beds into bundles of vertically oriented carbonate bands are seen in several places across the mound. Moreover, massive vuggy carbonate is a common lithofacies towards the upper part of the mound (Fig. 5D). Other mound occurrences are located at the left side of the Segura River (Fig. 3). The carbonate mound shown in Fig. 6 (marked U-1 in Table 3 Isotopic compositions (expressed as δ13C and δ18O values) of the carbonate mound sam- ples. Bulk samples are indicated in bold. Lithofacies codes for the carbonate mound de- posits are given in the column at right. Samples δ13C δ18O Lithofacies Dolomite MOH-1-11 −9.80 2.15 F-1 MOH-4-2 −7.26 6.96 F-1 MOH-4-3 −6.85 3.38 F-1 MAE-19-5 −7.52 6.01 F-1 MOH-1-3 −9.69 −0.79 F-2-1 JABA-1 −10.84 1.94 F-2-1 MOH-1-1 −9.50 −6.21 F-2-2 MOH 1-1 A −9.11 −3.52 F-2-2 MOH 1-1B −8.18 −1.66 F-2-2 MOH-1-4 −11.23 −6.68 F-2-2 MOH-1-12 −12.38 −5.91 F-2-2 MOH 1-12 (23) A −11.97 −4.31 F-2-2 MOH 1-12 (23) B −9.28 −2.60 F-2-2 JABA-2 −10.87 −1.45 F-2-2 JABA-3 −10.42 −5.86 F-2-2 MOH-4-1a −10.43 −6.13 F-2-2 MOH-4-1b −7.89 −0.55 F-2-2 MOH 1-4 (2) A −9.63 −3.49 F-2-2 MOH 1-4 (3) A −10.68 −5.03 F-2-2 MOH 1-4 (3) C −11.14 −5.80 F-2-2 MAE-20-1 −6.29 −4.64 F-2-2 MOH-1-6 −9.43 −5.15 F-4 MOH-1-7 −9.25 4.74 F-4 JABA-0C −9.34 −4.86 F-4 MAE-19-4 −8.74 8.19 F-4 MAE-20-4a −6.48 7.94 F-4 MAE-20-4b −7.98 6.34 F-4 MOH3-1 1.21 7.38 F-7 MOH3-2 3.02 7.38 F-7 MOH3-3 1.41 7.84 F-7 MMAESO-1 1.36 7.26 F-7 MMAESO-2 1.94 6.96 F-7 MMAESO-3 1.21 5.95 F-7 MMAESO-4 1.58 7.03 F-7 MMAESO-5 2.01 7.16 F-7 MMAESO-6 1.40 6.90 F-7 MMAESO-7 1.27 6.43 F-7 MMAESO-INY 0.49 −0.67 F-8 Calcite MOH 1-1 A −9.95 −6.13 F-2-2 MOH 1-1B −9.38 −6.00 F-2-2 MOH 1-1C −9.29 −5.12 F-2-2 MOH-1-12 −6.21 −7.74 F-2-2 MOH 1-12 (23) A −11.86 −5.73 F-2-2 MOH 1-12 (23) B −8.96 −7.27 F-2-2 MOH 1-4 (2) A −10.76 −6.66 F-4 MOH 1-4 (3) A −11.16 −6.57 F-4 MOH 1-4 (3) B −11.13 −6.35 F-4 MOH 1-4 (3) C −11.21 −6.42 F-4 MOH 1-4 (5) C −10.74 −5.84 F-4 MOH-1-5 −8.50 −8.90 F-4 MOH-1-6 −8.74 −8.54 F-4 MOH 1-6 (17) A −10.11 −6.94 F-4 MOH 1-6 (17) B −9.58 −6.16 F-4 MOH-1-7 −5.72 −5.51 F-4 MOH-1-8 −11.56 −9.42 F-4 JABA-0 A −5.67 −8.12 F-5 JABA-0B −4.74 −8.14 F-5 MOHTOP-1 −9.63 −6.93 F-5 MOHTOP-3 −8.53 −7.80 F-5 MOHTOP-4 −10.94 −8.73 F-5 MOHTOP-5 −10.22 −8.10 F-5 MOHTOP-6 −11.21 −8.73 F-5 MOH-1-13 −5.28 −8.47 F-6 MAE-19-3/4 PEL −4.94 −8.50 F-6 Fig. 3) is outstanding as it allows observation of both vertical and lateral relationships with the host rock composed of well-bedded marlstone and dolostone alternations. The outcrop of the carbonate mound is about 40 m long and up to 6 m thick. Except for the presence of somewhat more indurate carbonate beds at both bottom and top of the mound lithofacies, the contact between the mound and the enclosing deposits is sharp and can be clearly delineated (Fig. 6). Nor-mal faults can be recognized across the carbonate mound. Similar carbonate lithofacies occur as a small patch a few tens of metres from the carbonate mound described above (Fig. 3; t h e i n d u r a t e carbonate patch is labelled U-2). The mound is also interbedded within a marlstone and dolostone sequence. A main outstanding feature is that the carbonate mound is pervasively silicified. The Maeso mound (see location in Fig. 3) forms a ~ 320 m long, up to 10 m high, and ~40 m wide linear ridge. From west to east, a gradual change from strongly folded indurate carbonate into roughly stratified carbonate beds with intercalated gravel lenses can be recognized. The carbonate displays local staining by metallic (Fe–Mn) oxyhydroxides (Fig. 7A). The uppermost part of the mound is formed of well-exposed, decimetre-thick carbonate beds locally displaying gently dip-ping depositional cross beds composed of indurate carbonate breccia fragments (Fig. 7B). In contrast to the other mound occurrences in the area, the Maeso mound does not show evidence of silicification. 2.2. Petrography and mineralogy Six lithofacies (F-1 to F-6) were distinguished in the Moharque, U-1 and U-2 carbonate mounds. The Maeso mound exhibits distinct lithofacies (F7, F8) that will be shown later. The mineralogical composi- tion of the lithofacies is mostly carbonate (± silica phases) with the ex- ception of samples belonging to F-3, which are made-up of clay minerals (Table 1). Values of mole percentage CaCO3 and ordering de- gree in dolomite from lithofacies F-1, F-2 and F-4 are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 8. 2.2.1. Massive dolostone (F-1) This lithofacies occurs as cm-thick, massive white to yellowish car- bonate beds showing occasional fenestral voids and fabric disturbance probably related to burrowing. The texture is characterized by dolomicrite to dolomicrosparite groundmass where the crystal sizes are rarely b5 μm. Small bioclasts, i.e. ostracod shells and sponge spic-ules, together with glauconite grains occur scattered within the ground-mass. Besides dolomite the F-1 lithofacies contain small amount of quartz, mainly present as local chalcedonite infilling small voids, and Fe- oxyhydroxides. The order/disorder values of dolomite range from 0.513 to 0.444. In all cases the carbonate can be characterized as Ca-poor dolomites (%CaCO3 ranging from 51.68 to 50.01) (Table 2, Fig. 8). Some dolostone samples exhibit dark nodules (up to 500 μm in size) and/or bands with irregular boundaries (Fig. 9A). 2.2.2. Laminated dolostone (F-2) This lithofacies is characterized by packages of sub-millimetre-thick laminae of dolomicrite, which occur either horizontal (sub-lithofacies F-2-1) (Fig. 9B, C, D) or showing fabrics formed of gently to strongly folded microcrystalline dolomite laminae with local fracturing to small- scale faults (sub-lithofacies F-2-2) (Fig. 9E). In the latter sub-lithofacies, lamination is not well-defined as in F-2-1 and local thicken-ing of the folded laminae is usually recognized (Fig. 9F). Under the mi-croscope the individual laminae show changes in crystal size of the dolomite (from b5 μm t o 1 0 μm) forming couplets of densely to loosely packed crystals (Fig. 9C, D). Mineralogically, the dolomite of lithofacies F-2 shows a large variation of order/disorder values, ranging from 0.609 to 0.444. In all cases the carbonate can be characterized as Ca-poor dolomites (%CaCO3 ranging from 50.34 to 49.34) (Table 2). The differences in dolomite ordering between lithofacies F-2-1 and F-2-2 suggest the existence of at least two dolomite populations (Fig. 8). A distinctive generation of dolomite is composed of hypidiotopic mosaics of crystals reaching up to 50 μm (dolospar crystals) that usually contain micrite inclusions and show dirty appearance. Crystal size of the dolomite mosaics increases gradually from the dolomicrite masses so Table 4 Trace element geochemical composition (μg/g). Lithofacies Sample Cr Co Ni Cu Zn V Pb Fe Mn Ti Sr Ba F-2-1 MOH1-3 0.04 0.31 1.88 0.89 2.00 2.22 0.63 21.39 29.03 70.05 845.03 1.41 F-2-2 MOH1-1 0.21 0.50 2.70 1.59 3.11 3.80 0.71 90.84 28.48 153.15 687.17 1.83 F-2-2 MOH1-4 0.16 3.30 25.85 0.46 1.03 1.12 2.44 62.10 11.84 58.21 889.76 3.35 F-3 MOH-1-2 74.00 12.00 29.00 46.00 95.00 130.00 18.00 50,120.00 540.00 5480.00 265.00 208.00 F-3 MOH-2-3 54.00 22.00 36.00 38.00 73.00 99.00 12.00 50,270.00 590.00 5950.00 314.00 369.00 F-4 MOH1-5 0.12 1.63 11.39 0.20 0.57 0.23 1.65 6.63 22.17 11.88 276.09 1.20 F-4 MOH1-6 0.34 2.64 20.18 0.04 0.52 0.33 2.40 16.77 14.04 9.26 366.69 2.58 F-5 MOH-2-1 0.06 0.32 3.50 0.16 0.25 0.07 0.52 6.68 13.99 4.93 208.08 0.99 F-7 MOH-3-2 0.17 0.63 2.38 2.29 3.03 4.11 1.45 24.29 27.42 81.10 403.95 97.02 Vrock MOH-0 329.15 21.93 66.77 9.06 49.24 78.55 50.07 22,336.22 281.32 10,308.89 370.08 977.16 Lithofacies Sample Y La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu ΣREE + Y F-2-1 MOH1-3 1.55 1.29 2.04 0.29 1.18 0.23 0.06 0.26 0.04 0.24 0.05 0.14 0.02 0.14 0.02 7.55 F-2-2 MOH1-1 0.90 1.11 2.07 0.24 0.94 0.22 0.05 0.18 0.02 0.17 0.03 0.09 0.01 0.10 0.01 6.14 F-2-2 MOH1-4 0.67 0.62 2.03 0.10 0.35 0.07 0.03 0.09 0.01 0.10 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.09 0.02 4.27 F-3 MOH1-2 16.00 24.60 46.80 5.82 22.00 4.39 0.91 3.78 0.55 3.14 0.64 1.76 0.25 1.65 0.24 132.53 F-3 MOH2-3 15.4 24.00 41.00 5.39 19.60 3.82 0.79 3.35 0.49 2.93 0.57 1.68 0.25 1.59 0.23 121.09 F-4 MOH1-5 0.15 0.96 0.82 0.02 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.02 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.02 0 2.11 F-4 MOH1-6 0.48 0.90 0.25 0.04 0.11 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.10 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.09 0.01 2.18 F-7 MOH3-2 0.64 0.60 1.14 0.14 0.59 0.15 0.03 0.13 0.02 0.11 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.06 0.01 3.71 Vrock MOH-0 29.7 99.9 258.00 41.5 181.00 36.10 5.77 19.50 1.93 7.52 1.11 2.82 0.34 1.99 0.29 687.47 that they can be characterized as a product of aggrading neomorphism (Tucker and Wright, 1990). Moreover, fractures and cracks of the lithofacies F-2-2 are filled up of up to 500 μm, clean dolomite crystals. Silicification by opal is common in the carbonate; opal cementation is usually followed up by separate chalcedonite quartz cement. Where dolosparite is present, cementation by silica consists of mi- crocrystalline quartz mosaics filling pores that are locally followed by quartz overgrowths. 