SPATIALLY RESOLVED STAR FORMATION MAIN SEQUENCE OF GALAXIES IN THE CALIFA SURVEY M. Cano-Díaz 1 , S. F. Sánchez 1 , S. Zibetti 2 , Y. Ascasibar 3,4 , J. Bland-Hawthorn 5 , B. Ziegler 6 , R. M. González Delgado 7 , C. J. Walcher 8 , R. García-Benito 7 , D. Mast 9,10 , M. A. Mendoza-Pérez 7 , J. FalcÓn-Barroso 11,12 , L. Galbany 13,14 , B. Husemann 15 , C. Kehrig 7 , R. A. Marino 16,17 , P. Sánchez-Blázquez 3,18 , C. LÓpez-Cobá 1 , Á. R. LÓpez-Sánchez 19,20 , and J. M. Vilchez 7 1 Instituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-264, Mexico D.F., 04510, Mexico 2 INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo Enrico Fermi 5, I-50125 Firenze, Italy 3 Departamento de Física Teórica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain 4 Astro-UAM, UAM, Unidad Asociada CSIC, Spain 5 Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney,NSW 2006, Australia 6 Universität Wien, Institut für Astrophysik, Türkenschanzstraße 17, A-1180 Wien, Austria 7 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA-CSIC), Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n Aptdo. 3004, E-18008 Granada, Spain 8 Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany 9 Observatorio Astronómico, Laprida 854, X5000BGR, Córdoba, Argentina 10 Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la República Argentina, Avda. Rivadavia 1917, C1033AAJ, CABA, Argentina 11 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Vía Láctea s/n, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 12 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 13 Millennium Institute of Astrophysics MAS, Nuncio Monseñor Sótero Sanz 100, Providencia, 7500011 Santiago, Chile 14 Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile, Camino El Observatorio 1515, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile 15 European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, D-85748 Garching b. München, Germany 16 Departamentode Astrofísica y CC. de la Atmósfera, Facultad de CC. Físicas, UCM, Avda. Complutense s/n, E-28040 Madrid, Spain 17 Department of Physics, Institute for Astronomy, ETH Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland 18 Instituto de Astrofisíca, Facultad de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile 19 Australian Astronomical Observatory, P.O. Box 915, North Ryde, NSW 1670, Australia 20 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia Received 2015 September 17; accepted 2016 February 8; published 2016 April 19 ABSTRACT The “main sequence of galaxies”—defined in terms of the total star formation rate ψ versus the total stellar mass M*—is a well-studied tight relation that has been observed at several wavelengths and at different redshifts. All earlier studies have derived this relation from integrated properties of galaxies. We recover the same relation from an analysis of spatially resolved properties, with integral field spectroscopic (IFS) observations of 306 galaxies from the CALIFA survey. We consider the SFR surface density in units of log(Me yr−1 Kpc−2) and the stellar mass surface density in units of log(MeKpc−2) in individual spaxels thatprobe spatial scales of 0.5–1.5 Kpc. This local relation exhibits a high degree of correlation with small scatter (σ= 0.23 dex), irrespective of the dominant ionization source of the host galaxy or its integrated stellar mass. We highlight(i) the integrated star formation main sequence formed by galaxies whose dominant ionization process is related to star formation, for which we find a slope of 0.81± 0.02; (ii) forthe spatially resolved relation obtained with the spaxel analysis, we find a slope of 0.72± 0.04; and(iii) for the integrated main sequence, we alsoidentifieda sequence formed by galaxies that are dominated by an old stellar population, which we have called the retired galaxies sequence. Key words: galaxies: evolution – galaxies: fundamental parameters – galaxies: star formation 1. INTRODUCTION Thanks to the increasing number of statistical studies of both local and distant galaxies, it has been possible to reveal and confirm several correlations in extragalactic astronomy. One of these relations is the so-called star formation main sequence (SFMS) of actively star-forming galaxies, which relates the star formation rate (SFR, ψ) and the stellar mass (M*). The SFMS is an approximately linear correlation between log ψ and logM*that has been observed in the local universe as well as at high redshifts. See,for example,Brinchmann et al. (2004), Salim et al. (2007), andRenzini & Peng (2015,hereafter RP15) for z∼0;Peng et al. (2010) for z 1;and Daddi et al. (2007, hereafter D07) for z>1. In particular, Speagle et al. (2014, hereafter S14) performed a compilation of SFMS relations reported in the literature and showeda summary of the evolutionary behavior of the SFMS with redshift (up to z∼ 6). Katsianis et al. (2015) performed a similar study of the evolution of this correlation for z∼1–4. The SFMS is also recovered in cosmological