Detrital zircon ages of Neoproterozoic sequences of the Moroccan Anti-Atlas belt ]acobo Abati a,. , Abdel Mohsine Aghzer b, 1 , Axel Gerdes c,2 , Nasser Ennih b • Departamento de Petrologfa y Geoquimica and Instituto de Geologia Econ6mica, Universidad Complutense/Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, 28040 Madrid, Spain b Departament Ge%gie. Faculte des Sciences, Universite Chouaib Doukkali, EIJadida. Morocco c Institutftir Geowissenschaften. Minera/ogie, Goethe-University Frankfurt (GUF),Altenhoferallee 1. D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Gennany Keywords: Anti-Atlas belt Morocco Detrital zircon U-Pb 1. Introduction ABSTRACT Detrital zircon dating from Neoproterozoic success ions in the Sirwa inlier oftheAnti-Atlas belt in Morocco confirms that the maximum depositionai age of the main stratigraphic groups is significantly younger than has been previously proposed in lithostratigraphic correlations. This can probably be extended to the whole Anti-Atlas according to other recent data from the Saghro inlier. Although the relative stratigraphic position of the different units remains valid as published previously, a crucial implication of the new ages is that the sequences believed to be contemporaneous with oceanic crust and island arc formation during the rifting and break-up of the northern margin of the West African Craton (WAC), and believed to be involved in the first phases of the Pan-African orogeny, are actually late to post­ orogenic. The age of the main deformation associated with the collision of the oceanic- and arc-derived terranes to the WAC, allegedly affecting the sediments of the Saghro Group, has been estimated at around 663-640 Ma. However, the youngest zircon populations of sediments of the Saghro and Bou Salda Groups, obtained in this study, cluster around 620-61 0 Ma, constraining the maximum age of deposition. This age of sedimentation is indistinguishable from the age of intrusive high-K cale-alkaline plutons of the Assarag Sui te, sugges ting a very rapid cycle of magmatism, relief formation, erosion and sedimentation in an active geodynamic scenario. Moreover, the proportion of the 61 0 Ma detrital zircons becomes less with respect to the Paleoproterozoic zircons at higher stratigraphic levels, suggesting that the source of young zircons was progressively eroded and more extensive cratonic areas, that probably underlie the Neoproterozoic rocks, were exposed. We interpret these data in terms of the development of a ca. 610 Ma magmatic arc, built upon WAC basement, and its progressive dismantling. This arc can be correlated with the voluminous late Neoproterozoic (ca. 640-570 Ma) arc magmatism characteristic of the north Gondwana margin and the peri-Gondwanan terranes. The diamictite beds that appear in the Imghi Formation of the Saghro Group have been correlated with the Sturtianglacial period ca. 700 Ma. However, zircons from one sample of these diamictites indicate that this correlation cannot be longer maintained, and instead they should be correlated with the Marinoan glacial period ca. 630-610 Ma, with a widespread distribution of glaciogenic deposits in West Africa. In addition, around 375 U-Pb concordant analyses obtained from Paleoproterozoic zircons from six samples represent a statistically significant population of this area of the WAC basement, which can be a useful database for comparison with the detrital zircon populations of the peri-Gondwanan terranes of Europe and North America, as the WAC margins were one of the major sediment suppliers for these terranes. Determining the age of statistically meaningful JXJpulations of detrital zircons within clastic sedimentary rocks has proven to be a powerful method to obtain relevant information on the nature of the crustal elements in the source region. This information has helped to resolve paleogeographic positions and geodynamic realms of terranes and paleocontinents by comparing the ages of the sediment provenance areas with the zircon signature of the stable cratonic areas of old continents or with the age of character­ istic tectono-metamorphic events. Recently, detrital zircon spectra have been widely used in the paleogeographic reconstruction of the Neoproterozoic margin of north Gondwana and the complex ensemble ofterranes which originated around this margin (Fig. 1 ); the peri-Gondwanan terranes (e.g. Fernandez-Suarez et al., 2002, 2003; Avigad et al., 2003; Murphy et al., 2004; Linnemann et al., C~ oon1\an active , ... , •• 1 •• :··)······ 3.1-3.4 (Ga) Ca. 570 Ma 0.55-0.85 1.1 -1.5 1.6-2.5 \ 1.65-1.85 2.6-3.1 \2.45-2.7 I (Ga) / (Ga) ~ ... --s ,. --" --- / . 0, craton ~ , .;.~'O \ .. & Saharan I '10.~~ . le "' , . ~~' 13,0 " ...... 1.0-1 .57 - \ 'i~ <:,' .... (~'O\:~~~ / 1.55-1.75 , Ji g, I A / . 19225 , c- Q) en Tafiat Formation u ·N Azarwas Formation AA6 0 Saghro Group ~ U--AA3 Q) Anti-Atlas Supergroup Imghi Formation --0 It.AA5 ~ Tittalt Formation a. 0 Q) z Bou Azzer and Iriri Groups: Ophiolites (Khazama and N'Kob ophiolites) and Iriri Migmatites Mimount Formation Taghdout Group Tirsal Formation AA1 Agouniy Formation Fig.4. Stratigraphic sketch column of the Sirwd Window showing the location of the samples of this study. size from fine rock fragments to coarse cobbles (up to 20cm). The most typical clasts are rounded quartzite pebbles, and less frequent are fragments of igneous and metamorphic rocks, with occasional angular faces. 