2.2.3. Laminated lutite (F-3) The lithofacies consists of dark brown laminated lutite showing local umber, iron-rich patches. The lutites occur as cm-thick beds intercalated with laminated dolostone of lithofacies F-2. The composition of the lutite is mainly formed of dioctahedral phyllosilicate (d(060) = 1.495 Å) (80%) and quartz (6–11%). The lutite deposits include small dolomite content (4–16%), some gypsum (b5%) and halite (b5%). Differences in the mineralogical assemblages forming the lutites were observed. These differences are coincident with the location of the lutite deposits. Thus, lutite in contact with strongly deformed car- bonates (association 1) shows XRD patterns distinctive from those in- tercalated with carbonates that were not related to mound growth processes (association 2) (Fig. 10). The main difference is presence of halite and higher dolomite content of the deformed lutites. Regarding clay mineralogy, association 1 shows predominance of illite and Na-saturated smectite with subordinated illite-smectite mixed layer Table 5 Normalized to sample MOH-1-3 trace element contents (μg/g). Lithofacies Sample Cr(N) Co(N) Ni(N) Cu(N) Zn(N) F-2-2 MOH1-1 5.19 1.62 1.44 1.79 1.55 F-2-2 MOH1-4 4.02 10.64 13.75 0.51 0.52 F-4 MOH1-5 2.89 5.25 6.06 0.22 0.29 F-4 MOH1-6 8.59 8.52 10.73 0.05 0.26 F-5 MOH-2-1 1.42 1.04 1.86 0.18 0.12 F-7 MOH-3-2 4.34 2.03 1.26 2.57 1.51 Lithofacies Sample Y(N) La(N) Ce(N) Pr(N) Nd(N) Sm(N) Eu F-2-2 MOH1-1 0.581 0.860 1.015 0.828 0.797 0.957 0 F-2-2 MOH1-4 0.432 0.481 0.995 0.345 0.297 0.304 0 F-3 MOH1-2 10.323 19.070 22.941 20.069 18.644 19.087 15 F-3 MOH2-3 9.935 18.605 20.098 18.586 16.610 16.609 13 F-4 MOH1-5 0.097 0.744 0.402 0.069 0.068 0.043 0 F-4 MOH1-6 0.310 0.698 0.123 0.138 0.093 0.130 0 F-7 MOH3-2 0.413 0.465 0.559 0.483 0.500 0.652 0 whereas association 2 shows similar content (~ 40%) of illite and smec- tite but higher presence of mixed-clay minerals and traces of kaolinite. The higher crystallinity of illite in association 1 is outstanding. The chemical analysis of the lutite supports the mineralogical re- sults. Thus, the high content in Al2O3-rich silicates (alumina content in the lutite reaches up to 11% whilst the percentage of K2O reaches up to 3%), corroborates the predominance of illite and smectite in clay minerals. Likewise, higher content in K (illite), Mg (dolomite) and Na (halite) was determined in the deformed lutites. Fe content of about 5% deals with phyllosilicates and the occurrence of Fe-oxyhydroxides as observed in hand samples. The formation of Fe-oxyhydroxides phases seems to be related to re-lease of iron from clay minerals. This is especially clear in samples rep-resentative of association 1 (Fig. 11). Taking into account the low content of dolomite and gypsum in this lithofacies the values of loss on ignition (22–35%) are mostly indicative of organic matter within the lutite deposits. 2.2.4. Dolomite-calcite microbreccia (F-4) The lithofacies consists of breccia fragments of various sizes com- posed of both laminated and massive dolomite (Fig. 12A, B). Voids are partly to totally infilled by calcite cement and chert (Fig. 12C, D). Fine crystalline dolomite mosaics are locally replaced by calcite. The order/disorder values of dolomite range from 0.492 to 0.384. In all cases the carbonate can be characterized as Ca-poor dolomites V(N) Pb(N) FeN() Mn(N) Ti(N) Sr(N) Ba(N) 1.71 1.12 4.25 0.98 2.19 0.81 1.30 0.50 3.88 2.90 0.41 0.83 1.05 2.38 0.10 2.61 0.31 0.76 0.17 0.33 0.85 0.15 3.80 0.78 0.48 0.13 0.43 1.83 0.03 0.82 0.31 0.48 0.07 0.25 0.70 1.85 2.30 1.14 0.94 1.16 0.48 68.81 (N) Gd(N) Tb(N) Dy(N) Ho(N) Er(N) Tm(N) Yb(N) Lu(N) .833 0.692 0.500 0.708 0.600 0.643 0.500 0.714 0.500 .500 0.346 0.250 0.417 0.400 0.429 0.500 0.643 1.000 .167 14.538 13.750 13.083 12.800 12.571 12.500 11.786 12.000 .167 12.885 12.250 12.208 11.400 12.000 12.500 11.357 11.500 .167 0.077 0.000 0.042 0.000 0.071 0.000 0.143 0.000 .167 0.192 0.250 0.417 0.600 0.429 0.500 0.643 0.500 .500 0.500 0.500 0.458 0.400 0.429 0.500 0.429 0.500 of s- n Fig. 4. Moharque mound features. (A) Aerial image of the Moharque carbonate mound (dashed line indicates contour of the mound). (B) Sketch (plan view) showing m a i n l i t h o f a c i e s forming the mound. (C) Cross-section sketch showing the distribution of mound lithofacies and their relationship with the associated sedimentary sequences. (D) View from the east of the Moharque mound; note sharp fault contact at right between the carbonate mound and lake evaporite facies. (%CaCO3 ranging from 51.34 to 50.01) (Table 2, Fig. 8). Chert occurs as both microcrystalline to fibro-radial quartz and opal, the latter oc- curring mainly as cement whereas the former replace the carbonate and infill voids. Moreover, the breccia fragments show spherulites formed of length slow quartz (quartzine) and mosaics of micro to mesocrystalline quartz replacing the dolomicrite laminae. The pore system of the breccias was tapered by later silicification consisting of length fast quartz (chalcedonite) alternating with opal cement. This feature reveals that silicification processes were largely developed through the formation of lithofacies F-4. 2.2.5. Breccia to boxwork-like calcite (F-5) The lithofacies is characterized by breccias of laminated and de- formed fragments of dolomite floating in mosaics of white coarse crys- talline calcite and silica cement that occlude centimetre-sized, rectilinear and irregular voids (Fig. 12E). Idiotopic aggregates of colum-nar calcite (Fig. 12F) are largely distributed in the breccias. The replace-ment of laminated dolomicrite fragments by calcite results in mosaics where anhedral calcite crystals range 100–150 μm in size. The calcite crystals are usually dirty due to presence of small (up to 20 μm) dolomicrite relics. Other calcite occurrence in this lithofacies consists of fibrous- radiaxial coarse crystalline fabrics reaching up 800 μm i n size. The resulting fabric closely resembles some boxwork dolomites described elsewhere (Swennen et al., 2012; Morrow, 2014). Chert oc-curring as both microcrystalline to fibro-radial quartz and opal is locally observed in this lithofacies. Microcrystalline quartz and quartzine rosettes (slow- length quartz) were precipitated first, affecting both the breccia fragments and columnar calcite. A later silicification process recognized from this lithofacies corresponds to precipitation of chalcedonite (fast- length quartz) and opal lining the pores. 2.2.6. Fibrous-radial calcite spherulites (F-6) This lithofacies occurs locally intercalated with calcite beds lithofacies 5 from which they are differentiated because of the fibrou radiaxial fabric of the calcite. This results in coalescing, 2–3 m m i diametre spherulites. 2.2.7. Dolostones from the Maeso carbonate mound (F-7, F-8) The carbonate lithofacies occurring in the Maeso mound show tex- tures that are clearly differentiated from those forming the Moharque, U-1 and U-2 mounds. At least two main carbonate types, all of them composed of dolomite, can be distinguished: F-7 lithofacies, in its turn sub-divided into F-7-1, F-7-2 and F-7-3 sub-lithofacies, and F-8 lithofacies. The latter one corresponds to a carbonate mass that crops out covered by metallic oxyhydroxides (Fig. 7A). The lithofacies is com- posed of tightly packed mosaic of rhombic to sub-rhombic dolomite crystals ranging 100–150 μm. The crystals are zoned exhibiting dark nu- cleus (Fig. 13A). In contrast, rock beds forming most of the Maeso mound (Fig. 7B) show a variety of carbonate fabrics (F-7-1, F-7-2, F-7-3) character- ized by abundant skeletal and/or organic constituents remains, i.e., bioclasts, peloids, intraclasts and laminated concretions (Fig. 13B to F). The differences among sub-lithofacies mainly deal with the clastic appearance, the amount of micrite matrix, and the development of lam- ination and/or banding, which suggests subtle variations in depositional conditions during growth of the carbonate mound. 