simulations (Davé et al. 2011; Torrey et al. 2014; Sparre et al. 2015, hereafter S15). In fact, this correlation has been proven to be tight, with a scatter of ∼0.2–0.35 dex in observations and in theoretical predictions (D07; S15; S14). The values of the slope and zero points for the SFMS may vary within a large range in the literature (see S14 for a compilation). It has been proposed that thesevariations may originate from the selection criteria used to select star-forming galaxies. RP15 has proposed a new objective definition for the SFMS for local galaxies, which favors values of 0.76 dex and −7.64 log(Me yr−1) for the slope and zero points, respectively. Although the physical distinction between star-forming and passive galaxies is not straightforward (see, e.g., Casado et al. 2015), the SFMS correlation provides a convenient way to classify galaxies in terms of their SF properties. Generally, the star-forming galaxies lie on the main sequence, red elliptical galaxies tend to lie below the relation, while the starburst galaxieslie above the sequence (S15). The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 821:L26 (5pp), 2016 April 20 doi:10.3847/2041-8205/821/2/L26 © 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. 1 http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/821/2/L26 http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.3847/2041-8205/821/2/L26&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2016-04-19 http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.3847/2041-8205/821/2/L26&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2016-04-19 All previous SFMS studies have been doneusing integrated quantities for the galaxies. Due to observational restrictions, the derivation of quantities like SFR and M* have been performed using, for example, single fiber spectroscopy affected by aperture losses that need to be corrected. Integral field spectroscopy (IFS) allows usto have spatial and spectro- scopical information for extended objects, as it delivers individual spectra for each point of the observed target (restricted to the instrument spatial resolution), which makes IFS a suitable observational technique forstudyingspatially resolved physical quantities in galaxies. Studying the SFMS with IFS would allow usto obtain bothintegrated and local correlations. If the field of view covers the entire optical extension of the galaxy, these data are not affected by aperture loss. IFS, when used to perform sky surveys, allows usto performstatistical studies of spatially resolved physical quantities of galaxies. The Calar Alto Legacy Integral Field Area survey(CALIFA;Sánchez et al. 2012) is an ongoing extragalactic optical IFS surveydesigned to observe around 600 galaxies, which makes it suitable forperforming spatially resolved studies with statistical significance. We present the results of studying the spatially resolved SFMS based on data from the CALIFA survey. Throughout this paper, we have adopted a Salpeter IMF and a cosmology defined byH0= 71 km s−1 Mpc−1, ΩΛ= 0.7, and a flat universe. 2. DATA AND SAMPLE OF GALAXIES We used the available sample observed by CALIFA until 2015 February, consisting of 535 galaxies that are representa- tive of its mother sample (Walcher et al. 2014;mass and redshift ranges are 109.76 Å, meaning that the dominant ionization process in these galaxies comes from the nuclear activity. (ii) The blue symbols represent the galaxies that lie below the KL in the BPT diagram, and whose EW(Hα) are>6 Å, which means that the ionization processes in these galaxies are dominated by SF, asshown in Figure 3 of Sánchez et al. (2014). (iii) The red symbols account for galaxies whose EWs(Hα) are<3 Å regardless of their position in the BPT diagram, meaning that most of the dominant processes in the gas ionization probablycome from an old stellar population (Cid Fernandes et al. 2011). (iv) Finally, black symbols represent galaxies whose EWs(Hα) are 3 Å< EW< 6 Å, which means that their main ionization processes remain uncertain. Shaped symbols account for the galaxies from the low i subsample, which are the ones used for the rest of the analysis. For completeness, points show the galaxies for the complementary high i subsample. Althoughwe have transformed the Hα luminosities to SFRs for all the galaxies adopting the Kennicutt (1998) relation, we should clarify that the interpretation of SFRs is only valid for galaxies (and regions) that are ionized by young stars (following our previous criteria). For the rest of the galaxies, the SFRs presented in the plot are indeed just a linear transformation of the Hα luminosity. For the star-forming and retired galaxy sequences (blue and red, respectively), whichfrom now on will be referred to as SFMS and retired galaxysequence (RGS), we have fitted linear correlations between log(ψ) and log(M*), whose characteristics are listed in Table 1, along with their dispersions. The slope and zero point for the SFMS are in good agreement with the