126 concordant zircon analyses show essentially a sub-equal mixture of Paieoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic ages (Figs. 7, 8e, d ), and only two Archean grains. The only remark­ able difference with the previous sample (both from the Imghi Formation) is a significantly lower proportion of young zircons: 50-50% compared to 80-20% in the MS arkose. The probability plots of Fig. 7 show that that the Archean and Paleoproterorozoic zircon populations of this sample are similar to the Ml quartzite (and also similar to the other samples), except for the absence of Liberian (2.95-2.75 Ca) zircons. The distribution of Paleoprotero­ zoic zircons is 43% for the Eburnian interval (2.2-1.78 Ca) and 5% for the 2.75-2.25 Ca. The youngest Paleoproterozoic zircon has an age of 1789 ± 22 Ma (97% concordance) and the youngest popula­ tion age is 1798 Ma. The oldest zircon was dated at 2722 ± 14 (1 00% concordance). The Neoproterozoic JXJpulations have been represented in more detail in the concordia and probability plots of Fig. 8c, d. In the prob­ ability plots the 206/238 ratios have been used, because at this age range they are much more precise than the 207/206 ratios. The younger Neoproterozoic zircons show a marked peak at 610 Ma. The age of the youngest zircon is 591 ± 12 Ma (101 % concordance), and the oldest Neoproterozoic zircon was dated at 714±12Ma (101% concordance). The probability plot shows another minor peak at 635 Ma which extends until 644 Ma, and after that a sig­ nificantgap is observed between 644 and 714 Ma (one zircon) with only two ages at 661 and 662 ± 12 Ma. The age distribution is 50% of zircons of 0.55-0.65 Ga, and 2% of 0.66-0.77 Ga. 3.2.2. AzarwQS Formation (whitish arkosic sandstone: M6) This formation comprises three members, from bottom to top: Wissadene, Amajjar and Tougmast Members (Thomas et al., 2002). The Wissadene Member consists of sandstone, arkose and con­ glomerate. The Amajjar Member contains arkosic sandstone, shale and siltite. The Tougmast Member is the most extensive; the main body consists of arkosic greywacke, cross-bedded arkosic sand­ stone, whitish arkose and interbedded siltstone with subordinate shale and conglomerate and some basic and acid volcanic rocks. Sample M6 (30039134.0''N/7°22117.0"W): whitish arkosic sand­ stone collected west of Adrar Tougmast (Fig. 6a). The zircon age population in the collected sample is quite different with respect the other samples of the Saghro Croup (arkose MS and diamictite AA3), because is restricted to two age groups and the proportions of each group are very different. The presence of Ediacaran zir­ cons (0.65-0.55 Ca) is much lower, only seven grains from 107 (6.5%), with 206/238 ages of 600 ± 12 (two grains), 607 ± 11 and 621 ± 13 Ma (Fig. 8e, 0. The remaining 93% zircons are in the Eburnian-Birimian interval (2.2-1.78 Ca). 33. Bou Salda Group (M4: conglomerate) Although this formation is considered as a volcano-sedimentary sequence occupying a transitional stratigraphic JXJsition between the underlying Saghro Croup and the overlying Ouarzazate Croup, it presents some similarities with the Azarwas Formation. Their occurrence is limited to narrow fault-bounded troughs. It is consid­ ered by Thomas et al. (2002) as a syn-collisional molasse consisting of arc-derived volcano-clastic rocks deposited in a fore-arc basin. The Bou Salda Croup is mainly composed by two members which N A0 / A'-:7( K - /\ /\ A A A /\ i\ /\ r-:-:l Boutazarte Granite L........'J (Ammassine suite) oc--n Arg Gahhro ~ (Assarag suite) C Younger cover rocks k:::::;I Sandstones, Tuff ~ Conglomerates '" _ Dacites ~ ~ r=:=:J Andesites t:: ~ Rbyolite and trachytes " o t· 0·:1 Epiclastic rocks Saghro Group roo:o,,::'-01 Arkosic sandstone, lO.',:O.", sandstone, conglomerate ~ Thrust ___ Fault D Younger rocks h~\1 Ouarzazate group Taghdout, Bou Azzer, SF! Saghro and Bou Salda groups. Assarag suite • Paleoproterozoic basement o 25 km Fig. 6. (a) Geological map of southern part of the Sirwa inlier, modified from the 1 :50.000 geological map ofTaghdout sheet (Geological Survey of Morocco, 2000). (b) Geological sketch map of the Zenaga inlier. .c nI .c e Cl. Q) > :;::; nI Q) 0:: P PROTEROZOIC ARCHEAN A ~------,----------,--------------~----,---~ L. NEO- MESO- PALEO- NEO- MESO- 500 0% c:: ____ 9~ 30lo;'~----~ 00.55 - 0.65 . 1.78-2.2 00.65 - 0.55 00.77-0.66 . 2.2-1 .78 .2.75-2.25 00.65 - 0.55 .2.2-1.78 19% 1% !!!!!!.r.;;:-- 00.65 - 0.55 , 70% 00.77-0.66 2% 81% . 2.2-1 .78 .2.75-2.25 00.65 - 0.55 [;l 0.77-0.66 . 2.2-1.78 .2.75-2.25 17% 2% • 2.2-1 .78 (Eburnian-Birimian) • 2.75-2.25 (10) . 2.95-2 .75 (Liberian) 95-105% conc.J '" ::2: AA 7: Basal Conglomerate o co o N (Ouarzazate) N=67 Top AA4: Quartzitic cobble from conglomerate (Bou Salda) N=81 AA6: Arkosic sandstone (Fm. Azarwas) N=107 AA5: Arkose (Fm. Imghi) N=89 AA3: Diamictite (Fm. Imghi) N=126 AA1 : Taghdout quartzite, N=116 Bottom 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 207/206 U-Pb age (Ma) Fig. 7. Probability plots of detrital-zircon U-Pb age populations from the Neoproterozoic formations of the Anti-Atlas belt samples anaJyzed in this study. Plots are arranged with the oldest stratigraphic unit sampled at the bottom and the youngest unit at the top. 0.109 0.107 0.105 0.103 0.101 0.099 0.097 e l--------------:;,.