2.2.8. Chert Quartz and opal occur irregularly distributed in the carbonate de- posits. Quartz is present either as micro to mesocrystalline quartz (Fig. 14A) or quartzine and chalcedonite (Fig. 14B). Except for lithofacies Fig. 5. Moharque mound. (A) Outcrop view of the southwestern part of the mound showing rapid transition (arrow, dashed line) into overlying marlstone beds. (B) Convex up geometry (solid line) of lithified and brecciated carbonate deforming marlstone and lutite deposits (arrow) which in turn change gradually upwards (dashed line) into deformed carbonates. (C) Outcrop view of folded to breccia-like, locally silicified (arrow) thin carbonate beds. (D) Massive carbonate showing abundant medium-size vugs towards the upper part of the ridge. Fig. 6. General view of the carbonate mound U-1 cropping out at the eastern margin of the Segura River (see Fig. 3 for location). Dashed line shows the contact between the mound and the host rock. Fig. 7. Maeso mound. (A) Outcrop view of indurate folded carbonate beds; note metallic grey shade due to Fe–Mn staining of the rock (arrow) at the base of the outcrop.(B) Indurate carbonate breccias showing gentle depositional cross-bedding (lithofacies F-8). F-1 and F-5, chert is present in the remaining carbonate lithofacies, which represent most of the total volume of the mounds. Absence or extremely low presence of chert in the Maeso carbonate mound (F-7 and F-8) will be discussed later. Quartz replaced carbonate and filled fractures, joints and other open porosity throughout the mounds. In contrast, opal occurs mainly as cementing phases usually as thin crusts of fibrous and/or globular opal lining voids (Fig. 14C, D). There is petrographic evidence of the forma- tion of opal-CT that evolved into microcrystalline quartz. Moreover, several silicification stages can be recognized, the main stage having Fig. 8. Diagram showing the distribution of dolomite samples on the basis of dolomite ordering and their %CaCO3 content; two populations (encircled) are distinguished. taken place after aggrading neomorphism of dolomite, partial replace-ment of dolomite by calcite and breccias development. 3. Geochemistry 3.1. Carbon and oxygen isotopes Both carbon and oxygen compositions of the carbonate samples col-lected in the mounds are listed in Table 3. The carbon isotope (δ13C) compositions of calcite from the mound samples range from −11.56 to −4.74 ‰ VPDB whilst dolomite is depleted in 13C, with values of δ13C ranging −12.38 to 3.02 ‰ VPDB. Oxygen isotopic compositions (δ18O) vary from −9.42 to −5.12 ‰ VPDB for calcite and between−6.68 and 8.19 ‰ VPDB for dolomite. Distinctively, dolostone samples from the Maeso site show heavy δ18O values (averaging 7.53 ‰ VPDB). In order to understand better and interpret the processes of forma- tion of the mounds, the carbon and oxygen compositions of the carbon- ate samples were represented in a δ18O–δ13C cross-plot (Fig. 15). According to their isotope compositions, the samples can be grouped in four main distinctive fields. Samples included in Group A correspond to dolostones showing lithofacies F-7 from the carbonate mound of Cortijo de Maeso. Samples plot closely in the diagram though their cor-relation coefficient is low (R2 = 0.096). The range of δ18O values does not exceed 2 ‰ VPDB whereas δ13C values are slightly more scattered but similar when compared to the other sample groups (Fig. 15). Only one carbonate sample collected in the Maeso mound (F-8) shows an erratic composition (δ13C = 0 . 4 9 ‰ VPDB; δ18O = −0.67 ‰ VPDB) and plots separately. All carbonate (dolomite) samples characterized as lithofacies F-1 plot in Group B. Samples representative of lithofacies F-2 plot mainly on Group C although some samples showing features characteristic of this lithofacies have distinct oxygen and carbon compositions; samples characterized as lithofacies F-2-1 have isotope compositions transitional from field B to C. As observed in the cross-plot (Fig. 15), samples includ-ed in these fields are representative of several carbonate lithofacies. Calcite samples representative of lithofacies F-4, F-5 and F-6 are plotted separately showing the most negative δ18O values and significant varia-tion of the isotopic carbon. Thus, the carbonate lithofacies distinguished can be consistently grouped according to their isotope carbon and oxygen compositions. The pattern shows an exception regarding carbonate samples of lithofacies F4, which display significant spread on the cross-plot dia- gram (Fig. 15). 3.2. Interpretation of carbon and oxygen isotope compositions The dolostones (lithofacies F-7) from the Cortijo de Maeso mound can be interpreted separately as they show quite distinctive isotopic compositions (Fig. 15). The clearly positive oxygen isotope values of this set of carbonate samples suggest precipitation under evaporative conditions. The positive δ13C values can be interpreted as a result of degassing, which selectively removes 12C and, to a minor extent, 16O from the water (Chafetz and Guidry, 2003). Only one carbonate sample (MMAESO-INY; Table 1), which consists of dense dolomite mosaics (lithofacies F-8) and interestingly shows metallic staining (Fig. 7A) dif- fers markedly from this pattern. We interpret that the dolostone stained by oxyhydroxides represents carbonate formed within the ground of the lake where no strong evaporative conditions were reached and the degassing effect was negligible. Both conditions are consistent with relatively depleted δ18O a n d δ13C values, respectively. The positive although variable oxygen compositions of the F-1 dolostones indicate precipitation in evaporated waters. The isotopic ox- ygen values are in the same range of the primary lake facies in which the carbonate mound was built (Ortí et al., 2014). The carbon composition of the F-1 dolostones is characterized by enrichment in light carbon, which can be interpreted as either a consequence of supply of soil ut s e e le te Fig. 9. Petrography of the mound lithofacies. (A) Banded massive dolostone (lithofacies F-1); note irregular boundary between light dolomicrite (lower part of the sample) and hard, yellowish dolomicrosparite. (B) Laminated, varve-like dolostone showing some enlarged pores between laminae (lithofacies F-2-1). (C) Photomicrograph showing alternation of dolomicrosparite (light) and dolomicrite (dark) laminae characteristic of lithofacies F-2-1 (XPL). (D) SEM-BSE photomicrograph showing homogeneous aggregate of minute euhedral dolomite crystals (lithofacies F-2-2). (E) Laminated dolomicrite showing local small folds and cracks filled with dolosparite (lithofacies F-2-2). (F) Dense dolomicrite to dolomicrosparite bands separated by coarse crystalline spar dolomite (lithofacies F-2-2) (XPL). organic carbon to the system (Gonfiantini, 1986; Bellanca et al., 1989) b can be also due to light CO2 sources related to thermal water sys-tem (Fouke et al., 2000; Minissale et al., 2002). In the latter case, pro-gressiv escape of isotopically light CO2 leads to low δ13C v a l u e s becaus of isotopic disequilibrium of fluids at the discharge point. This is a reliab explanation for the high content of light carbon in the mound dolomi occurring as F-1 and F-2 lithofacies. The carbonate samples characteristic of lithofacies F-1, F-2-1 and F- 2-2, in the latter case where isotopic determinations were carried out in the dolomite portion of the sample, show gradual variation from heavy to light oxygen compositions (Fig. 15). We interpret this variation as a result of progressive dilution of thermal water isolated from the evaporative lake environment. The negative oxygen values determined in calcites from samples showing lithofacies F-4, F-5 and F-6 could be matched with dilution and cooling of the hot water involved in the for- mation of the carbonate mounds. Moreover, texture relationships and results from fluid inclusion analysis (see discussion below) strongly suggest that calcite cements resulted from precipitation after meteoric water during telodiagenetic stages, probably after exhumation of the carbonate mounds. The similitude of negative carbon compositions shown by dolomite samples of groups B and C (Fig. 15) indicates that the source for carbon did not change during the development of the carbonate deposits forming the Moharque, U-1 and U-2 mounds. In contrast, calcites from lithofacies F-4, F-5 and F-6 show wide range of carbon isotopic compo-sitions, which points out to precipitation from meteoric water in an open diagenetic system. This would be consistent with growth of the mounds evolving in a confined system; under these conditions no sig-nificant variation of carbon composition by degassing will be produced (Minissale et al., 2002). The relatively low δ13C values of the F-2 dolo-mite can indicate some contribution from thermogenic hydrocarbons (Morrow, 2014). Fig. 10. X-ray diffraction patterns and chemical analyses from lutite of association 1 (sample MOH-1-2) and lutite of association 2 (sample MOH-2-3), which show the mineralogical differences between lutites related and not related, respectively, to the mound growth processes; note