values reported in the literature for local galaxies (RP15, S14 and references therein;for further details,see Section 5). For the black and green points, no further analysis was performed due to the uncertain main ionization process of the gas and due to its poor statistics, respectively. The uncertainties of the derived quantities are dominated by the spectrophotometric accuracy of the CALIFA data, which is estimated to be ∼6% (García-Benito et al. 2015), as well as the details of the procedure followed to derive the M* and the SFRs. In the case of M*,it has been determined that the uncertainties are well constrained within a typical error of ∼0.15 dex(see, e.g., the discussion in Sánchez et al. 2013). The typical sizes of the uncertainties for our data areshown in Figure 1, which are consistent with what waspreviously found by Cid Fernandes et al. (2014) and Catalán-Torrecilla et al. (2015),and were taken into account when computing the linear fitting. 4.2. Spatially Resolved SFMS Relation Next, we explore the spatially resolved SFMS for the CALIFA sampleby plotting the SFR surface density versus the M* surface density in Figure 2. The individual spaxels used in constructing the relation have spatial scales of 0.5–1.5 kpc that are larger than typical H II region sizes (hundreds of parsecs;González Delgado & Pérez 1997). It was derived using only the spaxels that fulfill the same criteria as the blue points in Figure 1, irrespective of the location of its host galaxy in that figure. Indeed, 11% of the included spaxels comefrom galaxies for which the global ionization is not dominated by SF (i.e., not blue in Figure 1). A density plot of the local SFMS, based on 90,786 individual spectra, is shown in Figure 2. Colors account for the density of data points, and the yellow line represents a linear fitting to the correlation using only the 80% of the data, corresponding to the data contained inside the largest contour in the density plot thatcorresponds to the linear regime of the data. However, in Table 1,we present the results of the fitting using both100% and 80% of the data. The fitting was performed using variable mass bins thatindividually contain 1% of the total amount of data and shows that the spatially resolved SFMS relation holds in generalas a linear relation. Uncertainties in this plot are not shown, but were taken into account in the computation of the linear fitting and are reflected in the errors of the slope and zero point of the correlation. The spatially resolved SFMS proves to be a tight correlation, as the standard deviation (σ) is quite small σ= 0.23 dex, comparable to the value obtained for the integrated relation, in this work and previous independent studies (see, for example,D07; S14; S15). 5. DISCUSSION In Section 4.1,we explored the tight correlation between the SFR (inferred from Hα luminosity) and the total M* for star- forming (SFMS) and retired (RGS) galaxiesin logarithmic scales. In the case of the integrated SFMS the slope and zero point (see Table 1) are in good agreement with the previously reported values. Even if the range of variation of reported slopes and zero points in the literature may be as large as ∼0.4–1 for the slope and ∼−(4–10) for the zero points for local galaxies (S14), many recent works tend to constrain these Figure 1. Integrated M* vs. SFR relation for the CALIFA sample. Green symbols represent galaxies that lie above the Kewley limit (KL) and whose Hαequivalent widths (EWs) are >6 Å, i.e., are galaxies whose ionization emission is dominated by the AGN activity. Blue symbols represent galaxies below the KL and with EW(Hα) > 6 Å, and that have inclinations < 60°, i.e., that lie in the star formation main sequence (SFMS). Red symbols represent galaxies with EW(Hα) < 3 Å, i.e., that lie in a retired galaxies sequence (RGS). Finally, black symbols account for galaxies whose EW(Hα) lies between 3 and 6 Å, i.e., galaxies whose dominant ionization process is uncertain. Shaped symbols hold for galaxies in the low-inclination subsamplethat are the ones used for the rest of the analysis;however, for completeness, the points show the complementary high-inclination subsample. Blue and red lines are the linear fittings to the SFMS for low inclined galaxies and RGS,respectively (see Table 1 for details). SFRs shown in the plot only hold for the SF-dominated galaxies, for the rest these rates are only the result of the linear transformation of the Hα luminosities with the Kennicutt (1998) relation. For further details of the galaxy classifications, please refer to Section 4.1. 