-----, AA6: Arkosic sandstone (Fm. Azarwas) Neoproterozic zircons with less than 5% discordance 0.095 L----L_~_~~_~_~~_~ __ ___' 0.76 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.09 O.BO 0.84 O.BB AA5: Arkose (Fm.lmghi) ___ ·r L'U-X 0.92 0.96 Neoproterozic zircons with less than 5% discordance O . OB LO'-~-~-~-~-~-~-~--.J 0.6 0.1 0.115 0.7 O.B 1.0 1.2 1.4 AA3: Diamictite (Fm.lmghi) Neoproterozic zircons with less than 5% discordance O.B 0.9 1.0 1.1 3rIJr-----------------~ ~ E ::> z 2 500 550 600 \ 650 700 206/238 age (Ma) AA6 N=7 750 BOO 14 r@}f------------------~ ~ Q) .Q E ::> z 12 10 B 6 4 2 500 j 550 v I~ 600 650 700 206/238 age (Ma) AA5 N=71 750 BOO 1B ~f----------------------, 16 14 12 t 10 .c E B ::> Z 6 4 2 500 550 600 AA3 N=65 650 700 750 206/238 age (Ma) BOO Fig.8. U-Pb Concordia diagrams and detailed relative probability plots depicting the Neoproterozoic zircon populations forsampJes MS (a, b), AA3 (c, d) andAA6 (e, f). They are arranged from bottom to top according to their stratigraphic position. 10 0.102 9 AA7: Conglomerate AA7 AA7 (Ouarzazate) 8 N=66 ::c 0.098 (I) 7 iii - 0.094 6 <. (I) ~ " 206 Pb '" 5 .Q ~ E 0 '''u 0.090 4 er :::I '" z 3 2: 0.086 ~ 2 Neoproterozic zircons with less than 5% discordance 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 0.62 0.66 0.70 0.74 0.78 0.82 0.86 2061238 age (Ma) 207Pb(135U 0.116 a 3jili} AA4: Quartzitic cobble 0.112 (Bou Salda) A AA4 ::c N=6 (I) iii 2 f- -0.108 <. ~ (I) '" " .Q ~ E 0 0.104 :::I er '" Z 2: r- ::+ 0.100 I" '< 0.096 \) \ 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 0.092 2061238 age (Ma) 0.74 0.78 0.82 0.86 0.90 0.94 0.98 1.02 Fig. 9. U-Pb concordia diagrams and detailed relative probability plots depicting the Neoproterozoic zircon populations for samples M4 (a, b) and AA7 (c, d). They are arranged from bottom to top according to their stratigraphic position. suggests that it could be reworked sedimentary rocks from this Group. 3.4. Ouarzazate Group SampieAA7(30032IS0.S"Nj7°07117.4"W): epiciastic conglomer­ ate of the Ouarzazate Group just above the discordant contact with the materials of the Saghro Group (Fig. 6b). 97% of the zircon JXJpu­ lation is the 550-650 Ma interval, and the remaining 3% (two grains) have 207/206 ages around 21 00 Ma. The maximum of the young zir­ con population is 571 Ma which, given the volcaniclastic nature of the conglomerate, is probably very close to the deposition age. The youngest zircon found was dated at 537 ± 12 Ma (96% concordance) and the youngest population age is 557 Ma. The oldest zircon gave an age of 2121 ± 17 (101 % concordance). 4. Discussion 4.1. Pasive margin sequence The age of the platform margin sequence covering the Pale­ oproterozoic basement (Taghdout and Lkest Groups) is not well constrained. The dikes crosscutting the basal part of the series are dated by an old Rb-Se whole rock at 787 ± 1 0 Ma ((ahen et ai., 1984a,b). The other constrains are indirect: they are below the Bou Azzer ophiolitic complex with an obduction age of 660 Ma, and a minimum age of 788 ± 9 is indicated by a Rb-Sr age on clay fractions from Taghdout metasediments (Clauer, 1976). The new zircon data obtained in this study from the Taghdout quartzite (AA1) do not narrow very much the previous time constraints; the youngest zircon is 1809 Ma, thus not precluding the possibility that the sequence could be Paleoproterozoic. The quartzite only contains Archean and Paleoproterozoic zir­ cons, whose main characteristics are discussed below. The lack of zircons with more than 3.0 Ga (Leonian orogeny) indicate that the provenance area of the sediments was relatively far away of the principal potential source of Meso- and Paleoarchean zircons, located in the Man and Nigerian shields in the south part of the WAC (Fig. 2 ; Rocci et al., 1991; Kroner et al., 2001; Thh~blemont et al., 2004). The only known source of zircons of that age in the north­ ern part of the WAC is restricted to small parts of the Amsaga area in the Reguibat shield (Auvray et al., 1992; Potrel et al., 1996; Key et al., 2008 ). Therefore, the source area of the quartzites is inferred to be the proximal, authocthonous basement of the Anti-Atlas belt, N active arc '" U-~ 0.55 - 0.65 1.8-2.2 2.2-2.7 Ga? 1.8-2.2 S 2.2-2.7 ? 2.7-2.9 Ga ~':\j ~~-------------------~~~~ ~Bousalda [: :::::~.: ::J Saghro Group • Ophiolit ic complex (Bou Azzer) r-::::::l Pasive margin sequence ~ (Taghdout and Lkset Groups) ~ Peri-Gondwnan type basement? L....::::::J (previously detached from WAC?) r-+l West African ~ craton basement • Cale-alkaline magmas, HKCA granitoids • Oceanic crust WAC Ca. 610 Ma 0.6 Ga ~ Possible sources or zircons Fig. 10. Geological sketch section showing the possible source areas of the zircons for the main lithostratigraphic groups of the Anti-Atlas according to the data presented in this study. formed essentially by Paieoproterozoic components (Fig. 10). As a more general conclusion, an interesting feature of the zircon sig­ nature of sediments whose source area is the northern part of the WAC should be the absence of more than 3.0 Ga zircons. The old­ est groups of Archean zircons is very scarce and only have been found in the Taghdout quartzite (AA1), where they only represent 2% of the total zircon population. Their ages vary from 2936 to 2746 Ma, and can be ascribed to the Liberian orogeny. The follow­ ing younger group of zircons, between 2.75 and 2.25 Ga, represent a significant group with a proportion 17% (see circular diagrams in Fig. 7 ). It is the most intriguing population, because the Archean and Paleoproterozoic evolution of the WAC does not register any tectonothermal event in that range of ages (typical zircon age ranges of the WAC are shown in Fig. 1 ). The youngest granitoids related with the Neoarchean development of the Reguibat shield are 2726 ± 7 Ma (Potrel et ai., 1998; Key et ai., 2008 ), and the fol­ lowing registered events are the early Eburnian ca. 2250 Ma. Thus, a gap on zircon ages between ca. 2700 and 2050 Ma is assumed to be characteristic of rocks coming from the WAC (Nance et al., 200S ). The presence of these concordant zircon ages in the platform sequence located directly over the WAC suggest that some impor­ tant magmatic or orogenic event within this age interval should be registered in some part of the north WAC basement that have not been discovered yet. It is interesting to note that small JX)pulations of zircons between 2.75 and 2.25 Ga are present in the sediments of some peri-Gondwanan terranes of NW Iberia whose source area is assumed to be the WAC (e.g. Diez Fernandez et al., in press ). Within the zircons of this group, the main age peaks are located at 2450 and 2514Ma. One possible location for these basement rocks could be the Eglab Massif an the north of the Reguibat shield in Algeria, where some Sr and Nd model ages suggest the pres­ ence of rocks about 2.4-2.5 Ga (Peucat et al., 2005), although the ages have not been confirmed by U-Pb in zircon. The third group of zircons is the main population of zircons (S3%, Fig. 7) coming from the "old" basement (2.2-1.7S Ga). This group is related with the important Eburnian-Birimian tectono-magmatic activity reg­ istered elsewhere in the WAC, especially in the north part of the Reguibat shield and in the basement of the Anti-Atlas belt. 4.2. Saghro, Bou Salda and Ouarzazate Groups Neoarchean and Paleoproterozoic zircons. The first age group found is between 2.75 and 2.25 Ga. It is lacking in samples AA6 and AA7, represents a small proportion in samples AA3 and AA5 (1 % and 5%), and only reaches a significant proportion, 17% and 16%, in sam­ ples AAl and AA4 respectively (Fig. 7 ). A JX)ssible source area for these zircons could be the northern terrane that should have been accreted to the WAC margin immediately after the obduction of the ohiolites (Gasquet et al., 200S ; Fig. 10). This terrane would be fur­ ther to the north of the Saghro arc, and at present is hidden by the south Atlas major fault (Fig. 2), but it would presumably be equiv­ alent to the basement of the present peri-Gondwnanan Meseta terranes to the north of the Atlas chain (Ennih and Liegeois, 200S ). The last group corresponds to the Eburnian cycle (2.2-1.7S Ga), and their proportion with respect to the total population varies between 93% (sample AA6, sandstone from Azarwas Formation) and 3% in the younger sample (AA7, Ouarzazate Group conglomerate). Neoproterozoic zircons. The proportion of Neoprotero­ zoicjPaleoproterozoic zircons varies considerably from the bottom to the top of the sedimentary sequence, showing the fluctuations in the source area, depending on the nature of the exhumed rocks that were being uplifted and eroded: the cratonic basement or the rocks related with the Pan-African orogeny. The oldest passive margin Taghdout quartzite (AA1), located below the suture, does not have any Neoproterozoic zircons, and going to the top of the sequences above the suture, the proJX)rtion of Neoproterozoic zircons in each sample is SO% (AA5), 52% (AA3), 7% (AA6), 5% (AM) and 97% (AA7) (Figs. 4 and 7). The youngest zircon JX)pulation in Saghro and Bou Salda Groups is 610-620 Ma, whereas in the discordantly overlying Ouarzazate Group is 557 Ma. In the case of the zircons from the Imghi Formation (arkose AA5 and diamictite AA3), the differences in the zircon population could be related with a proximal supply of sediments for the arkose and a more distal source for the diamictite, due to longer transport in ice blocks favouring a higher proJX)rtion of zircons from the Eburnian basement. In tectono-stratigraphic reconstructions of the Anti-Atlas belt, the deformation affecting the Saghro Group was classically attributed to the Pan-African collision, and according to this view, the age of this group should be older than 660-700 Ma (Thomas et al., 2004 ). However, recent U-Pb zircon dating of the turbidites from the Saghro inlier place this group in the 630-610Ma age range (Gasquet et al., 200S ). Our new data presented here from the Sirwa inlier are in the same age range. Thus, one important conclusion of this study is the confirmation that the deposition of the Saghro Group actually post-dates the accretion of the ca. 750Ma ophiolites and arc derived terranes (Iriri arc) to the WAC margin, which probably occurred during the second phase of the Pan-African deformation (ca. 660Ma; 02 of O'Lemos et al., 2006). The deposition age younger than 610 Ma demands a reassessment of the origin and stratigraphic JX)sition of the Saghro Group. The deformation described on the sediments of the Saghro Group can no longer be related with the main phase of Pan-African deforma­ tion, instead it should be ascribed to a post-610Ma deformational event related with the late to post-collisional evolution. This defor­ mation may be at the origin of the exhumation of the Pan-African metamorphic section. Considering that the Saghro Group rest directly over the Anti­ Atlas suture, another interesting feature of the zircon spectra is the scarcity of 800-650 Ma zircons (at least from the Imghi Formation to the top of the sequence; Fig. 7), which implies that the source of the sediments was in some way isolated from the suture area. It is possible that a topographic barrier, e.g. accretionary prism, restricted sediment transport from the active orogen to the fore­ land basin (Fig. 10 ). The data presented in this study indicate that the source of the sediments was a terrane with north-WAC base­ ment and a younger component of620-s80 magmatic rocks, with a major peak around 610 Ma. On the other hand, the high-K cale­ alkaline granites intrusive in the Saghro Group range from 615 to 580 Ma (Ait Malek et ai., 1998; De Wall et ai., 2001; Levresse et ai., 2001; Thomas et al., 2002; Inglis et al., 2004 ), being indistinguish­ able from the age of sedimentation of the wall rocks, with a lower limit marked by the age of the discordant overlying sequence, the Ouarzazate Group, that show intrusive igneous rocks of ca. 580 Ma (Toufghrane Suite; Mifdal and Peucat, 1985; Thomas et al., 2002 ). Thus, the age of deposition and the intrusion of granitoids seems closer than the resolution limit of the radiometric dating, suggest­ ing a highly active geodynamic realm where magmatism, relief formation, erosion and sedimentation occurs at a high velocities. This apparent synchronicity of the sedimentation and their subse­ quent metamorphism and intrusion by plutonic bodies is a typical feature of magmatic arc settings (Abati et al., 2003 ), and therefore we proJXJse that the Saghro Group come from the erosion of a ter­ rane located further to the north of the Anti-Atlas suture, probably a magmatic arc built uJXJn WAC basement. The arc should have been incipiently detached from its margin, in a way that most of the detrital material came from the arc itself and their basement, and permitting only limited communication with the suture area (Fig. 10). This JXJssible arc activity of ca. 61 0 Ma could be correlated with the long-lived arc surrounding the northern Gondwana mar­ gin (Fig. 1 ), characterized by abundant cale-alkaline voleanic rocks and cogenetic plutons, sedimentation and deformation associated with the opening and closing of arc-related basins that gave rise to the peri-Gondwanan terranes and finally to the opening of the Rheic Ocean (e.g. Murphy and Nance, 1989; Keppie et al., 1996; Murphy et al., 2004; Nance et al., 2008 ). The different proJXJrtions of sediments coming from the arc with respect to the basement can be interpreted in terms of the birth, development and erosive dis­ mantling of the arc. The strong signal of ca. 650-550 Ma (50% of the zircons) appearing in sample AA3, reaching a maximum of 70% in sample AAs (Fig. 7 )would be related with the formation of the arc. The subsequent decreasing of this group of zircons going to higher stratigraphicallevels (7% and 4% in samples AA6 and AA4) would be associated with the progressive dismantling of the arc. According to the former interpretation of the age of the Saghro Group, the diamictite beds that appear in the Imghi Formation have been correlated with the Sturtianglacial period ca. 700 Ma (Thomas et al., 2002, 2004 ). However, the zircons from one sample of these diamictites (sample AA3) indicate that the correlation cannot be maintained longer, and instead they should be correlated with the Marinoanglacial period ca. 630-610 Ma (Kennedyet al., 1998 ), with a widespread distribution of glaciogenic deposits in West Africa (Deynoux et ai., 2006). 5. Conclusions 1. The lack of zircons older than 3.0 Ga indicates that the source of the Neoproterozoic sedimentary sequences of the Anti-Atlas belt was the northern part of the WAC autochthonous basement (Reguibat shield). 2. The group of Neoarchean-Paleoproteroic zircons (2.75-2.25) suggests the existence of a tectonothermal event(s) in the north­ ern part of the WAC with a peak at ca. 2.5-2.4 Ga, which have not been described yet. 3. The major zircon source of the sediments was the igneous and metamorphic Eburnian rocks located in the Reguibat shield (except for the Ouarzazate Group). 4. The depositional age of the Saghro Group is younger than 620-610Ma and hence the deformation that affects the sedi­ ments should be late- to post-collisional. S. The sedimentary sequences of the Saghro Group probably reflects the development and subsequent erosive dismantling of a magmatic arc located to the north of the Pan-African suture and built upon north WAC basement. 6. This arc can be correlated with the long-lived arc-system surrounding the northern Gondwana margin during the Neoproterozoic-Lower Cambrian. 7. The diamictite beds appearing in the Sagrho Group are related to the Marinoan glacial period. Acknowledgments We would like to express our thanks to Bob Thomas, an anonymous reviewer and the editor P. Cawood for helpful and con­ structive reviews. Field work was funded by project A-7287-06 from the Agencia Espafiola de Cooperacion Internacional (AECI), and analytical work was funded by project CM-UCM-910129 from the Comunidad de Madrid. Appendix A. Supplementary data Supplementary Frei and Gerdes, 2009; Gerdes and Zeh, 2009; Jackson et al., 2004; Janousek et al., 2006; data associated with this article can be found , in the online version, at doi:l 0.1 016/j .precamres.201 0.05.018 . References Abati, j., Arenas, R., Martfnez Catalan, j.R, Dfaz Garcia, F., 2003. Anticlockwise P-T path ofgranulites from the Monte Castelo Gabbro (Ordenes Complex, NW Spain). Journal of Petrology 44 (2), 305-327. Abouchami, W., Boher, M., Michard, A., Albarede, F., 1990. A major 2.1 Ga event of Mafic magmatism in West Africa: an early stage of crustal accretion. Journal of Geophysical Research 95, 17605-17629. Ait Malek, H, Gasquet, D., Bertrand,j.M., Leterrier,j., 1998. Eburnian and Panafrican granitoids from the Igherm, Kerdous and Bas-Draa Proterozoic inliers (west­ ern Anti-Atlas, Morocco): U-Pb geochronology on zircon. Comptes Rendus de I'Academie des Sciences Series llA Earth and Planetary Science 327, 819-826. Al Ansari, A., Sagon, j.P., 1997. Le gisement d'or de Tiouit Obel Saghro, Anti-Atlas, Maroc) Un systeme mesothermal polyphase a sulfures-or et hematite-or dans une granodiorite potassique d'age proterozolque superieur. Chronique de la Recherche Miniere 527, 3-25. Auvray, R, Peucat, j.-j., Potrel, A., Burg, j.-P., Caruba, C, Dars, R, Lo, K., 1992. Don­ nees geochronologiques nouvelles surl'Archeen de l'Amsaga (Dorsale Reguibat, Mauritanie). Comptes rendus de I'Academie des sciences 315 (1),63-70. Avigad, D., Kolodner, K., McWilliams, M., Persing, H, Weissbrod, T., 2003. Origin of northern Gondwana Cambrian sandstone revealed by detrital zircon SHRIMP dating. Geology 31 (3),227-230. Bassias, Y, Wallbrecher, E., Willgallis, A., 1988. Tectonothermal evolution of the late Panafrican Orogeny in the central Anti-Atlas (Southern Morocco). The Atlas System of Morocco, 43-60. Boher, M., Abouchami, W., Michard,A.,Albarede, F.,Arndt, N.T., 1992. Crustal growth in West Africa at 2.1 Ga. Journal of Geophysical Research 97, 345-369. Cahen, L, Snelling, N.j., Delhal, j., Vail, j.R., Bonhomme, M., Ledent, D., 1984a. The Geochronology and Evolution of Africa. Oxford University Press, 512 pp. Cahen, L, Snelling, N.j., Delhal, j., Vail, j.R, Bonhomme, M., Ledent, D., 1984b. The Beochronology and Evolution of Africa. Oxford University Press, 512 pp. Clauer, N., 1976. Geochimie isotopique du strontium des milieux sedimentaires. Application a la geochronologie de la couverture du craton ouest-africain. Sci­ ences Geologiques Memoires, Strasbourg 45, 256. De Kock, GS, De Beer, CH, Chevallier, LP., Gresse, P.G., Thomas, Rj., 2000. Memoire Explicative de la Carte Geologique duMarocau 1/50,000, feuilleTaghdout. Notes et Memoires Service Geologique du Maroc 396,142. De Wall, H., Kober, R, Greiling, RO., Errami, E., Ennih, N., Abstract 2001 Age and structural setting of the grantoid emplacement in the area of Imiter (Eastern Saghro).ln: 2nd Coli. 3M. Marrakech, p. 19. Deynoux, M., Affaton, P., Trompette, R, Villeneuve, M., 2006. Pan-African tectonic evolution and glacial events registered in Neoproterozoic to Cambrian cratonic and foreland basins of West Africa. Journal of African Earth Sciences 46 (5), 397-426. Dfez Fernandez, R, Martfnez Catalan,J.R., Gerdes, A., Abati, j., Arenas, R, Fernandez­ Suarez, j., in press. U-Pb ages of detrital zircons from the Basal allochthonous units of NW Iberia: provenance and paleoposition on the northern margin of Gondwana during the Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic. Gondwana Research. doi : 1 0.1 016/j .gr.2009.12.006. D'Lemos, RS., Inglis,j.D., Samson, S.D., 2006. A newly discovered orogenic event in Morocco: Neoproterozic ages for supposed Eburnean basement of the Bou Azzer inlier, Anti-Atlas Mountains. Precambrian Research 147 (1-2), 65-78. Ennih, N., Liegeois,j.-P., 2008. The boundaries of the West African Craton, with spe­ cial reference to the basement of the Moroccan metacratonic Anti-Atlas belt. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 297 (1), 1-17. Ennih, N., Liegeois,j.-P., 2001. The Moroccan Anti-Atlas: the West African Craton passive margin with limited Pan-African activity. Implications for the northern limit of the craton. Precambrian Research 112 (3-4), 289-302. Errami, E., 2001. Les granitoldes panafricains post-collisionnels du Saghro oriental (Anti-Atlas, Maroc). Etude petrologique et structurologique par I' Anisotropie de Susceptibilite Magnetique (ASM). Universite EIJadida, EIJadida, 265 pp. Fernandez-Suarez, j., Dfaz Garcia, F., Jeffries, I.E., Arenas, R, Abati, j., 2003. Con­ straints on the provenance of the uppermost allochthonous terrane of the NW Iberian Massif: inferences from detrital zircon U-Pb ages. Terra Nova 15 (3), 138-144. Fernandez-Suarez, j., Gutierrez Alonso, G., Jeffries, I.E., 2002. The importance of along-margin terrane transport in northern Gondwana: insights from detrital zircon parentage in Neoproterozoic rocks from Iberia and Brittany. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 204 (1-2), 75-88. Frei, D., Gerdes, A., 2009. Precise and accurate in situ U-Pb dating of zircon with high sample throughput by automated lA-SF-ICP-MS. Chemical Geology 261 (3-4), 261-270. Gasquet, D., Levresse, G., Cheilletz, A., Azizi-Samir, M.R., Mouttaqi, A., 2005. Con­ tribution to a geodynamic reconstruction of the Anti-Atlas (Morocco) during Pan-African times with the emphasis on inversion tectonics and metallogenic activity at the Precambrian-Cambrian transition. Precambrian Research 140 (3-4),157-182. Gasq uet, D., Ennih, N., Liegeois,J .P., Soulaimani, A., M ichard, A., 2008. The Pan-African belt continental evolution. The Geology of Morocco, 33-64. Geological Survey of Morocco (2000). Geological Map of Morocco 1/50,000; sheets no 394 (Tamallakout) and no 396 (Taghdout). Gerdes, A., Zeh, A., 2006. Combined U-Pb and Hf isotope lA-(MC-)ICP-MS analyses of detrital zircons: comparison with SHRIMP and new constraints for the prove­ nance and age of an Armorican metasediment in Central Germany. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 249 (1-2), 47-61. Gerdes, A., Zeh, A., 2009. Zircon formation versus zircon alteration - new insights from combined U-Pb and Lu-Hfin-situ lA-ICP-MS analyses, and consequences for the interpretation of Archean zircon from the Central Zone of the Limpopo Belt. Chemical Geology 261 (3-4),230-243. Gresse, P.G., de Beer, CH, Chevalier, LP., de Kock, GS, Thomas, Rj., 2000. Memoire explicatif de la carte geologique du Maroc au 1/50,000, feuille Tachoukacht. Notes et Memoires Service Geologique du Maroc, 393b. Hefferan, KP.,Admou, H, Karson,j.A., Saquaque,A., 2000. Anti-Atlas (Morocco) role in Neoproterozoic Western Gondwana reconstruction. Precambrian Research 103,89-96. Hirdes, W., Davis, D.W., Eisenlohr, RN., 1992. Reassessment ofProterozoicgranitoid ages in Ghana on the basis ofU/Pb zircon and monazite dating. Precambrian Research 56 (1-2), 89-96. Huch, KM., 1988. Die Panafrikanische Khzama-geosutur im zentralen Anti-Atlas, Marokko. Freie University, Berlin, 172 pp. Hurley, P.M., Leo, G.W., White, R.W., Fairbairn, H.W., 1971. Liberian age province (about 2700 m.y.) and adjacent provinces in Liberia and Sierra Leone. Geological Society of America Bulletin 82 (12), 3483-3490. Inglis,j.D., MacLean,j.S., Samson, S.D., D'Lemos, RS., Admou, H., Hefferan, K, 2004. A precise U-Pb zircon age for the Blelda granodiorite, Anti-Atlas, Morocco: implications for the timing of deformation and terrane assembly in the eastern Anti-Atlas. Journal of African Earth Sciences 39 (3-5),277-283. Jackson, S.E., Pearson, N.j., Griffin, W.L, Belousova, EA, 2004. The application oflaser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to in situ U-Pb zircon geochronology. Chemical Geology 211, 47-69. Janousek, V., Gerdes, A., Vrana, S., Finger, F., Erban, V., Friedl, G., Braithwaite, Cj.R, 2006. Low-pressure granulites of the Lisov Massif, Southern Bohemia: visean metamorphism oflate Devonian Plutonic Arc Rocks. Journal of Petrology 47 (4), 705-744. Kennedy, M.j., Runnegar, R, Prave, A.R, Hoffmann, K-H., Arthur, MA, 1998. Two or four Neoproterozoic glaciations? Geology 26 (12), 1059-1063. Keppie, j.D., Dostal, j., Murphy, j.R, Nance, RD., 1996. Terrane transfer between eastern Laurentia and western Gondwana in the early Paleozoic: constraints on global reconstructions. Geological Society of America, Special Papers 304, 369-380. Key, RM., Loughlin, S.C, Gillespie, M., Del Rio, M., Horstwood, M.SA, Crowley, Q.G., Darbyshire, D.P.F., Pitfield, P.E.j., Henney, P.j., 2008. Two Mesoarchaean terranes in the Reguibat shield of NW Mauritania. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 297 (1),33-52. Kroner, A., Ekwueme, RN., Pidgeon, RI., 2001. The oldest rocks in West Africa: SHRIMP zircon age for early archean migmatitic orthogneiss at Kaduna, North­ ern Nigeria. The Journal of Geology 109 (3), 399-406. Leblanc, M., Lancelot, j.R., 1980. Interpretation geodynamique du domaine pan­ africain (Precambrien terminal) de I'Anti-Atlas (Maroc) a partir de donnees geologiques et geochronologiques. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 17 (1), 142-155. Levresse, G., Azizi, MS, Cheilletz,A., Gasquet, D., Zyadi, R., Ennaciri, D., Archibald, D., Ouguir, H., Abstract 2001. Le gisement Ag-Hg d'lmiter (Anti-Atlas, Maroc): Nou­ velles donnees U-pb, 4oArp9Ar, *34S et microstructurales appuyant le moctele genetique hydrothermal-epithermal. In: 2nd Coil. 3M. Marrakech, p. 97. Liegeois,j.P., Claessens, W., Camara, D., Klerkx,j., 1991. Short-lived Eburnian orogeny in southern Mali. Geology, tectonics, U-Pb and Rb-Sr geochronology. Precam­ brian Research 50 (1-2), 111-136. Linnemann, u., McNaughton, N.]., Romer, RL, Gehmlich,M., Drost, K, Tonk,C,2004. West African provenance for Saxo-Thuringia (Bohemian Massif): Did Armorica ever leave pre-Pangean Gondwana? - U/Pb-SHRIMP zircon evidence and the Nd-isotopic record. International Journal of Earth Sciences 93 (5),683-705. Linnemann, u., Gerdes, A., Drost, K, Buschmann, R, 2007. The continuum between Cadomian orogenesis and opening of the RheicOcean: constraints from lA-ICP­ MS U-Pb ziecon dating and analysis of plate-tectonic setting (Saxo-Thuringian zone, northeastern Bohemian Massif, Germany). Geological Society of America, Special Papers 423, 61-96. Mifdal, A., Peucat,J.J., 1985. Datations U-Pb et Rb-Sr du volcanisme acide de l'Anti­ Atlas marocain et du sode sous-jacent dans la region de Ouarzazate. Apport au probleme de la limite Precambrien-Cambrien. Sciences Geologiques Bulletin, Strasbourg 38 (2), 185-200. Murphy,j.R, Nance, RD., 1989. Model for the evolution of the Avaloni an-Ca domi an belt Geology 17 (8), 735-738. Murphy,j.R, Pisarevsky, SA, Nance, RD., Keppie, j.D., 2004. Neoproterozoic-early Paleozoic evolution of peri-Gondwanan terranes: implications for Laurentia­ Gondwana connections. International Journal of Earth Sciences 93 (5), 659-682. Nance, RD., Murphy, j.R, Strachan, RA., Keppie, j.D., Gutierrez-Alonso, G., Fernandez-Suarez, j., Quesada, C, Linnemann, u., D'lemos, R, Pisarevsky, SA, 2008. Neoproterozoic-early Palaeozoic tectonostratigraphy and palaeogeogra­ phy of the peri-Gondwanan terranes: Amazonian v. West African connections. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 297 (1),345-383. Ouguir, H, Macaudiere, j., Dagallier, G., 1996. Le proterozolque superieur d'imiter, Saghro oriental, Maroc: un contexte geodynamique d'arriere-arc. Journal of African Earth Sciences 22 (2), 173-189. Peucat, j.-j., Capdevila, R, Drareni, A., Mahdjoub, Y, Kahoui, M., 2005. The Eglab massif in the West African Craton (Algeria), an original segment of the Eburnean orogenic belt: petrology, geochemistry and geochronology. Precam­ brian Research 136 (3-4), 309-352. Potrel, A., Peucat, j.J., Fanning, CM., Auvray, B., Burg, j.P., Caruba, C, 1996. 3.5 Ga old terranes in the West African Craton, Mauritania. Journal of the Geological Society 153 (4),507-510. Potrel, A., Peucat, J.J., Fanning, CM., 1998. Archean crustal evolution of the West African Craton: example of the Amsaga Area (Reguibat Rise). U-pb and Sm-Nd evidence for crustal grow th and recyding. Precambrian Research 90, 107-117. Rocci, G., Bronner, G., Deschamps, M. (Eds.), 1991 Crystalline basement of the West African Craton. The West African Orogens and Circum-Atlantic Correlatives, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 31-61 pp. Samson, S.D., D'Lemos, RS., Miller, RV., Hamilton, MA, 2005. Neoproterozoic palaeogeography of the Cadomia and Avalon terranes: constraints from detrital zircon U-Pb ages. Journal of the Geological Society 162 (1),65-71. Samson, S.D., Inglis,J.D., D'Lemos, RS.,Admou, H., Blichert-Toft,j., Hefferan, K, 2004. Geochronological, geochemical, and Nd-Hf isotopic constraints on the origin of Neoproterozoic plagiogranites in the Tasriwine ophiolite, Anti-Atlas orogen, Morocco. PrecambrianResearch 135 (1-2), 133-147. Saquaque,A., Admou, H., Karson,j., Hefferan, K, Reuber, I., 1989. Precambrian accre­ tionary tectonics in the BouAzzer -El Graara region, Anti-Atlas, Morocco. Geology 17 (12), 1107-1110. Saquaque, A., Benharref, M., Abia, H., Mrini, 2., Reuber, I., Karson,j., 1992. Evidence for a Panafrican volcanic arc and wrench fault tectonics in theJbel Saghro,Anti­ Atlas, Morocco. Geologische Rundschau 81 (1),1-13. Schofield, DJ., Horstwood, MSA., Pitfield, P.E.]., Crowley, Q.G., Wilkinson, A.F., Sidaty, HCO., 2006. Timing and kinematics ofEburnean tectonics in the central Reguibat Shield, Mauritania. Journal of the Geological Society 163 (3),549-560. Stacey,j.S., Kramers,j.D., 1975. Approximation of terrestrial lead isotope evolution by a two-stage model. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 26 (2), 207-221 Thieblemont, D., Goujou,j.C, Egal, E., Cocherie,A., Delor, C, Lafon,j.M., Fanning, CM., 2004. Archean evolution of the Leo Rise and its Eburnean reworking. Journal of African Earth Sciences 39 (3-5), 97-104. Thomas, Rj., Chevallier, LP., Gresse, P.G., Harmer, RE., Eglington, RM., Armstrong, RA., de Beer, CH, Martini, j.E.]., de Kock, GS, Macey, P.H., Ingram, BA, 2002. Precambrian evolution of the Sirwa Window, Anti-Atlas Orogen, Morocco. Pre­ cambrian Research 118 (1-2), 1-57. Thomas, R.]., Fekkak, A., Ennih, N., Errami, E., Loughlin, S.C, Gresse, P.G., Chevallier, LP., Liegeois, j.P., 2004. A new lithostratigraphic framework for the Anti-Atlas Orogen, Morocco. Journal of African Earth Sciences 39 (3-5),217-226. Walsh, G.]., Aleinikoff,j.N., Benziane, F., Yazidi, A., Armstrong, T.R, 2002. U-Pb zircon geochronology of the Paleoproterozoic Tagragra de Tata inlier and its Neopro­ terozoic cover, western Anti-Atlas, Morocco. Precambrian Research 117, 1-20. Nuevo-ABATI 1-s2.0-S0301926810001336-main_Página_01 Nuevo-ABATI 1-s2.0-S0301926810001336-main_Página_02 Nuevo-ABATI 1-s2.0-S0301926810001336-main_Página_03 Nuevo-ABATI 1-s2.0-S0301926810001336-main_Página_04 Nuevo-ABATI 1-s2.0-S0301926810001336-main_Página_05 Nuevo-ABATI 1-s2.0-S0301926810001336-main_Página_06 Nuevo-ABATI 1-s2.0-S0301926810001336-main_Página_07 Nuevo-ABATI 1-s2.0-S0301926810001336-main_Página_08 Nuevo-ABATI 1-s2.0-S0301926810001336-main_Página_09 Nuevo-ABATI 1-s2.0-S0301926810001336-main_Página_10 Nuevo-ABATI 1-s2.0-S0301926810001336-main_Página_11 Nuevo-ABATI 1-s2.0-S0301926810001336-main_Página_12 Nuevo-ABATI 1-s2.0-S0301926810001336-main_Página_13 Nuevo-ABATI 1-s2.0-S0301926810001336-main_Página_14