higher crystallinity of illite in association 1. F. phyllosilicates. G. Gypsum. Q. quartz. D. dolomite. A. anhydrite. B. basanite. H. halite. Fig. 11. SEM-BSE view of lutite. (A) Smectite aggregates showing crumpled morphology and low porosity (MOH-1-2). (B) Detail of A showing iron oxides inclusions (arrows). EDX: 40.14% Fe, 38.22% O, 10.15% Si, b5% Cl, Na, Al, Mg, S, K, Ca. 3.3. Trace element geochemistry The content in trace elements of the analysed carbonate, lutite and volcanic rocks is shown in Table 4. The highest concentrations were de- termined in the lamproite and the lutite samples. The carbonate de- posits show lower Co, Cr, Cu, Pb, Zn and V content (b5 μg/g) whereas concentration of Fe, Ni, Mn, Sr and Ti is higher. Barium content is very low (b4 μg/g) in the Moharque mound carbonate deposits but high in the Maeso carbonate rocks where Ba content reaches up to 97.02 μg/ g. This difference in Ba content was ratified by additional analyses (MMAESO-2, MMAESO-6 and MMAESO-INY samples) (Fig. 16A). In order to search for the chemical fingerprint of fluid input into the mounds an evaluation of the geochemical enrichment/depletion of trace elements in the carbonate and associated rocks was carried out. Normalization with a non-altered laminated sample (MOH-1-3; Table 5) was used as a reference for comparison. The abundance of nor- malized Mn and Fe is clearly visible (Fig. 16B). Fe content shows signif- icant depletion in carbonate facies F-4 and F-5, which are calcite-rich, whereas Mn content shows no variation irrespective of the carbonate facies. Regarding Ni, Co, Cr and Pb content, the strongly deformed (F-2-2 lithofacies) and brecciated carbonate (F-4) are neatly enriched in these elements. Moreover, detailed analysis of the trace element data (Table 5) points to some chemical differences related to texture. This is clear for sample MOH-1-1, composed of folded dolomite, which is close to the reference carbonate (Fig. 16C). A high positive correlation (R2 = 0 . 8 8 –0.98) among Co, Ni and Pb is recognized (Fig. 17A). Depletion of Cu, Zn, V, Ti and Sr is remarkable in carbonate samples of facies F-2, F-4 and F-5, especially where they are calcite- rich samples (Fig.16D). A very positive correlation among Cu, Zn and V was deter-mined (R2 = 0 . 9 2 –0.99), whilst Ti shows good correlation with Zn (R2 = 0 . 8 2 ) ( Fig. 17B) but moderate correlation with Fe and V. The Sr content is very low in calcite-rich samples and shows no correlation with all the aforementioned trace elements. With regard to REE, the higher values correspond to the volcanic lamproite (ΣREE N 650 μg/g) and the lutite samples (ΣREE = 121–132 μg/g) whilst ΣREE is lower than 10 μg/g in all carbonate facies, in particular those rich in calcite (Table 4). After normalization to the reference sample MOH-1-3, the Fig. 12. Petrography of the mound lithofacies. (A) Close-up view of breccia composed of laminated dolomicrite fragments and carbonate-silica crystalline mosaics (lithofacies F- 4). (B) Photomicrograph showing broken dolomicrite laminae releasing peloids (lithofacies F-4); left upper side of the picture shows quartz mosaics with scattered peloids (PPL). (C) Breccia composed of carbonate fragments (arrowed) and large masses of carbonate and opaline silica (lithofacies F-4). (D) Photomicrograph of dolomite fragments floating in an opaline (both globular and laminated) groundmass (lithofacies F-4) (PPL). (E) General view of lithofacies F-5 displaying large voids lined by dog-tooth calcite crystals (arrowed) and local silica cement. (F) Photomicrograph showing large calcite crystals (dog-tooth habit) rimmed by quartz, opal and chalcedony (lithofacies F-5) (XPL). carbonate facies show depletion in REE and Y, in contrast to that deter-mined in lutite (Table 5; Fig. 18A,B). 3.4. Interpretation of trace element geochemistry The breccia texture exhibited by facies F-2-2, F-4 and F-5 suggests input of fluid flows that can also explain dilution and/or mobilization of trace elements. Growth of new mineral phases such as calcite and chert probably resulted in dilution of trace element content as well as mobilization and further leaching of some of these elements, for in- stance, Cu, V, Ti, Sr and Zn. In view of the low mobility of REE, its depletion in carbonate might be also interpreted as a result of the dilution effect caused by growth of new mineral phases (calcite, chert). Enrichment in Ni, Co, Cr and Pb could be related to input of hydrothermal fluids of magmatic origin. The volcanic lamproites occurring in the basin can be considered as rep-resentative of the magmatic activity. 3.5. Fluid inclusions The microthermometry of FI was performed in non-ferroan calcite crystals from lithofacies F-4, F-5 and F-6 that usually limit open voids in the breccias displaying dog-tooth fabrics (Fig. 19A). Calcite crystals usually show dirty nuclei and clean boundaries where occurrence of elongate FI in the sense of growth is apparent (Fig. 19B), thus providing evidence of their primary nature. FI size ranges from 1 up to 48 μm (Table 6) although they are usually very small (b3 μm). The FI display irregular morphologies (Fig. 19B) with highly varied liquid to vapour ra- tios, from 90:10 to 60:40. This points out to heterogeneous entrapment. Final melting of ice temperatures (Tmice) r a n g e s b e t w e e n 0 a n d −3.3 °C Fig. 13. Petrography of the Maeso mound lithofacies. (A) Photomicrograph of planar-idiotopic to subidiotopic dolomite fabric displaying dark nucleus and limpid outer zones (lithofacies F- 8) (PPL). (B) Dolostone showing preserved grain-supported peloids and gastropod shells. The channel void shows a pore-lining of dolomite (lithofacies F-7-1) (PPL). (C) Banded dolomicrosparite showing micrite laminae and dolosparite mosaics with micrite inclusions (lithofacies F-7-2) (PPL). (D) Massive dolomicrite groundmass with spar-filled channels of organic appearance (lithofacies F-7-3) (XPL). (E) Void-filling spheroidal dolomite showing concentric lamination (lithofacies F-7) (XPL). (F) Laminated concretions rimming dolomite mosaics (lithofacies F-7) (PPL). (Table 6), the values close to 0 °C being most abundant; a minor popu- lation between −2.5 and −3.3 °C is related to the FI occurring close to the dirty nuclei of the calcite crystals (Fig. 19A and C). FI were cooled until liquid nitrogen temperatures but no other melting events different than ice were recorded. Eutectic temperatures are around −21 °C pointing to water–NaCl bearing system. Calculated salinities are be- tween fresh water and 5.41% w (NaCl-eq) (Table 6) ( Bodnar, 1993). The freshwater entrapment and the variable liquid to vapour ratios of the FI, the negative oxygen isotope values of calcite from lithofacies F-5 and F-6 (Fig. 15), and the textural evidence of this mineral as a last precipitate of the diagenetic sequence, altogether point to heteroge- neous entrapment under vadose conditions at temperatures lower than 50 °C (Goldstein and Reynolds, 1994). This strongly suggests that the calcite was formed during meteoric telodiagenesis. 3.6. Formation of the carbonate mounds The studied carbonate mounds occur discontinuous within a monot- onous lacustrine succession. On the basis of field observation it seems that the scattered mounds were formed at the same stratigraphic level coincident with the deposition of carbonate, mainly dolostone and marlstone deposits overlying evaporite gypsum and sulphur (Calvo and Elízaga, 1994; Ortí et al., 2014) ( Figs. 2, 3). A close relationship be- tween the mounds and some major faults in the basin is also recognized (Fig. 3). The convex-up morphology combined with the petrographic fea- tures shown by the carbonate mounds suggest a formation model where hydraulic discharge of groundwater is considered to have been the main triggering mechanism. Yet moderate to high temperature of the groundwater must be constrained in order to explain the mineralo- gy, facies and fabrics of the carbonate deposits. A distinction between two main mound types must be addressed according to the sedimenta- ry features displayed by the carbonate deposits of the Maeso mound and those from the Moharque, U-1 and U-2 mounds. The distinction deals with the groundwater flow pattern and the locations of the dis- charge points in the lake basin (Fig. 20). We interpret the carbonate mounds of the Las Minas Basin as thermal spring deposits related to me-dial fissures. However, only one of the 4 studied mounds, the Maeso Fig. 14. Chert petrography. (A) Moulds of microcrystalline quartz included in mesocrystalline quartz groundmass (lithofacies 4) (XPL). (B) Chalcedony (length fast) cement filling a void in opaline groundmass (lithofacies 4) (XPL). (C) Laminated opal rimming a void; the white central part of the picture