3 The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 821:L26 (5pp), 2016 April 20 Cano-Díaz et al. values to smaller ranges, such as 0.71–0.77 and −(6.78–7.64) (Elbaz et al. 2007; Zahid et al. 2012; RP15). Even more, published dispersions of this relation (∼0.2–0.35 dex)are in good agreement with the dispersion found with our data (0.20 dex). In Section 4.2,we presented the spatially resolved SFMS relation. The observed correlation holds on kiloparsec scalesand is consistent with the slope of 0.66± 0.18 reported by Sánchez et al. (2013) for H II regions. Comparing the integrated and the spatially resolved relations, our results (summarized in Table 1) indicate that not only the slopes, but also the intrinsic scatter, are roughly of the same order in both relations. We explored the local relation in different M* bins, finding that it has no dependence on this parameter. We fitted linear correlations to each mass bin relationand used a 2D Kolmogorv–Smirnov test to verify that the spatially resolved SFMS present the same distribution irrespective of the mass of the host galaxy;however, we will explore this in more detail in further works. We also explored the possible effects in the local SFMS determination, relaxing our criteria to select the SF regions by allowing the regions laying below the KL and whose EWs(Hα) are<3 to be considered also as SF regions. From this test, we found that for both relations, using the 100% and 80% of the data, the slope variesjust ∼0.04 dex, i.e., it has a little impact in our results. From a physical point of view, we know that SF is a local process, and therefore it is not unreasonable that the scaling relations governing it are local as well. The fact that the SFMS relation remains as a tight linear correlation on kiloparsecscales suggests that the conversion of gas into stars is mainly driven by local rather than global processes. A local SFMS could only be derived from the global one if the spatial distribution of both the μSFR and Σ* followed similar patterns in all galaxies. Given the variations in the shape and normalization of these observed profiles (e.g., González Delgado et al. 2015; R. M. González Delgado et al. 2016, in preparation), it seems rather fine-tuned that a mechanism acting on the scale of the whole galaxy affects both surface densities exactly in the way required to yield a universal relation on resolved scales without a local process being involved. To recover the global relation from the local one, we just need to integrate the resolved quantities across the whole area of the galaxy. In terms of the stellar mass surface density Σh at the half-light radius Rh, the total stellar mass should roughly scale as * µ SM Rh h 2. If the star formation surface density fulfills * m µ Sg SFR at every point (i.e., a local SFMS with logarithmic slope γ), one obtains the integrated relation *y µ S = Sg g-R Mh h h 2 1 . Since * S µ bMh with β∼0.5 (e.g., Kauffmann et al. 2003; González Delgado et al. 2015), the logarithmic slope of the integrated SFMS would be a g b= + - ~ - ´ =1 1 1 0.3 0.5 0.85 1( ) ( ) if it was a consequence of the local relation. If Equation (1) holds, α−γ= (1−β)(1−γ)>0 implies that the integrated SFMS should be slightly steeper than the local relation, in rough agreement with the results reported in Table 1. It must be noted, though, that this prediction is only valid if * µ SM Rh h 2, which is merely a first-order approximation. Moreover, the measured value of the logarithmic slope α is rather sensitive to the sample selection criteria (inclination, EW threshold, etc.), and we have to keep in mind that the galaxies used in the integrated relation, even if they were selected for being dominated by the SF activity, may contain local zones that are not starforming. 6. CONCLUSIONS We report the spatially resolved SFMS relation using IFS data from the CALIFA surveythat holds for kiloparsecscales. Our sample consists of galaxies of mixed morphological typesand masses that extend to three orders of magnitude. M* Table 1 Relevant Intrinsic Coefficients of the Integrated SFMS and RGS Relations and of the Spatially Resolved SFMS Relation, as Well as Those Derived by a Linear Regression Procedure to Each of Them Spatially Resolved SFMS Spatially Resolved SFMS Coefficient SFMS RGS 100% of the Data 80% of the Data Pearson Correlation Coeff. (ρ) 0.84 0.85 0.61 0.63 ρ99% Confidence Interval (0.76, 0.89) (0.77, 0.90) (0.60, 0.61) (0.62, 0.63) Slope 0.81 ± 0.02 0.86 ± 0.02 0.68 ± 0.04 0.72 ± 0.04 Zero Point −8.34 ± 0.19a −10.32 ± 0.24a −7.63 ± 0.34b −7.95 ± 0.29b Standard Deviation (σ) 0.20 0.22 0.23 0.16 Notes.The σ value is the deviation about the fitting. a Units: [log(Me yr−1)]. b Units: [log(Me yr−1 Kpc−2)]. Figure 2. Spatially resolved SFMS relation for the CALIFA samplethat holds for scales in the range of 0.5–1.5 kpc. Colors in the plot represent the amount of data points presented in this study. The outermost contour holds within itself80% of the total data presented in the plot. Further contours hold60%, 40%,and 20% of the total amount of data in the plot. Yellow line represents the linear fitting to the spatially resolved SFMS relation using the 80% of the data (see Table 1 for further details of the linear fitting). 