consists of chalcedony cement (lithofacies 4) (PPL). (D) Close-up of globular opal with dark cores surrounded by chalcedony cement (lithofacies 4) (PPL). one, matches springs where thermal waters rise to the land surface, i.e. the lake floor. The rest of the mounds represent subsurface discharge, rather than interaction with the Las Minas lake water. The main lithofacies (F-1 to F-6) observed in the Moharque, U-1, U-2, and locally in the Maeso mound show two outstanding features in common: a) the host laminated dolomicrite is present as a major fabric constituent in the mound lithofacies, except in the breccias-like lithofacies F-5, and b) no organic remains, e.g. bioclasts, plants, bacterial and/or microbial structures, are clearly identified within the carbonate lithofacies. The latter feature is in contrast with that observed in lithofacies F-7, which forms most of the Maeso mound. Fig. 15. δ13C–δ18O cross-plot diagram representing the distribution of the carbonate lithofacies (encircled) can be differentiated; one sample corresponding to lithofacies F-8 plots clearly sepa A sequential order of precipitation can be established on the basis of field relations, petrography, mineralogical composition and isotope sys-tematics. Thus, in the Moharque mound (Fig. 4B, C) the carbonate de-posits showing lithofacies F-1 changes upwards into F-2 lithofacies and this in its turn changes into F-4. This stratigraphic relationship strongly suggests that the process progressed from bottom to top or from the inner to the outer part of the mound. This ran in parallel to the sequential order of mineral precipitation and their correlative tex-tures and/or fabrics that can be summarized as follows: - Host rock—dolomicrite (lithofacies F-1 and F-2-1) and lutite (lithofacies F-3) according to their isotopic composition. Four main groups of carbonate samples rated. Fig. 16. Trace element geochemistry. A. Ba content (non-normalized) distribution in Moharque and Maeso mounds. B. Fe, Mn and Sr concentrations normalized to MOH-1-3. C. Ni, Co, Pb and Cr concentrations normalized to MOH-1-3. D. Cu, Zn, V and Pb concentrations normalized to MOH-1-3. - Formation of dolomicroparite and dolosparite by aggrading neomorphism—induration/lithification - Fracturing and small-scale folding up resulting in breccias—lithofacies F-2-2 and F-4 Fig. 17. Correlation coefficients (R2) of trace elements. A. Bivariate plot of normalized Ni vs Co and Ni vs Pb. B. Bivariate plot of normalized Cu vs Zn and V vs Zn. - Precipitation of opal C-T and microcrystalline quartz as both cementa- tion and replacement of dolomicrite and/or dolosparite—lithofacies F-2-2 and F-4 - Precipitation of chalcedonite cement—lithofacies F-2-2 and F-4 - Replacement of dolomicrite and/or dolosparite mosaics by calcite—lithofacies F-4 Fig. 18. REE geochemistry. A. REE content normalized to MOH-1-3 in lutites and carbonates. B. Detail of REE distribution in carbonates. - c F cl th d a e ‘p 3 m th g in m d th s c s fl L i. m s b th Fig. 19. Photomicrographs of non-ferroan calcite. A. Non-ferroan calcite limiting an open void in the breccias showing dog-tooth texture. Notice that crystals present a dirty nuclei and cleaner boundaries (PPL). B. Detail of a primary FI (encircled) (PPL). C. Histogram of fluid inclusion final melting of ice temperature (Tmice). N: Number of measurements. C a l c i t e e m e n t a t i o n i n o p e n v o i d s —lithofacies -5 and F-6. This early indicates that cements of calcite mosaics postdate e dolomicrite masses and the dolosparite mosaics. A s i g n i ficant increase of porosity occurred through processes ealing with the formation of lithofacies F-1 to F-4. Calcite cementation nd probably the replacement of dolomite by calcite in telodiagenetic volu-tionary stages of the carbonate mound is envisaged as a assive’ process favoured by the large pore system. a fl c b c fo in ( w m p th .7. Carbonate mound growth model Field relations between the carbonate mounds and the host sedi- entary sequence suggest that much of their growth took place in e shallow subsurface. This is supported by doming or convex-up eometry of the Moharque and U-1 carbonate mounds resulting in clined structure of the surrounding and overlying dolostone and arlstone beds (Figs. 4, 6). The resulting structure is similar to that escribed by Nelson et al. (2001) from spring deposits related to e Pleistocene Lake Tecopa, SE California. Nelson et al. (2001) de- cribed stratabound ledges within lake sediments, the effect being onsidered as a kind of ‘inflation’ of the sediments occurring at ubsurface horizons as a result of fluids, i.e. thermal waters, owing along fault conduits. We interpret that the carbonate mounds currently exposed at the as Minas Basin could grow as linear ridges due to the alter-ation, e. lithification and sedimentary fabric distortion with asso-ciated ineralogical and geochemical changes, of the carbonate equence by thermal fluids moving lateral and vertical throughout the asinal faults (Fig. 20). Where groundwater reached the topog-raphy of e lake floor, carbonate deposits exhibiting sedimentary bedding nd bioclastic and organic remains constituents were accumulated. Several factors may have contributed to the rapid growth and in- ation of the mounds. Water flow seeping throughout the hosting arbonate sequence could strength the dolomicrite and marlstone eds, firstly producing lithification and then creating overpressure onditions in a confined setting. Under these conditions, brecciation llowed by mineral precipitation can reliably explain local volume crease. The process could be modelled similar to hydrofracturing Phillips, 1972) and dilatational brecciation (Swennen et al., 2012) hereby fluids injected into the host rock produce an array of shear icrofractures because of pressure differences between the low ermeability host rock, i.e. dolomicrite, and the fluids circulating along e fault system. A detailed description of the hydrofracturing g rn ct e g- e- et a s Table 6 Fluid inclusion measurements. FIA: Fluid inclusion assemblage (only when several cogenetic FI appear together), L:V: Liquid to vapour ratio. Tmice: F i n a l m e l t i n g o f i c e t e m - perature. Tn: Nucleation temperature. wt% (NaCl-eq): weight percent equivalent in NaCl. Sample FIA FI Size (μm) L:V Tmice (°C) Tn (°C) Salinity % w (NaCl-eq) MOH-1-13 1 20 95:5 −2.8 −42 4.65 2 26 95:5 −2.8 −47 4.65 3 22 95:5 −3.3/−2.8 −49 4.65–5.41 4 10 95:5 −0.2 −43 0.35 5 48 90:10 −0.2 −42 0.35 6 30 90:10 −0.4 −41 0.71 7 17 95:5 −1.5 −44 2.57 8 15 60:40 −0.4 −41 0.71 JABA-0B 1 22 90:10 0 −39 0.00 2 8 95:5 −0.2 0.35 3 11 90:10 0 −38 0.00 TOPMOH-5 1 1 18 85:15 0 −40 0.00 1 2 14 85:15 0 0.00 1 3 18 90:10 −0.2/0 −43 0.00–0.35 1 4 12 90:10 −0.2 −42 0.35 5 4 95:5 −1.5/−1.3 −43 2.24–2.57 2 6 6 80:20 −0.3 NO 0.53 2 7 9 70:30 −0.8 NO 1.40 MOH-2-1 1 10 95:5 −0.9 −42 1.57 2 6 95:5 −1.4/−1.3 −34 2.24–2.41 3 7 85:15 −0.1 −35 0.18 4 8 90:10 −0.3 −39 0.53 5 8 90:10 −0.5 −40 0.88 6 16 90:10 −2.6/−2.5 −44 4.18–4.34 mechanisms was provided by Swennen et al. (2012) by discussin dolomitization processes related to a main fault system in northe Spain. Several aspects dealing with cyclicity of fluids movement, ef-fe of fluid expulsion on changes in pore fluid pressure, cooling of th ascent of hot fluids leading to carbonate dissolution and/or fra mentation (Giles and de Boer, 1990; Davies, 2004), etcetera, d scribed for the formation of hydrothermal dolomites (Vandeginste al., 2005; Swennen et al., 2012; Morrow, 2014) c o u l d b e t o some extent applied to the growth of the carbonate mounds of the La Minas Basin. The ascending fluid flo w p a t t e r n w i t h i n m a n y p a r t s o f t h e m o u n d i s clearly indicated by the vertically banded carbonate (Fig. 4C). This out-standing feature occurs usually associated with the large pore space characteristic of the box-work fabric. Morrow (2014) described the latter fabric as a dissolutional, rather than dilational, evidence for the creation of pore space in hydrothermal dolomites. Being aware of the distinct geological setting, we consider that the boxwork-like fabric ob-served in the carbonate mounds of Las Minas can be concealed with the dilational and breccias-forming processes proposed for the formation of these deposits. 3.8. Fluid geochemistry and mineral precipitation Properties as temperature, enthalpy, and composition of the fluids contributing to the formation of the carbonate mounds can be deduced from the mineralogy of the precipitates and the geochemistry of carbonate and fluid inclusions. Again, distinction between the mounds interpreted as growing at subsurface (Moharque, U-1, U-2 mounds) and the Maeso carbonate mound, interpreted mostly as subaqueous deposits, is substantial. In the former case dolomite represents the altered host rock and the new mineral phases are calcite and silica; in the latter deposits cal-cite and dolomite are present with negligible amount of silica. It is noted that no aragonite was identified in any of the collected sam-ples, which is in agreement with that observed in many spring deposits though reasons for prevalence of calcite against aragonite remains unclear (Pentecost et al., 2003; Jones and Renaut, 2010). Silica precipitates can be used as an indicator of relatively hot water flowing throughout the basin faults (Jones and Renaut, 2010; Renaut et al., 2002). An alternative view of alkaline waters favouring precipitation of silica in the lake can be ruled out since it would be incompatible with gypsum precipitation (Ortí et al., 2014). Under hydrothermal conditions, silica supersaturated water inducing precipitation of quartz and/or opal is reached where the fluid approaches the surface. In the studied carbonate mounds supersaturation was probably favoured by brecciation of the lithified host rock; a combined effect of decompression and decrease of temperature in the brecciated carbonate could en-hance silica precipitation even though the fluid was not highly saturated in silica (Williams and Crerar, 1985; Knauth, 1992; Renaut et al., 2002). The carbonate host rock provided high alkaline conditions which together hydrothermal gradients favoured precipitation of opal CT and its further transformation into quartz. The presence of sulphates in underlying horizons of the basin sedimentary sequence could ac-count for the formation of length-slow chalcedonite. The composition and temperature of the fluids that formed the car- bonate mounds of Las Minas are uncertain. Insight from fluid inclusions was only searched in big calcite crystals that very probably represent late stages, so relative cooling conditions, of mineral precipitation. Un- fortunately no clear evidence from either recrystallized dolomite or quartz regarding temperature and/or composition of fluids could be obtained. 3.9. Concluding remarks The carbonate mounds studied in the Las Minas Basin are mostly composed of folded and/or brecciated dolomite beds similar to those forming the sedimentary sequences in which the mounds occur inter- stratified. This type of internal organization and fabric is clearly distinc- tive from the carbonate mounds usually described in the geological literature as they commonly show some kind of skeletal and/or biogenic structure, which is the case of tufa, travertine, mud-mound carbonates, and others. Moreover, the studied carbonate mound deposits display aggrading neomorphism of dolomite, partial replacement of dolomite by calcite, calcite cementation, and extensive silicification, locally resulting in boxwork fabric. These features point to predominance of physico- chemical and mechanical processes in building up the mounds. Table 7 summarizes the specific features shown by the mounds and their comparison to other types of carbonate mounds described in liter-ature. Lack of skeletal and/or organic remains within the mounds, ex-cept for the Maeso one, supports the specificity of their origin and development. It is concluded that formation of the carbonate mounds was related to local artesian seepage thermal water flows of moderate to relative high temperatures. This interpretation is supported by the distribution of carbonate lithofacies within the mounds as well as by the sequential arrangement of mineral precipitates. Pressure differences between the low permeability host rock and the circulating fluids accounted for dilational fracturing and brecciation of the host sediment packages, which combined with precipitation of new carbonate and silica mineral phases. Acknowledgments We are especially thankful to our colleagues and friends Adriana Bellanca and Rodolfo Neri with whom we shared nice field work campaigns and exchanged sound scientific discussions. The authors Fig. 20. Formation model for the carbonate mounds in Las Minas Basin. (A) Initial stage: sedimentation of evaporite and dolomite carbonate (including marlstone) deposits in a shallow lake (lithofacies F-1 and F-2-1). (B) Onset of carbonate mound growth by circulation of hydrothermal fluids through faults and sedimentary discontinuities resulting in lithification and slight folding and fracturing of the lacustrine deposit; development of F-2-2 lithofacies. (C) Extensive folding and brecciation accompanied of high silica input; formation of lithofacies F-4. Carbonate mound facies were locally accumulated on the lake floor (lithofacies F-7). (D) Final stage representative of sedimentation of dolomite marlstone and carbonate after ceasing hydrothermal water seepage. thank also María José Huertas (Universidad Complutense Madrid), Federico Ortí, Laura Rosell, Lluis Gibert, Elisabet Playà (Universidad de Barcelona), Jean-Marie Rouchy (Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris, CNRS), David Gómez-Gras (Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona), Pedro Alfaro (University of Alicante), Carlos Rossi (UC Madrid) and Miguel A. Rodríguez-Pascua (IGME) for encouraging discussions in both the field and the cabinet. The authors thank Dr. Brian Jones, Editor-in-Chief of Sedimentary Geology and two anonymous reviewers for their very encouraging and helpful com- ments that greatly improved an earlier version of the manuscript. Agustín Blanco is acknowledged for technical support drawing many illustrations shown in the paper. Pedro Lozano and Marian Barajas assisted in the preparation of thin sections and material deal- ing with fluid inclusion analysis. The scientific work is included with-in the research activities of the Research groups C-144 (UAM, Geomaterials and Geological Processes) and UCM-910607. e— s nch- - e s - - - Table 7 Comparison of sedimentary features and formation processes of carbonate mounds. Carbonate build ups (skeletal to mud mounds) (1,2) Seep mounds (3,4) Mound springs (5,6) Hot-water spring mounds (7,8) Seepage mounds (this study) Shape Commonly dome-shaped, pinnacles, rarely flat-shaped Dome-shaped, pinnacles Dome-shaped, pinnacles, rimstone dam-and-pool architecture Dome-shaped, rimstone dam-and-pool architecture Dome-shaped Structure, fabric & dominant mineralogy Organic framework, massive (carbonate mud-mounds) Framestonea, boundstonea, bafflestone a CaCO3 (low and high Mg-calcite and/or aragonite) Massive to clotted fabric, microbial build-up locally including invertebrate fossils Bindstonea, bafflestonea CaCO3 (high Mg-calcite and/or aragonite), dolomite, methane, clays In situ vegetation growth (cool-water tufa facies)—interfingering clastic sediment Boundstonea, bindstonea CaCO3 (low and high Mg-calcite, aragonite) Travertine-like (microbial build-up) associated with in situ vegetation growth Bindstonea, boundstonea CaCO3 (low and high Mg-calcite, aragonite) and chert (dominant in hyperthermal springs) Breccias-like structure combining strongly folded and fractured lithified beds Local box-work fabric Low-Mg calcite, dolomite and chert Main building-up processes Formation of resistant framework dealing with organic build up, accumulation of carbonate mud by trapping and baffling Fluid seepage along synsedimentary faults supplying alkaline thermogenic water Microbially-mediated carbonate precipitation Subaerial to subaqueous groundwater discharge. CaCO3 encrustation/precipitation within and around plants related to CO2 degassing Thermal waters discharge along relatively deep fissures. Pool and mound precipitation around spring vents. Variation of deposits with distance to spring Thermal groundwater discharge along faults resulting in fracturing and brecciation of subsurface strata pushed up by overpressure water Depositional environment Usually marine carbonate platforms, more rarely in lakes Usually deep-water marine environments (shelf, slope) Occasional occurrences in alkaline lakes Freshwater spring related environments Subaerial, more rarely below lake water level Fresh to saline water, thermal spring-related environments Subaerial, more rarely in shallow lake water Mound structures developed in a lake sedimentary sequence altered in depth Local association with springs References for carbonate mound types: (1) Wilson, 1975; (2) Tucker and Wright, 1990; (3) Schlager (2003); ( 4 ) Conti and Fontana (2005); ( 5 ) Linares et al. (2010); ( 6 ) Keppel et al.(2011); ( 7 ) Pentecost et al. (2003); ( 8 ) Jones and Renaut (2010). a Embry and Klovan (1971) terminology for carbonate textural types. References Bellanca, A., Calvo, J.P., Censi, P., Elizaga, E., Neri, R., 1989. Evolution of diatomit carbonate lacustrine cycles of Miocene age, Southeastern Spain: petrology and isotope geochemistry. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 59, 45–52. Bellon, H., Bizon, G., Calvo, J.P., Elizaga, E., Gaudant, J., López, N., 1981. Le volcan du Cerrodel Monagrillo (Prov. de Murcia): Âge absolu et correlation avec les sediments néogènes du Bassin d'Hellín (Espagne). Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences Paris, 2 sér 292, 1035–1038. Bodnar, R.J., 1993. Revised equation and table for determining the freezing point depres- sion of H2O–NaCl solutions. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 57, 683–684. Brasier, A.T., 2011. Searching for travertines, calcretes and speleothems in deep time: processes, appearances, predictions and the impact of plants. Earth-Science Review 104, 213–239. Calvo, J.P., Elízaga, E., 1994. In: Gierlowski-Kordesch, E., Kelts, K. (Eds.), The Cenajo and LasMinas—Camarillas basins (Miocene), southeastern SpainGlobal Geological Record of Lake Basins 1. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 319–324. Calvo, J.P., Gómez-Gras, D., Alonso-Zarza, A.M., Jiménez, S., 2000. Architecture of a be type carbonate lake margin and its relation to fluvially dominated deltas, Las Minas Basin, Upper Miocene, Spain. Journal of Sedimentary Research 70, 240–254. Calvo, J.P., Pozo, M., Jones, B.F., 1995. Preliminary report of seepage mound occurrences Spain. inComparison with carbonate mounds from the Amargosa Desert, western USA. Geogaceta 18, 67–70. Chafetz, H.S., Guidry, S.A., 2003. Deposition and diagenesis of Mammoth Hot Springs travertine, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 40, 1515–1529. Chung, F.H., 1974. Quantitative interpretation of X-ray diffraction patterns of mixtures. II. Adiabatic principle of X-ray diffraction analysis of mixtures. Journal of Applied Crys-tallography 7, 526–531. Conti, S., Fontana, D., 2005. Anatomy of seep carbonates: ancient examples from the Mio cene of the northern Apennines (Italy). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeo- ecology 227, 156–175. Davies, G.R., 2004. Hydrothermal (thermobaric) dolomitization: rock fabric and organic petrology support for emplacement under conditions of thermal transients, shear stress, high pore fluid pressure with abrupt pressure transients, hydrofracturing, ep- isodic rapid fluid flow, and instantaneous cementation by saddle dolomite. In: Davies, G.R., Packard, J., McAuley, R. (Eds.), Dolomite Seminar and Core Conference. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Calgary. Elízaga, E., 1994. Análisis de facies sedimentarias y petrología de los depósitos lacustres d edad Neógeno superior de la Zona Prebélica, Albacete, España. Instituto de Estudio Albacetenses, Albacete, Spain (216 pp.). Embry, A.F., Klovan, J.E., 1971. A Late Devonian reef tract on northeastern Banks Islands,Northwest territories. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 19, 730–781. Fouke, B.W., 2011. Hot-spring System Geobiology: abiotic and biotic influences on traver- tine formation at Mammoth Hot Springs, Yellowstone National Park, USA. Sedimen-tology 58, 170–219. Fouke, B.W., Farmer, J.D., Des Marais, D.J., Pratt, L., Sturchio, N.C., Burns, P.C., Discipulo, M.K., 2000. Depositional facies and aqueous-solid geochemistry of travertine- depositing hot spring (Angel terrace, Mammouth hot springs, Yellowstone National Park, USA). Journal of Sedimentary Research 70, 565–585. Fúster, J.M., Gastesi, P., Sagredo, J., Fermoso, J.L., 1967. Las rocas lamproíticas del sudeste de España. Estudios Geológicos 22, 35–69. Giles, M.R., de Boer, R.B., 1990. Origin and significance of redistributional secondary po- rosity. Marine and Petroleum Geology 7, 379–397. Goldsmith, J.R., Graf, D., Heard, H.C., 1961. Lattice constants of the calcium– magnesiumcarbonates. American Mineralogist 46, 453–457. Goldsmith, J.R., Graf, D.L., 1958. Relation between lattice constants and composition of the Ca–Mg carbonates. American Mineralogist 43, 84–101. Goldstein, R.H., Reynolds, T.J., 1994. Systematics of fluid inclusions in diagenetic minerals. SEPM Short Course 31 (192 pp.). Gonfiantini, R., 1986. Environmental isotopes in lake studies. In: Fritz, P., Fontes, J.Ch. (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Isotope Geochemistry, 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 113–168. Jones, B., Renaut, R.W., 2010. In: Alonso-Zarza, A.M., Tanner (Eds.), Calcareous spring de- posits in continental settingsDevelopm. in Sedimentology 61. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 177–224. Keppel, H.N., Clarke, J.D.A., Halihan, T., Love, A.J., Werner, A.D., 2011. Mound springs in the arid Lake Eyre South region of South Australia: a new depositional tufa model. Sedi mentary Geology 240, 55–70. Knauth, L.P., 1992. Origin and diagenesis of cherts: an isotopic perspective. In: Clauer, N., Chauthun, S. (Eds.), Isotopic Signatures and Sedimentary RecordsLecture Notes in Earth Sciences 43. Springer, pp. 123–152. Linares, R., Rosell, J., Roque, C., Gutierrez, F., 2010. Origin and evolution of tufa mounds re lated to artesian karstic springs in Isona area (Pyrenees, NE Spain). Geodinamica Acta 23, 129–150. Lindtke, J., Ziegenbalg, S.B., Bunner, B., Rouchy, J.M., Pierre, C., Peckmann, J., 2011. Authigenesis of native sulphur and dolomite in a lacustrine evaporitic setting (Hellín basin, Late Miocene, SE Spain). Geological Magazine 148, 655–669. Lumsden, D.N., 1979. Discrepancy between thin section and X-ray estimates of dolomite in limestone. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 49, 429–436. Miller, J., 1988. Microscopical techniques. I. Slices, slides, stains and peels. In: Tucker, M.E.(Ed.), Techniques in Sedimentology. Blackwell Sci, Oxford, pp. 86–107. Minissale, A., Kerrick, D.M., Magro, G., Murrell, M.T., Paladini, M., Rihs, S., Sturchio, N.C.,Tassi, F., Vaselli, O., 2002. Geochemistry of Quaternary Travertines in the Region North of Rome (Italy): Structural, Hydrologic and Paleoclimatic Implications. Earth Panet.Sci. letters 203 pp. 709–728. Morrow, D.W., 2014. Zebra and boxwork fabrics in hydrothermal dolomites of northern Canada: indicators for dilational fracturing, dissolution or in situ replacement? Sedi mentology 61, 915–951. Nelson,S.T.,Karlsson,H.R.,Paces,J.B.,Tingey,D.G., Paleohydrologic Ward,S.,Peters,M.T.,2001.record of spring deposits in and around Pleistocene pluvial Lake Tecopa, southeastern California. Geological Society of America Bulletin 113, 659–670. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0005 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0005 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0005 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf1010 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf1010 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf1010 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf1010 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0010 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0010 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0010 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0015 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0015 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0015 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0020 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0020 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0020 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0025 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0025 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0025 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0030 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0030 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0030 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0035 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0035 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0035 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0040 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0040 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0040 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0045 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0045 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0045 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0050 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0050 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0050 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0050 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0050 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0050 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0055 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0055 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0055 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0060 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0060 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0065 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0065 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0065 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0070 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0070 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0070 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0075 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0075 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0080 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0080 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0085 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0085 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0090 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0090 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0095 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0095 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0100 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0100 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0100 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0105 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0105 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0105 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0110 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0110 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0110 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0115 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0115 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0115 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0120 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0120 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0120 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0125 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0125 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0130 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0130 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0135 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0135 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0140 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0140 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0140 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0145 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0145 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0145 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0150 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0150 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0150 pic hot- xt Nobel, F.A., Ansriessen, P.A.M., Hebeda, P.H., Priem, H.N.A., Rondeel, E.H., 1981. Isoto dating of the postalpine neogene volcanism in the Betic cordilleras, Southern Spain. Geologie en Mijnbouw 60, 209–214. Ortí, F., Rosell, L., Gibert, L., Moragas, M., Playà, E., Inglès, M., Rouchy, J.M., Calvo, J.P.,Gimeno, D., 2014. Evaporite sedimentation in a tectonically active basin: the lacus-trine Las Minas Gypsum unit (Late Tortonian, SE Spain). Sedimentary Geology 311, 17–42. Pedley, H.M., 2009. Tufas and travertines of the Mediterranean region: a testing ground for freshwater carbonate concepts and developments. Sedimentology 56, 221–246. Pentecost, A., 2005. Travertine. Springer, Berlin. Pentecost, A., Jones, B., Renaut, R.W., 2003. What is a hot spring? Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 40, 1443–1446. Phillips, W.J., 1972. Hydraulic fracturing and mineralization. Journal of the Geological So- ciety of London 128, 337–359. Playà, E., Gimeno, D., 2006. Evaporite deposition and coeval volcanism in the Fortuna Basin (Neogene, Murcia, Spain). Sedimentary Geology 188-189, 205–219. Renaut, R.W., Jones, B., 2000. Microbial precipitates around continental hot springs and geysers. In: Riding, R.E., Awramik, S.M. (Eds.), Microbial Sediments. Springer, Berlin, pp. 187–195. Renaut, R.W., Jones, B., 2003. Sedimentology of hot spring systems. Canadian Journal Earth ofSciences 40, 1439–1738. Renaut, R.W., Morley, C.K., Jones, B., 2002. In: Renaut, R.W., Ashley, G.M. (Eds.), Fossil spring travertine in the Turkana Basin, northern Kenya: structure, facies, and genesisSedimentation in Continental Rifts 73. SEPM Special Publication, pp. 123–141. Riding, R., 2002. Structure and composition of organic reefs and carbonate mud mounds:concepts and categories. Earth-Science Reviews 58, 163–231. Rodríguez-Pascua, M.A., De Vicente, G., Calvo, J.P., Pérez-López, R., 2003. Similarities between recent seismic activity and paleoseismites during the late Miocene in the ex- ternal Betic Chain (Spain): relationship by ‘b’ value and the fractal dimension. Journal of Structural Geology 25, 749–763. Sanz de Galdeano, C., Vera, J.A., 1992. Stratigraphic record and palaeogeographical conte of the Neogene basins in the Betic Cordillera, Spain. Basin Research 4, 21–36. Schlager, W., 2003. Benthic carbonate factories of the Phanerozoic. International Journalof Earth Sciences 92, 445–464. Sherperd, T.J., Rankin, A.H., Alderton, D.H.M. 1985. A practical guide to fluid inclusion studies. Ed. Blakie, Glasgow and London, (239 pp.) Swennen, R., Dewit, J., Fierens, E., Muchez, P., Shah, M., Nader, F., Hunt, D., 2012. Multipledolomitization events along the Pozalagua Fault (Pozalagua Quarry, Basque-Cantabrian Basin, Northern Spain). Sedimentology 59, 1345–1374. Tucker, M.E., Wright, V.P., 1990. Carbonate Sedimentology. Blackwell Science, Oxford. Vandeginste, V., Swennen, R., Gleeson, S.A., Ellam, R.M., Osadetz, K., Roure, F., 2005. Zebradolomitization as a result of focused fluid flow in the Rocky Mountain Fold and Thrust Belt, Canada. Sedimentology 52, 1067–1095. Van der Beek, P.A., Cloeting, G., 1992. Lithospheric flexure and the tectonic evolution of the Betic Cordilleras (SE Spain). Tectonophysics 203, 325–344. Williams, L.A., Crerar, D.A., 1985. Silica diagenesis, II. General mechanisms. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 55, 312–321. Wilson, J.L., 1975. Carbonate Facies in Geologic History. Springer Verlag, Berlin. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0155 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0155 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0155 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0160 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0160 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0160 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0165 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0165 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0170 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0175 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0175 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf2175 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf2175 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0180 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0180 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0185 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0185 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0185 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0190 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0190 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0195 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0195 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0195 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0200 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0200 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0205 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0205 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0205 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0205 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0210 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0210 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0215 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0215 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0220 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0220 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0220 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0225 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0230 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0230 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0230 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0235 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0235 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0240 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0240 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0037-0738(16)00016-6/rf0245