4 The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 821:L26 (5pp), 2016 April 20 Cano-Díaz et al. have been derived from stellar population fits to optical spectra, and SFRs have been inferred from the extinction-corrected intensity of the Hα emission line. For an integrated SFR versus M* plot, we identified two main sequences, one accounts for the RGS and the other for the SFMS itself;for this last one,we report a slope of 0.81± 0.02 and a dispersion of 0.20 dex. For the star-forming areas in each galaxy, irrespectively of their integrated properties, we find a correlation between the μSFR and the Σ* that is as tight as the integrated one, and that seems to be the fundamental relation from which the global one is derived. For the local SFMS, we found a slope of 0.72± 0.04 and a dispersion of 0.23 dex. In future articles, we will explore the possible dependence of this relation on other properties of the galaxies, like morphology, color, environment, etc., as well as the derivation of the spatially resolved RGS We acknowledge the referee, E. Pérez, and R. Cid Fernandes for their comments. Financial support: M.C.D. and S.F.S.: DGAPA-UNAM funding; CONACyT-180125 and PAPIIT IA- 100815 projects. Z.S.: EU Marie Curie Career Integration Grant ”SteMaGE” PCIG12-GA-2012-326466. Y.A.: RyC- 2011-09461 and AYA2013-47742-C4-3-P projects from the Spanish MINECO and the SELGIFS programme, funded by the EU (FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IRSES-612701). C.J.W.: Marie Curie Career Integration Grant 303912. R.M.G.D.: AyA2014- 57490-P and J.A. P12-FQM2828 grants. J.F.B.: AYA2013- 48226-C3-1-P from the Spanish MINECO grant. L.G.: Millennium Science Initiative through grant IC120009, and by CONICYT through FONDECYT grant 3140566. REFERENCES Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5 Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, et al. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1151 Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245 Casado, J., Ascasibar, Y., Gavilán, M., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 888 Catalán-Torrecilla, C., Gil de Paz, A., Castillo-Morales, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A87 Cid Fernandes, R., González Delgado, R. M., García Benito, R., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, A130 Cid Fernandes, R., Pérez, E., García Benito, R., et al. 2013, A&A, 557, A86 Cid Fernandes, R., Stasińska, G., Mateus, A., & Vale Asari, N. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1687 Daddi, E., Dickinson, M., Morrison, G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 156 Davé, R., Oppenheimer, B. D., & Finlator, K. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 11 Elbaz, D., Daddi, E., Le Borgne, D., et al. 2007, A&A, 468, 33 García-Benito, R., Zibetti, S., Sánchez, S. F., et al. 2015, A&A, 576, A135 González Delgado, R. M., & Pérez, E. 1997, ApJS, 108, 199 González Delgado, R. M., Cid Fernandes, R., García Benito, R., et al. 2014, ApJL, 791, L16 González Delgado, R. M., García-Benito, R., Pérez, E., et al. 2015, A&A, 581, A103 Katsianis, A., Tescari, E., & Wyithe, J. S. B. 2015, arXiv:1508.01615 Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., White, S. D. M., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 54 Kelz, A., Verheijen, M. A. W., Roth, M. M., et al. 2006, PASP, 118, 129 Kennicutt, R. C., Jr. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189 Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., et al. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121 Peng, Y.-j., Lilly, S. J., Kovač, K., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 193 Pérez, E., Cid Fernandes, R., González Delgado, R. M., et al. 2013, ApJL, 764, L1 Renzini, A., & Peng, Y.-J. 2015, ApJL, 801, L29 Roth, M. M., Kelz, A., Fechner, T., et al. 2005, PASP, 117, 620 Salim, S., Rich, R. M., Charlot, S., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 267 Sánchez, S. F., Kennicutt, R. C., Gil de Paz, A., et al. 2012, A&A, 538, AA8 Sánchez, S. F., Pérez, E., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., et al. 2015, RMxAA, in press (arXiv:1509.08552) Sánchez, S. F., Pérez, E., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., et al. 2016, RMxAA, in press (arXiv:1602.01830) Sánchez, S. F., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., Jungwiert, B., et al. 2013, A&A, 554, A58 Sánchez, S. F., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., Iglesias-Páramo, J., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, A49 Sparre, M., Hayward, C. C., Springel, V., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 3548 Speagle, J. S., Steinhardt, C. L., Capak, P. L., & Silverman, J. D. 2014, ApJS, 214, 15 Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Genel, S., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 1985 Walcher, C. J., Wisotzki, L., Bekeraité, S., et al. 2014, A&A, 537, A1 Zahid, H. J., Dima, G. I., Kewley, L. J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 757, 54 5 The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 821:L26 (5pp), 2016 April 20 Cano-Díaz et al. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/130766 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981PASP...93....5B http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07881.x http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.351.1151B http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/167900 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...345..245C http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv949 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451..888C http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526023 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A%26A...584A..87C http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A%26A...584A..87C http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321692 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...561A.130C http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220616 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...557A..86C http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18244.x http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.413.1687C http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.413.1687C http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/521818 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...670..156D http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18680.x http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.415...11D http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077525 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...468...33E http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425080 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...576A.135G http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/312950 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJS..108..199G http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/791/1/L16 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...791L..16G http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525938 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...581A.103G http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...581A.103G http://arXiv.org/abs/1508.01615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06292.x http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.341...54K http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.341...54K http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/497455 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006PASP..118..129K http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ARA&A..36..189K http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/321545 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...556..121K http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/193 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...721..193P http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/764/1/L1 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764L...1P http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764L...1P http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/801/2/L29 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...801L..29R http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/429877 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005PASP..117..620R http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/519218 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..173..267S http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117353 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...538A...8S http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...538A...8S http://arXiv.org/abs/1509.08552 http://arXiv.org/abs/1602.01830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220669 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...554A..58S http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...554A..58S http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322343 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...563A..49S http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...563A..49S http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2713 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.447.3548S http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..214...15S http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..214...15S http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2295 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438.1985T http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424198 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...569A...1W http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/54 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757...54Z 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DATA AND SAMPLE OF GALAXIES 3. SFRs AND STELLAR MASS CALCULATION 4. RESULTS 4.1. Integrated SFMS Relation 4.2. Spatially Resolved SFMS Relation 5. DISCUSSION 6. CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES