Vol.: (0123456789) 1 3 Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04672-w ORIGINAL RESEARCH Optimization of reagent consumption in TEMPO‑mediated oxidation of Eucalyptus cellulose to obtain cellulose nanofibers Hongyu Xu · Jose Luis Sanchez‑Salvador · Ana Balea · Angeles Blanco  · Carlos Negro Received: 2 February 2022 / Accepted: 24 May 2022 / Published online: 21 June 2022 © The Author(s) 2022 be reduced to 0.025 mmol TEMPO/g and 0.5 mmol NaBr/g to minimize costs while maintaining the high fibrillation degree of the CNFs. The kinetic of the reaction can be considered as zero-order with respect to NaClO, and as first order with respect to cellulose. As a result of this work, the catalyst doses are reduced up to 75% compared to the most widely used catalyst doses (0.1  mmol/g TEMPO and 1  mmol/g NaBr), obtaining highly fibrillated CNFs with a lower envi- ronmental impact. This reduction of catalyst doses will reduce the costs and facilitate the implementa- tion of CNF production at industrial scale. Abstract Eucalyptus cellulose is usually pre-treated by oxidation with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine- 1-oxyl (TEMPO), NaBr and NaClO at pH 10.5 and 25  °C before the mechanical process required to obtain cellulose nanofibers (CNFs). In this study, dif- ferent aspects to improve the effectiveness and sus- tainability of the TEMPO-mediated oxidation are ana- lyzed. The optimization was carried out at different reaction times by modifying both the concentration of the NaClO and the amount of the catalysts (TEMPO and NaBr). Results show that the carboxyl groups increased up to 1.1  mmol/g with 5  mmol NaClO/g after 50 min, and that the catalyst concentration can Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10570- 022- 04672-w. H. Xu · J. L. Sanchez-Salvador · A. Balea · A. Blanco (*) · C. Negro  Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials, Complutense University of Madrid, Avda. Complutense S/N, 28040 Madrid, Spain e-mail: ablanco@ucm.es http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6820-7698 http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s10570-022-04672-w&domain=pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04672-w https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04672-w 6612 Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol:. (1234567890) Graphical abstract this problem is to increase the knowledge of the pre- treatment stage to maximize its efficiency (Djafari Petroudy et al. 2021). To obtain high quality nanofibers, 2,2,6,6-tetra- methylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO)-mediated oxi- dation (TMO) is the most common pretreatment due to the high homogeneity and fibrillation of the obtained CNFs. The oxidation of cellulose cata- lyzed by TEMPO was first used by Isogai and Kato (1998), guided by the oxidation of other polysaccha- rides using NaBr as co-catalyst and NaClO as oxidant (Chang and Robyt 1996; De Nooy et  al. 1995). C6 hydroxyl groups of cellulose are oxidized first into aldehydes and then, to carboxyl groups using the sys- tem NaClO/TEMPO/NaBr (Saito and Isogai 2004). This reaction at pH ~ 10 produces the electrostatic repulsion between the oxidized C6 groups of cellu- lose and facilitates the separation of CNFs during the subsequent mechanical treatment (Isogai et al. 2018). Table  1 summarizes the different conditions used for TMO by different researchers. Isogai and Kato (1998) studied the effects of TEMPO and NaBr in TMO of rayon cellulose using 18–24, 0.04–0.26 and 1.2–9.4  mmol NaClO, mmol TEMPO and mmol NaBr per gram of cellulose, respectively. They moni- tored the oxidation time required until the pH was constant without adding NaOH. The optimal TMO conditions were selected as 18/0.13/5.0 (NaClO/ TEMPO/NaBr) to maintain the highest PD and the shortest oxidation time to minimize the cellulose degradation. However, these TMO conditions do not consider the final properties of CNFs, such as optical Keywords Cellulose nanofibers · TEMPO- mediated oxidation · Sustainability · Cost reduction · Nanocellulose · Reagent consumption Introduction Cellulose nanomaterials have grown substantially in the last decades due to their great potential as green materials for several applications (Liu et  al. 2021). Nanocellulose presents advantageous properties both in aerogel or hydrogel structure, such as sorption capacity, high mechanical strength, high surface area, functionalization possibility or light weight. Further- more, they are obtained from renewable raw materials (Blanco et al. 2018; Klemm et al. 2018). Cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) are generally pro- duced through mechanical processes to break the cellulose structure down to the micro and nanoscale. However, the high energy costs of these processes require the use of pretreatments, which can be chemi- cal, mechanical or enzymatic (Kargarzadeh et  al. 2018; Nechyporchuk et  al. 2016). The pretreatment selection together with the intensity of the mechani- cal process affect considerably the fibrillation effi- ciency, resulting in CNFs of different qualities, which will define their final use (Sanchez-Salvador et  al. 2020). Although there are several small commercial and pilot plants, the production of CNFs is still lim- ited, due to the high initial investment and the high production cost related to the defibrillation of the cel- lulosic materials. An important factor to overcome 6613Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol.: (0123456789) transmittance or anionic charge. Tahiri and Vignon (2000) wider these studies considering different types of cellulose and using a similar TEMPO dose (0.1 mmol/g), but lower amount of NaBr (3 mmol/g), with an oxidant dose of NaClO of 13.6 mmol/g. Later, Saito and Isogai (2004) studied the oxida- tion time of cotton using a low content of TMO cata- lysts (0.016 mmol TEMPO/g and 0.25 mmol NaBr/g) and around 5 mmol of NaClO/g cellulose, obtaining an important increase of the carboxyl content until 2 h of reaction and a quick variation of PD during the first 30 min of reaction. After the extended oxidation up to 2 h, carboxyl groups were further formed up to about 0.6  mmol/g, whereas the content of aldehyde groups was around 0.2 mmol/g. They also studied the crystallinity and the crystal size of the oxidized CNFs Table 1 Different reaction conditions used for TMO NaClO (mmol/g) TEMPO (mmol/g) NaBr (mmol/g) (NaClO/TEMPO/NaBr) References 24 0.04 5.0 18–24/0.04–0.26/1.2–9.3 Isogai and Kato (1998) 24 0.13 5.0 18 0.06 5.0 18 0.13 5.0 18 0.26 5.0 18 0.13 1.2 18 0.13 2.3 18 0.13 9.3 13.6 0.1 3.0 13.6/0.1/3.0 Tahiri and Vignon (2000) 0–9.7 0.016 0.25 0–9.7/0.016/0.24 Saito and Isogai (2004) 15 0.06 2.3 15/0.06–0.26/0.6–2.3 Sun et al. (2005) 15 0.16 2.3 15 0.26 2.3 15 0.16 0.6 15 0.16 1.2 15 0.16 3.5 5 0.1 1 5/0.1/1 Saito et al. (2007), Fukuzumi et al. (2010), Balea et al. 2017, Sanchez-Salvador et al. (2021) 6 0.002–0.01 6 2–8/0.002–0.01/1.2–6 (Mao et al. 2010) 6 0.01 1.2–6 2–8 0.01 6 10 0.1 1 10/0.1/1 Okita et al. (2010) 1 0.016 0.25 1/0.016/0.24 Dai et al. (2011) 1.3–10 0.1 1 1.3–10/0.1/1 Shinoda et al. (2012) 5 0.1 0–1 5/0.1/0–1 Inamochi et al. (2017) 2–15 0.1 1 2–15/0.1/1 Serra et al. (2017) 15 0.1 13 15/0.1/13 Tang et al. (2017) 1–16 0.1 2 1–16/0.1/2 Lin et al. (2018) 5 0.2 1 5/0.2/1 This study 5 0.1 1 5/0.1/1 5 0.05 1 5/0.05/1 5 0.1 0.5 5/0.1/0.5 5 0.05 0.5 5/0.05/0.5 5 0.025 0.5 5/0.025/0.5 5 0.05 0.25 5 /0.05/0.25 6614 Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol:. (1234567890) using different doses of NaClO, and observed that both parameters were nearly unchanged, indicating that the oxidation occurs in accessible or disordered regions of the cellulose. Since then, most researchers have used the TEMPO and NaBr doses proposed by Saito et  al. (2007) (0.1  mmol/g TEMPO, 1  mmol/g NaBr and 1% (w/w) cellulose pulp) while other parameters, such as NaClO dose and the pH of the reaction, have been widely studied for the oxidation of different raw materials (Balea et  al. 2017; Fukuzumi et  al. 2010; Inamochi et  al. 2017; Lin et  al. 2018; Okita et  al. 2010; Saito et al. 2007; Serra et al. 2017). Therefore, there is the need to delve into the study of the catalyst dose effect. Time oxidation during TMO has been also little studied. In general, the oxidation is left until a con- stant pH is obtained and all NaClO is consumed. Only Lin et  al. (2018) reported the optimal oxida- tion time of wood dissolving pulp (Pinus caribaea) at 6 h resulting in a higher amount of carboxyl content (0.7 mmol/g). They observed that an extension of the reaction time barely enhanced the amount of carboxyl groups. Myja et al. (2018) tried to better understand the TMO conditions on thermomechanical pulp by using 4-acetamido-TEMPO as catalyst. Besides, Sanchez-Salvador et al. (2021) has recently proposed to reduce the oxidation time of cotton and eucalyptus pulp, below 1 h, although all the NaClO available in the medium is not consumed, avoiding an excessive cellulose degradation and allowing the reuse of the reagents in successive TMO cycles. Crystallinity and morphology of the raw material also affect the effi- ciency of the TMO pretreatment as well as the final properties of CNFs (Sanchez-Salvador et  al. 2022; Sun et al. 2005; Tahiri and Vignon 2000). For exam- ple, cellulose fibers from eucalyptus pulp have more disordered regions than fibers from cotton, favoring the TMO reaction due to the higher availability of C6 hydroxyl groups. Thus, by using the same TMO con- ditions, the amount of carboxyl groups obtained using cotton are lower than with eucalyptus pulp (Sanchez- Salvador et  al. 2021). However, none of these stud- ies analyzed the variation of the TEMPO and NaBr doses. Only Inamochi et  al. (2017) combined NaBr co-catalyst with other salts as Na2SO4 to reduce the presence of brominated compounds, observing that a reduction of NaBr dose up to 0.2 mmol NaBr/g cel- lulose, produces a slightly decrease on the carboxyl content after a reaction time of 100  min. Neverthe- less, this study was focused on maintaining the prop- erties of the oxidized cellulose combining both NaBr and Na2SO4. Therefore, the aim of this study is to improve the TMO knowledge to develop a more efficient and sus- tainable process to obtain highly fibrillated CNFs. In other words, minimizing NaClO, NaBr and TEMPO doses, as well as the reaction time to achieve a higher cellulose recovery, the environmental impact and the process costs of TMO are reduced while the CNF properties are maintained. As the optimal TMO con- ditions are affected by the raw material, the Eucalyp- tus cellulose is selected in the present study since it is one of the most common raw materials to produce CNFs. In a first part, NaClO consumption has been evaluated with time for different NaClO doses. After selecting the NaClO dose, NaBr and TEMPO doses have been studied. On both cases, the evaluation of the TMO conditions (time, NaClO, NaOH consump- tion and cellulosic pulp yield), the oxidized cellulose (carboxyl and aldehyde groups) and the final proper- ties of CNFs (transmittance, cationic demand (CD) and PD) have been quantified. The hypothesis is that a better integrated knowledge on all these factors will allow us to reduce the chemical doses and the oxida- tion time and, therefore, to improve the viability of the process. In addition, a kinetic study of the TMO reaction has also been considered in the determina- tion of the optimal conditions, including the recovery of the pulp and the catalyst cost. Table 2 Chemical Composition of the Eucalyptus bleached kraft pulp Compound Percentage (w/w, %) Cellulose 74.5 ± 0.4 Hemicellulose 16.9 ± 0.2 Soluble lignin 5.7 ± 0.2 Klason lignin 1.3 ± 0.1 Extractives 1.2 ± 0.1 Ashes 0.4 ± 0.1 6615Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol.: (0123456789) Materials and methods Materials Eucalyptus globulus ECF bleached kraft pulp, kindly supplied by Torraspapel, S.A. (Zaragoza, Spain) was used as cellulose source. Table 2 shows the chemical composition of the pulp. TEMPO reagent was purchased from Sigma- Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and stored at 4 °C before used. NaBr and 10% (w/v) NaClO solution (previously titrated to determine the actual concentra- tion of NaClO) were purchased from Panreac Appli- Chem (Barcelona, Spain). Reagents used for monitor- ing the reaction and characterization of the products, NaOH, HCl, Na2S2O3, KI and bis(ethylenediamine) copper(II) hydroxide solution, were also supplied by Panreac AppliChem (Barcelona, Spain). 0.1% (w/w) Poly-L-Lysine solution was purchased from Electron Microscopy Sciences (Hatfield, PA, USA). TEMPO-mediated oxidation reaction To prepare a batch of oxidized cellulose with certain chemical reagent conditions, 30  g of dry cellulose pulp was soaked in water for at least 24 h. The sam- ples were disintegrated for 30,000 revolutions at 2% (w/w) consistency in a Messmer pulp disintegrator manufactured by Mavis Engineering Ltd. (London, UK) and then adjusted until a final concentration of 1% (w/w) with deionized water. Before adjusting the concentration at 1% (w/w), different doses of TEMPO (0.025–0.2 mmol/g pulp) and NaBr (0.25–1 mmol/g pulp) were stirrer until complete the dissolution. The reaction starts with the addition of NaClO (2.5–10  mmol/g pulp) into the 5-L agitated reactor, maintaining the temperature at 25 °C, using a cool- ing jacket, and also the agitation at 400 rpm. The pH was adjusted in the range 10–10.5 with 2 M HCl and maintained constant with the addition of 2 M NaOH when necessary. During the reaction, 250  mL of sample were extracted from the reactor at different times. The sam- ple was washed through filtration steps using 500 mL of deionized water.  The oxidized pulps obtained (OPs) at ~ 5% consistency were stored at 4 °C to be characterized and, finally, homogenized to produce the CNFs. The reaction was monitored by the NaClO content, using a redox titration multi-step method (Lewin and Avrahami 1955). Firstly, three reactions take place in which NaClO, HCl, KI in excess and starch are com- bined to form a starch-triiodide complex. Then, the complex is titrated by Na2S2O3 to form a colourless solution. For the determination of NaClO, 25 mL of sample from the reactor were added in an Erlenmeyer flask together with 15 mL of deionized water, 20 mL of 2 M HCl and 10% (w/w) KI solution. The mixture was titrated with 0.13  M Na2S2O3, adding 2  mL of 0.2 M starch solution, until the sample becomes trans- parent. The concentration of NaClO was determined by the following equations (Eqs. 1 and 2): where V Na 2 S 2 O 3 is the volume of Na2SO4 used for titration. Characterization of the initial and oxidized pulp The composition of the initial pulp (Table  2) was determined according to TAPPI T204 (TAPPI 2017) (extractives), TAPPI T211 (TAPPI 2016) (ashes) and NREL/TP-510-42618 (NREL 2012) (cellulose and hemicellulose) laboratory analytical procedures. Briefly, the procedure consists of determining the extractives by Soxhlet extraction using acetone as solvent; the ashes by calcination at 525 °C; and the acid-insoluble lignin (or Klason lignin) by the fol- lowing stages: (i) acid hydrolysis of 0.3 g of dry pulp with 3 mL of 72% (w/w) H2SO4 during 1 h at 30 °C; (ii) dilution with 84 g of distilled water to avoid phase separation between high and low concentration acid layers; (iii) autoclaving at 121 °C for 1 h; (iv) collect- ing the precipitates by filtration; and (v) drying and weighting the filtration cake. The percentage of solu- ble lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose were deter- mined by analyzing the filtrate. Soluble lignin was obtained from the absorbance of the filtrate at 240 nm measured with UV–Vis spectrophotometer. Cellulose and hemicellulose were determined by HPLC of the filtrate after neutralization with CaCO3 and microfil- tration through 0.2 µm filter. (1)mol Na 2 S 2 O 3 = 0.13M ⋅ V Na 2 S 2 O 3 (2)mol NaClO = mol Na 2 S 2 O 3 2 6616 Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol:. (1234567890) To determine the solid content of OPs, samples were dried at 65 °C in a laboratory stove until con- stant weight. The amount of salts from TMO required its quantification by incineration at 525 °C according to the ISO 1762 standard (ISO 2019). The ash con- tent of cellulose source was negligible under 0.2% of the dry pulp. Therefore, cellulose content of OPs was calculated subtracting the salt content from the solid content. Carboxyl groups were determined by conduc- tometric titration with 0.15  g of dry pulp. 5  mL of NaCl 0.01  M and deionized water were added to a total volume of 55–60  mL. Then, 0.1  M HCl were added to adjust the pH around 2.5–2.8 to proto- nate the carboxyl groups. NaOH 0.05  M was added in 0.2  mL increments and the conductimetry values were recorded. At the beginning, the conductivity decreases due to the formation of water molecules with de hydroxyl ions from the NaOH and the protons of the HCl. Then, the undissociated H+ are attacked by OH− when the strong acid is neutralized. Thus, the conductivity is maintained at this stage. After the weak acid is neutralized, NaOH is in excess and the conductivity increases. The carboxyl groups are determined by Eq. 3. where, Vi and Ve are the volume of NaOH in the initial and end points in which the conductivity is constant. Aldehyde groups were established by a Schiff base reaction using 0.05  g of dry pulp, hydroxy- lamine hydrochloride at 5 wt. % and pH 3.5. In this (3)carboxyl groups ( mmolCOOH g dry pulp ) = ( Ve(mL) − Vi(mL) ) ⋅ NaOH molarity(M) dry pulp(g) condition, the aldehyde groups were converted to oxi- mes and HCl. NaOH 0.1 M was added to control the pH at 3.5. The reaction was finished when the pH is maintained without adding more NaOH and the alde- hyde groups were determined in the same proportion than the NaOH consumed. Micrographs of the OPs were displayed with a Zeiss Axio Lab.A1 optical microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Göttingen, Germany). PD was calculated from the intrinsic viscosity of the OPs, determined following the ISO 5351 standard (ISO 2010) using bis(ethylenediamine)copper(II) hydrox- ide solution as a solvent, based on Mark-Houwink- Sakurada (MHS) equation (Henriksson et al. 2008). Cellulose nanofibrils production and characterization To produce CNFs, the OPs were homogenized using a high-pressure laboratory homogenizer PANDA PLUS 2000 (GEA Niro Soavy, Parma, Italy). First, consistency of OPs was adjusted to 1% (w/w) and then, samples were treated at 600 bar and 4 passes of homogenization. CNFs were stored at 4 °C until they were characterized. Characterization of CNFs is detailed below. Trans- mittance measurements were carried out at 600  nm using 0.1% (w/w) CNF suspensions and a Cary 50 Conc UV–visible spectrophotometer (Varian Aus- tralia PTI LTD, Victoria, Australia). CD was meas- ured by an inverse colloidal titration. An excess of Fig. 1 TEMPO-mediated oxidation parameters. a NaClO consumption and b Carboxyl groups (stars) and aldehyde groups (circles) 2.5 / 0.1 / 1 5 / 0.1 / 1 10 / 0.1 / 1 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 2 4 6 8 10 N aC lO c on su m pt io n (m m ol / g ce llu lo se ) Time (minutes) (a) (b) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 C ar bo xy l a nd A ld eh yd e G ro up s (m m ol / g ce llu lo se ) Time (minutes) 6617Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol.: (0123456789) 0.001  N polyDADMAC (30–40  mL) was added to 25 mL of a 0.1% (w/w) CNF suspension and stirred for 24  h. The unreacted polyDADMAC was titrated with 0.001  N PesNa using a Mütek PCD05 particle charge detector (BTG Instruments GmbH, Herrsch- ing, Germany). As in the oxidized pulp, PD was also measured in CNFs. Finally, Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) of CNFs was carried out with a JEM 1400 microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) in the National Centre of Electronic Microscopy (Madrid, Spain) according to Campano et al. (2020). Results and discussion Evaluation of NaClO dose with the oxidation time Figure  1a shows the consumption of NaClO during TMO reaction using 2.5, 5 and 10 mmol of NaClO/g of cellulose fixing the doses of TEMPO and NaBr at 0.1  mmol/g and 1  mmol/g, respectively (2.5/0.1/1, 5/0.1/1 and 10/0.1/1). In the three cases, the con- sumption rate of the oxidant is not affected by the NaClO concentration obtaining similar results until all NaClO is consumed in the reaction. Thus, the reaction rate can be considered as zero-order with respect to NaClO (Mao et al. 2010). During the first minutes of the reaction, the consumption rate is very high due to the availability of C6 hydroxyl groups in the accessible disordered regions of the raw material. Progressively, the reaction rate slows down due to the oxidation of superficial surface of the cellulose and to a limited access to deeper regions favours second- ary reactions producing chlorates and bromates (Saito et  al. 2010). Among these secondary reactions, the breakdown of the polymeric cellulose chains is one of them. The oxidant attacks the 1,4-β-glycosidic bond of the cellulose, producing amorphous small chains that can be easily dissolved in the reaction medium (Saito et al. 2005). The accessibility to C6 groups is observed in Fig. 1b, in which the number of carboxyl groups show a quick increase in the first part of the reaction, and, in a second phase they are almost stabilized, prior to the NaClO consumption, with a very slow rise until the oxidant depletion (Sanchez-Salvador et  al. 2021). Then, the oxidation of hydroxyl groups to carboxyl and aldehyde groups reaches faster the plateau than NaClO consumption, due to the accessible disordered regions are easily attacked in the first minutes of the reaction obtaining carboxyl groups. After that, NaClO is mainly consumed in secondary reactions and chain cleavage. Different NaClO doses for the same reaction time pro- duce a similar number of carboxyl groups if oxidant is available. Using 2.5/0.1/1, the slower part of the reac- tion does not occur because all the oxidant is consumed in the first part. When 5/0.1/1 and 10/0.1/1 are added to the pulp, the number of carboxyl groups increases (a) (b) (c) Fig. 2 a Cellulosic pulp yield during TEMPO-mediated oxidation (TMO) reaction, b cationic Demand (CD) of cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) and c transmittance at 600 nm of CNFs 6618 Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol:. (1234567890) quickly up to 1.5 mmol COOH/g, 30 min after the reac- tion starts. Then, there is a slow increase stage from 30 to 60  min until the carboxyl groups reach 1.7  mmol COOH/g. From this moment, the carboxyl groups are constant when 5/0.1/1 is used at initial oxidant dose. However, the addition of 10/0.1/1 produces a further slowly increase of the carboxyl groups from 1.7 mmol COOH/g to 2.0 mmol COOH/g after 300 min. There- fore, an oxidant dose higher than 5/0.1/1 would not be required when TMO reaction last less than 1 h because the increase of the carboxyl groups is slow and remains almost constant. On the other hand, 1.7 mmol COOH/g is enough for the mechanical treatment. The amount of aldehyde groups, generated in the intermediate reaction of the obtention of carboxyl groups, remains constant in the three cases with values around 0.3–0.4  mmol/g of cellulose. This is because aldehyde groups can form intra- and inter- molecular hemiacetals with hydroxyl groups of cel- lulose. These hemiacetals are recalcitrant to further attack by the TEMPO-mediated oxidation due to steric hindrance (Saito and Isogai 2006). Therefore, the rate of NaClO consumption was assumed similar in the three cases independent of the amount of NaClO. The higher rate, at first, is associated only with the higher availability of native cellulose and then, a progressive diminution of the reaction due to the oxidation, indicating a zero-order reaction rate in relation to NaClO (Mao et al. 2010). Therefore, NaClO does not interfere in the reaction rate and its presence is required at any concentration only during the time the cellulose is oxidized. Cellulose pulp yield after TMO reaction is shown in Fig.  2a. Whenever the oxidation time increase, there is a decrease in the pulp yield due to the dis- solution of a part of the cellulosic fraction. However, scarce differences are observed among the doses studied. Only in the first minutes of reaction using 2.5/0.1/1 could be observed a higher pulp yield due to a less intensive oxidation. Besides, the final prop- erties of CNFs homogenized at 4 passes and 600 bar were studied using the CD (Fig.  2b) and transmit- tance at 600 nm (Fig. 2c). CD increases with the oxi- dation time because the anionic surface charge of the fibers also increases at the same time as the carboxyl groups rise up. Once the carboxyl groups stabilize, the CD remains practically constant, only a slightly increase is observed due to an extended reaction time. The 5/0.1/1 and 10/0.1/1 series have a higher CD since a higher concentration of oxidant breaks to a greater extent the hydrogen bonds between the fibers, generating a higher repulsion between the nanofibers. In the same way as CD, transmittance values show the same trends due to is related with the propor- tion of nanofibrils in the sample. Using 5 or 10 mmol NaClO/g of pulp more than 85% of transmittance can been achieved after 40 min of reaction, whereas with a lower oxidant dose (2.5/0.1/1), 70% transmittance is not reached at any time. Table  3 shows a diameter analysis of the three NaClO doses at 10, 30, 50 and 120 min of oxidation. 2.5/0.1/1 at 120 min has not been analysed since all NaClO has been consumed before. D10, D50 and D95 indicate the percentile 10, 50 and 95 of CNF diameter distribution when the samples are classified from the shortest to the largest. In all cases, the range of CNF diameters is on the nanometric scale with slight differences. The longer the oxidation time and Table 3 Statistical parameters of diameter of CNFs obtained at different oxidation times and NaClO doses Time (min) D10 (nm) D50 (nm) D95 (nm) Geometric Average (nm) Standard deviation (nm) Number of Samples 2.5/0.1/1 10 19.8 23.9 31.7 24.1 4.5 561 30 20.4 23.2 27.3 23.2 2.6 431 50 19.5 22.7 27.9 22.8 2.9 445 5/0.1/1 10 19.3 23.6 30.8 23.6 3.9 511 30 19.4 23.1 29.5 23.1 3.6 488 50 16.6 20.6 28.6 20.7 4.0 556 120 17.3 20.6 27.3 20.8 3.6 455 10/0.1/1 10 18.4 23.6 34.7 23.7 5.3 488 30 17.7 21.1 26.7 21.2 3.2 485 50 17.0 20.8 26.9 21.0 4.2 523 120 15.5 20.1 26.9 20.0 4.1 512 6619Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol.: (0123456789) the higher the NaClO dose, the diameter of the CNFs is smaller. However, the maintaining of the carboxyl groups after 50 and 120  min of oxidation in both 5/0.1/1 and 10/0.1/1 series show no differences in the diameter range with an average of 20–21 nm. There- fore, it is not necessary to extend the TMO reaction more than 50 min, which also improves the cellulose pulp yield. On the other hand, Supplementary Infor- mation (Fig. S1) shows the diameter distribution of the CNFs at different times of oxidation. After 10 min of oxidation, the diameter distribution is similar in all cases. Higher oxidation times for 2.5/0.1/1 show higher diameter range compared to the other samples due to all NaClO has been consumed in the first min- utes. TMO reaction using 5/0.1/1 and 10/0.1/1 and at least 50  min presents similar distributions. Since Fig. 1a indicates that the TMO reaction with 5/0.1/1 lasts about 90 min until the depletion of all NaClO. Then, the dose of 5 mmol NaClO/g has been selected in the second part of the study to have enough oxi- dant reagent to study the reaction without wasting it. Finally, Fig. 3 shows TEM images of CNFs after homogenization of the oxidized pulp at 10 and 50 min of oxidation time with different doses of NaClO (2.5, 5 and 10 mmol NaClO/g). Study of TEMPO and NaBr doses with the oxidation time Figure 4 shows the NaClO consumption during TMO reaction using different TEMPO and NaBr doses. The TMO doses commonly used by Saito et al. (2007) are shown in blue colour (5/0.1/1). As expected, doubling the amount of TEMPO catalyst causes the increase of the NaClO consumption rate. Thus, the reagent is depleted after 60 min instead of 90 min with the tra- ditional conditions, so the oxidation of the fibers, but also the secondary reactions, will occur in a shorter time, making more difficult its decoupling. On the other hand, reducing the amount of catalyst produces the deacceleration of the oxidant consumption. This effect is more pronounced with the reduction of NaBr than of TEMPO. The fact that the consumption of NaClO is higher does not mean that the oxidation reaction is improved, as it can be consumed in the degradation Table 4 Statistical parameters of CNF diameter prepared from different catalyst doses and oxidation time Time (min) D10 (nm) D50 (nm) D95 (nm) Geometric Average (nm) Standard Deviation (nm) Number of Samples 5/0.2/1 10 16.1 20.2 27.3 20.2 4.3 464 30 17.4 20.9 26.1 20.8 3.0 548 50 16.4 20.3 26.1 20.3 3.4 432 5/0.1/1 10 19.3 23.6 30.8 23.6 3.9 511 30 19.4 23.1 29.5 23.1 3.6 488 50 16.6 20.6 28.6 20.7 4.0 556 120 17.3 20.6 27.3 20.8 3.6 455 5/0.05/1 10 20.3 26.4 40.7 27.0 7.6 508 30 20.2 25.2 32.4 25.1 4.5 526 50 17.6 21.9 29.4 22.1 4.0 504 5/0.1/0.5 10 20.7 26.4 37.4 26.7 6.4 469 30 20.5 25.0 32.9 25.1 4.7 425 50 17.7 21.5 27.5 21.5 3.4 440 5/0.05/0.5 10 22.2 27.6 39.7 28.0 7.2 432 30 20.9 25.4 32.7 25.4 4.5 459 50 17.8 22.3 30.3 22.3 4.3 442 5/0.025/0.5 10 23.1 27.4 43.0 28.3 6.6 313 30 20.1 24.7 34.0 24.9 4.9 510 50 18.6 23.1 30.3 23.1 4.5 485 5/0.05/0.25 10 22.3 27.9 40.3 28.2 6.0 443 30 20.9 25.7 34.3 26.0 4.7 393 50 18.9 23.1 30.7 23.2 4.6 583 6620 Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol:. (1234567890) of cellulose, hemicellulose or in the side reactions (Saito and Isogai 2004). This effect can be observed by studying the amount of carboxyl groups or the cel- lulosic pulp yield. Figure 5 shows the carboxyl group content of the pulp fibers after TMO pretreatment varying TEMPO and NaBr doses. As in Fig.  4, the traditional conditions are shown in blue, in which a stability zone begins to observe after 30 min of oxida- tion reaching around 1.7 mmol of carboxyl groups/g cellulose and, from this time, carboxyl groups do not increase. Pulp yield decreases more noticeably with prolonged oxidation time, as shown in Fig.  6. The amount of carboxyl groups could be improved up to 1.9 mmol COOH/g by using 5/0.2/1, at the expense of higher catalyst costs and lower recovery of oxidized cellulose. Table 5 Polymerization degree of the oxidized cellulose and CNFs Original Cellulose Oxidized Cellulose CNF (Results in number of monomers of anhydroglucose) 5 / 0.2 / 1 931±17 240±15 175±6 5 / 0.1 / 1 206±11 168±5 5 / 0.05 / 1 239±6 206±8 5 / 0.1 / 0.5 212±7 200±9 5 / 0.05 / 0.5 221±7 199±6 5 / 0.025 / 0.5 316±6 256±16 5 / 0.05 / 0.25 303±6 216±4 Fig. 3 TEM images of CNFs at different oxidation times and NaClO doses 2.5 / 0.1 / 1 5 / 0.1 / 1 10 / 0.1 / 1 10 m in ut es o xi da tio n 50 m in ut es o xi da tio n 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 0 1 2 3 4 5 N aC lO c on su m pt io n (m m ol / g ce llu lo se ) Time (minutes) NaClO/TEMPO/NaBr (mmol/g) 5 / 0.2 / 1 5 / 0.1 / 1 5 / 0.05 / 1 5 / 0.1 / 0.5 5 / 0.05 / 0.5 5 / 0.025 / 0.5 5 / 0.05 / 0.25 Fig. 4 NaClO consumption during TEMPO-mediated oxida- tion with 5 mmol NaClO/g pulp 6621Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol.: (0123456789) The reduction in the catalyst concentration is associated with the increase in the oxidation time. Nonetheless, setting an oxidation time in the range of 50 min and reducing the catalysts up to 5/0.025/0.5, the amount of carboxyl groups remains around 1.1 mmol COOH/g, while the cellulose recovery has increased slightly. However, the reduction of NaBr up to 0.25  mmol/g does not allow obtaining higher carboxyl groups even using 0.05  mmol TEMPO/g. By varying the amount of NaBr while the TEMPO dose is maintained, such as in the case of 5/0.1/0.5 and 5/0.1/1, or even 5/0.5/1 and 5/0.5/0.5, the same carboxyl groups are reached but at different reaction times. The content of aldehyde groups of each experi- ment, as explained above, remains constant due to the formation of hemiacetals with hydroxyl groups of cel- lulose. Therefore, some aldehyde groups are not con- verted to carboxyl groups in TMO (Saito and Isogai 2006). As for the properties of the final CNFs, CD and transmittance were studied as shown in Fig.  7. The CD and transmittance follow the same trend, increas- ing with catalyst concentration. The variation of TEMPO dose affects less on the properties of the CNFs, whereas, the NaBr dose pro- duce higher variations, decreasing both CD and trans- mittance in a higher extent. The three oxidation exper- iments with 1 mmol/g of NaBr (5/0.2/1, 5/0.1/1 and 5/0.05/1) show higher CD and also transmittance, fol- lowed by the ones with 0.5 mmol NaBr/g (5/0.1/0.5, 5/0.05/0.5 and 5/0.05/0.5) and finally the oxidation reaction with 0.25 mmol NaBr/g (5/0.05/0.25). With 1  mmol/g of NaBr, the CD can be reached up to 1600–2100 µeq/g and the transmittance, to 80–95% after 50 min of oxidation. Whereas, using 0.5 mmol/g of NaBr, the CD is reduced to 1250–1600 µeq/g and Fig. 5 Carboxyl and aldehyde groups evolution during TEMPO-mediated oxidation 0 50 100 150 200 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 spuor G edyhedl A dnalyxobra C (m m ol / g ce llu lo se ) Time (minutes) NaClO/TEMPO/NaBr (mmol/g) 5 / 0.2 / 1 5 / 0.1 / 1 5 / 0.05 / 1 5 / 0.1 / 0.5 5 / 0.05 / 0.5 5 / 0.025 / 0.5 5/ 0.05 / 0.25 Carboxyl Groups Aldehyde Groups 0 40 80 120 160 200 0 20 40 60 80 100 C el lu lo si c pu lp y ie ld (% ) Time (minutes) NaClO/TEMPO/NaBr (mmol/g) 5 / 0.2 / 1 5 / 0.1 / 1 5 / 0.05 / 1 5 / 0.1 / 0.5 5 / 0.05 / 0.5 5 / 0.025 / 0.5 5 / 0.05 / 0.25 Fig. 6 Cellulosic pulp yield during TEMPO-mediated oxida- tion 6622 Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol:. (1234567890) the transmittance also is reduced to 60–70% at the same reaction time. Finally, with 0.25  mmol/g of NaBr, the CD can only achieve 1000 μeq/g and 30% of transmittance after 50 min of reaction. Table 4 shows the statistical parameters of CNF diameters obtained with different catalyst doses and oxidation time. It is observed that the most part of the fibers in all samples are on the nanometric scale even with an oxidation of only 10 min as D95 shows Fig. 7 a Cationic Demand (CD) of cellulose nanofib- ers (CNFs) after TMO and homogenization and b transmittance at 600 nm of CNFs 0 50 100 150 200 0 500 1000 1500 2000 C at io ni c D em an d ( eq /g ) Time (minutes) 0 50 100 150 200 0 20 40 60 80 100 Tr an sm itt an ce (% ) Time (minutes) (a) (b) NaClO/TEMPO/NaBr (mmol/g) 5 / 0.2 / 1 5 / 0.1 / 0.5 5 / 0.1 / 1 5 / 0.05 / 0.5 5 / 0.05 / 1 5 / 0.025 / 0.5 5 / 0.05 / 0.25 Fig. 8 TEM images of cel- lulose nanofibers (CNFs) at different TEMPO and NaBr doses 6623Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol.: (0123456789) with values under 43 nm. The shorter the oxidation time and the lower the catalyst dose, the CNFs are slightly wider. The two experiments with the higher amount of TEMPO (5/0.2/1 and 5/0.1/1) have a standard deviation around 4 for all oxidation times. In other words, the CNF diameter is relatively more homogeneous and slightly smaller than in the rest of cases, as shown in the distribution of diameter of the Supplementary Information (Fig. S2), in which the standard deviation was around 6–8 after 10 min of oxidation. For these last samples, as the oxidation time increased, the standard deviation resembled that of the samples with a higher amount of TEMPO, since they were more homogeneous. After 50 min of oxidation, the samples with lower doses of catalysts (5/0.025/0.5 and 5/0.05/0.25) had a geometric average of 23.1 and 23.2  nm, respec- tively, less than 3 nm above the average of the CNFs prepared with Isogai and co-workers conditions. In addition, the homogeneity of the CNFs is similar to the samples with higher catalyst doses as standard deviations indicate. Although the statistical param- eters of 5/0.05/0.25 are similar to 5/0.025/0.5, the cost of catalysts in this last case is lower due less TEMPO dose is used. So, it is possible to reduce the 75% and 50% the doses of TEMPO and NaBr, respectively maintaining a high fibrillation of CNFs after 50 min of oxidation. Finally, Fig. 8 shows TEM images of CNFs after homogenization, using 50 min of oxidation time with 5  mmol NaClO and different doses of TEMPO and NaBr. Previously, in Fig.  3 a micrograph using the same amount of oxidant agent and the traditional con- ditions of Saito and Isogai (2004) in terms of TEMPO and NaBr doses (5/0.1/1) has been plotted. Another property that has been analyzed for both oxidized cellulose and CNFs is the PD. Table  5 shows that the PD decreases from 931 ± 17 which is the value for the original wood pulp to 206–316 for OPs and 168–256 for the CNFs around 50  min of oxidation. The production of the hydroxyl radicals in the combination of TEMPO, NaBr and NaClO at basic pH brings a significant depolymerization of cellulose leading to a remarkable decrease in pulp viscosity (Shibata and Isogai 2003). The experi- ments performed with the lowest amount of catalysts (5/0.025/0.5 and 5/0.5/0.25) have the highest PD, around 320 for OPs and 220 – 260 for the CNFs, due to the catalyst doses. It is observed that the lower the amount of the catalyst, the lower the consumption rate of the NaClO, thus, the degradation of the poly- mer chains is decreased. On the other hand, PD of CNFs does not show a remarkable difference due to subsequent mechanical treatment using high pressure homogenizer, it also causes some depolymerization of wood cellulose (Funahashi et al. 2018). Study of reaction rate coefficient as a function of catalyst doses The chemical reactions that take place in TMO are divided into three main steps. First, the formation of HOBr from NaClO, then the formation of the ion TEMPO + and finally the oxidation of the pri- mary hydroxyl to aldehyde groups and then to car- boxyl group (Sun et  al. 2005). Some simplifications Fig. 9 Carboxyl groups versus a cationic demand and b trans- mittance at 600 nm 6624 Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol:. (1234567890) have been considered according to previous studies reported by Sun et  al. (2005) and Dai et  al. (2011), describing a pseudo first-order reaction system as Supplementary Information shows. In the first part of this study, the rate constant k1 for 2.5, 5 and 10 mmol of NaClO/g of pulp is around 4.5 × 10–3  min−1 with an error deviation of 3%. Simi- lar observations were found by Mao et al. (2010) who reported that the constant rate does not vary with the concentration of NaClO keeping constant the doses of NaBr and TEMPO at 6 and 0.01 mmol/g of pulp, respectively. However, they obtained a higher rate constant around 8.7 × 10–3  min−1 because the dose of NaBr was six times higher. Therefore, the constant value in the reaction rate implies a zero-order kinetic with respect to NaClO as Eq. S3 indicates. On the other hand, k1 values have been determined at different catalyst doses, maintaining the amount of oxidant at 5  mmol NaClO/g, as Supplementary Information shows. When the amount of TEMPO has been set to 0.05 mmol/g (Fig. S3a), there is a linear relationship between the rate constant with respect to NaBr dose. Moreover, the rate constants obtained with different amount of TEMPO (Fig. S3b), it seems to also have a linear trend. This observation is con- sistent and in the same magnitude order than the results reported by Mao et  al. (2010) as they found a linear relationship between k1 and the concentra- tion of NaBr and TEMPO. However, they used higher concentrations of NaBr (until 6 mmol/g of pulp) and a lower amount of TEMPO than the current study. Nevertheless, a higher reaction rate with higher doses of catalysts does not imply an improvement in the TMO process due to the losses of cellulose are higher in the samples which show a higher reaction rate at the same time the catalysts are more expensive. Study of catalyst costs and selection of the optimal doses One of the main parameters for the selection of the optimal TEMPO and NaBr catalyst doses is the cost. However, it is not the only one, but also the reac- tion time and the properties of the CNFs and the Fig. 10 Evaluation of cata- lyst cost of the TEMPO- mediated oxidation 6625Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol.: (0123456789) oxidized pulp to prepare the previous ones. Firstly, a study, which relates the different characterization parameters of the OPs and the CNFs, is carried out in order to reduce the number of variables involved in the study. Figure  9 shows that CD, transmittance and carboxyl groups obtained per gram of oxidized pulp are linearly dependent on each other, as long as they have the same subsequent homogenization. Therefore, it is possible to combine three different measurements, carried out using different methods, in one single parameter, thereby reducing the likelihood failure obtained through the variables independently. In other occasions, this fact could reduce the num- ber of variables analyzed decreasing the labor time. The evaluation of these three variables allows us to use the parameter "Estimated carboxyl groups" as an average of the three variables. In other words, the "Estimated carboxyl groups" can be calculated using the equations in the plot with CD and transmittance obtained experimentally. Comparing the "Estimated carboxyl groups" calculated by the linear fits respect to the experimental carboxyl groups, the difference between them is below than 5%. Thus, a 3D diagram to select the optimal condi- tions in TMO has been plotted in Fig.  10 using as variables the estimated carboxyl groups, the time of reaction and the catalyst costs, setting as reference the traditional conditions of Isogai, 5/0.1/1 at 120  min of oxidation (grey planes). Therefore, with these three variables plotted it is possible to join up seven parameters: carboxyl groups, transmittance, cationic demand, cellulosic pulp yield, reaction time and price and dose of both catalysts in relation to the tradi- tional conditions. The cost of the catalysts has been obtained through the average of different companies on an industrial scale with estimated average prices of 180 $/kg and 5000 $/t for TEMPO and NaBr, respec- tively. However, these are indicative prices, since they depend on each country, quantity, and the specific market situation. The use of high catalyst doses increases the car- boxyl groups but at the same time, the pulp yield decreases, and the cost is higher. Thus, it is neces- sary to find a compromise solution which satisfies the properties of CNFs without wasting unnecessary amount of catalysts. It is seen that each experiment reaches a maximum point of estimated carboxyl groups and then almost stabilizes. From this point, larger oxidation times are negative due to a higher degradation of the cellulose which reduce its recovery yield. In all cases, this time is much less than tradi- tional conditions (approx. 120 min), which indicates a high margin for TMO improvement. In addition, the CNF diameter analysis of Table  4 shows that in all samples the CNF size is enough to obtain highly fibrillated materials similar to the traditional TMO conditions. Thus, the use of 5/0.025/0.5 after 50 min of oxidation reduce in an 80% the catalyst cost per kg of recovery cellulose, making TMO process more economically viable in the industrial sector. Conclusions After studying the monitorization of the TEMPO- mediated oxidation reaction, the characterization of oxidized cellulose and homogenized CNFs is possible to conclude that the cellulose oxidation is performed at the same reaction rate, regardless the NaClO con- centration, if there is oxidant available in the reac- tion medium. Moreover, reaction time above 1 h and excess addition of NaClO to the system are unnec- essary due to cellulose losses and because carboxyl groups stabilise between 30 and 50 min, being these reaction times enough to obtain highly fibrillated CNFs. On the other hand, increasing the NaClO doses during the TEMPO reaction favours the degree of fibrillation in the samples, so the higher is the NaClO doses, the higher is the transmittance reaching up to 85%. As for the CD, the anions present in the CNFs are higher at 5/0.1/1 and 10/0.1/1 due to the higher specific surface area of the nanocellulose because of the increase in carboxyl groups. Therefore, it is con- cluded that the use of 5 mmol NaClO/g is enough to carry out TMO reaction up to 90  min of oxidation. Beyond this time, the CNF fibrillation do not improve and the cellulose pulp yield decrease. Catalyst doses play an important role in the oxi- dation. They affect the rate of oxidant consumption as well as the oxidation time. However, an excess concentration of TEMPO and NaBr leads to an unnecessary over cost of catalyst to obtain a similar nanofibrillation degree of CNFs. It is concluded that the amount of catalysts could be reduced up to 75% (TEMPO) and 50% (NaBr), which means a signifi- cant cost reduction in comparison with the traditional conditions. Therefore, the chemical reagent costs and the oxidation time have been improved while the 6626 Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol:. (1234567890) CNF fibrillation is maintained which will facilitate the sustainability of the process and its implementa- tion at industrial scale. Acknowledgments The authors are grateful for the finan- cial support by the Economy and Competitiveness Ministry of Spain (project PID2020-113850RB-C21 “CON-FUTURO- ES”), the Community of Madrid (project S2018/EMT-4459 “RETOPROSOST2-CM”). As well as the support of Univer- sidad Complutense de Madrid and Banco de Santander for the grant of J.L. Sanchez-Salvador (CT17/17). Also, authors would like to thank to the Spanish National Centre of Electronic Microscopy for the support during TEM images acquisition. Funding Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. Declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Com- mons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Crea- tive Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. References Balea A, Merayo N, De La Fuente E, Negro C, Blanco A (2017) Assessing the influence of refining, bleaching and TEMPO-mediated oxidation on the production of more sustainable cellulose nanofibers and their application as paper additives. Ind Crop Prod 97:374–387. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. indcr op. 2016. 12. 050 Blanco A, Monte MC, Campano C, Balea A, Merayo N, Negro C (2018) Nanocellulose for industrial use: cel- lulose nanofibers (CNF), cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), and bacterial cellulose (BC). In: Handbook of nanoma- terials for industrial applications. pp 74–126, Elsevier. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ B978-0- 12- 813351- 4. 00005-5. Campano C, Balea A, Blanco A, Negro C (2020) A repro- ducible method to characterize the bulk morphology of cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibers by transmission electron microscopy. Cellulose 27:4871–1887. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10570- 020- 03138-1 Chang PS, Robyt JF (1996) Oxidation of primary alcohol groups of naturally occurring polysaccharides with 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidine oxoammonium ion. J Carbohyd Chem 15(7):819–830. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 07328 30960 80056 94 Dai L, Dai HQ, Yuan YC, Sun X, Zhu ZJ (2011) Effect of Tempo oxidation system on kinetic constants of cotton fibers. BioResources 6(3):2619–2631 De Nooy AE, Besemer AC, van Bekkum H (1995) Highly selective nitroxyl radical-mediated oxidation of primary alcohol groups in water-soluble glucans. Carbohyd Res 269(1):89–98. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0008- 6215(94) 00343-E Djafari Petroudy SR, Chabot B, Loranger E, Naebe M, Sho- jaeiarani J, Gharehkhani S (2021) Recent advances in cellulose nanofibers preparation through energy-efficient approaches: a review. Energies 14(20):6792. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ en142 06792 Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Okita Y, Isogai A (2010) Thermal sta- bilization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose. Polym Degrad Stabil 95(9):1502–1508. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. polym degra dstab. 2010. 06. 015 Funahashi R, Ono Y, Tanaka R, Yokoi M, Daido K, Inamo- chi T (2018) Changes in the degree of polymerization of wood celluloses during dilute acid hydrolysis and TEMPO-mediated oxidation: Formation mechanism of disordered regions along each cellulose microfibril. Int J Biol Macromol 109:914–920. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ijbio mac. 2017. 11. 078 Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, Lindström T, Nishino T (2008) Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromol 9(6):1579–1585. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ bm800 038n Inamochi T, Funahashi R, Nakamura Y, Saito T, Isogai A (2017) Effect of coexisting salt on TEMPO-mediated oxidation of wood cellulose for preparation of nanocel- lulose. Cellulose 24(9):4097–4101. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10570- 017- 1402-y ISO (2010) ISO 5351:2010 Pulps — Determination of lim- iting viscosity number in cupri-ethylenediamine (CED) solution. Switherland, Geneva ISO (2019) ISO 1762:2019 Paper, board, pulps and cellulose nanomaterials — Determination of residue (ash content) on ignition at 525 °C. Switherland, Geneva Isogai A, Kato Y (1998) Preparation of polyuronic acid from cellulose by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Cellulose 5(3):153–164. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1023/A: 10092 08603 673 Isogai A, Hänninen T, Fujisawa S, Saito T (2018) Catalytic oxidation of cellulose with nitroxyl radicals under aque- ous conditions. Prog Polym Sci 86:122–148. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. progp olyms ci. 2018. 07. 007 Kargarzadeh H, Mariano M, Gopakumar D, Ahmad I, Thomas S, Dufresne A (2018) Advances in cellulose nanomateri- als. Cellulose 25(4):2151–2189. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10570- 018- 1723-5 Klemm D, Cranston ED, Fischer D, Gama M, Kedzior SA, Kralisch D (2018) Nanocellulose as a natural source for groundbreaking applications in materials science: today’s state. Mater Today 21(7):720–748. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. mattod. 2018. 02. 001 Lewin M, Avrahami M (1955) The decomposition of hypochlo- rite-hypobromite mixtures in the pH Range 7 10. J Am http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.12.050 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.12.050 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813351-4.00005-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03138-1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03138-1 https://doi.org/10.1080/07328309608005694 https://doi.org/10.1080/07328309608005694 https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(94)00343-E https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(94)00343-E https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206792 https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206792 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.078 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.078 https://doi.org/10.1021/bm800038n https://doi.org/10.1021/bm800038n https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1402-y https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1402-y https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009208603673 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009208603673 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.07.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.07.007 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1723-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1723-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.001 6627Cellulose (2022) 29:6611–6627 1 3 Vol.: (0123456789) Chem Soc 77(17):4491–4498. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ ja016 22a014 Lin C, Zeng T, Wang Q, Huang L, Ni Y, Huang F (2018) Effects of the conditions of the TEMPO/NaBr/NaClO system on carboxyl groups, degree of polymeriza- tion, and yield of the oxidized cellulose. BioResources 13(3):5965–5975 Liu S, Low ZX, Xie Z, Wang H (2021) TEMPO-Oxidized cel- lulose nanofibers: a renewable nanomaterial for environ- mental and energy applications. Int J Adv Meter Technol. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ admt. 20200 1180 Mao LS, Ma P, Law K, Daneault C, Brouillette F (2010) Stud- ies on kinetics and reuse of spent liquor in the TEMPO- Mediated selective oxidation of mechanical pulp. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(1):113–116. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ ie901 039r Myja D, Loranger É, Lanouette R (2018) TEMPO mediated oxidation optimization on thermomechanical pulp for paper reinforcement and nanomaterial film production. BioResources 13(2):4075–4092. https:// doi. org/ 10. 15376/ biores. 13.2. 4075- 4092 Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2016) Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crop Prod 93:2–25. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. indcr op. 2016. 02. 016 NREL (2012). NREL/TP-510–42618 Determination of Struc- tural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. Okita Y, Saito T, Isogai A (2010) Entire surface oxidation of various cellulose microfibrils by TEMPO-mediated oxida- tion. Biomacromol 11(6):1696–1700. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ bm100 214b Saito T, Isogai A (2004) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. The effect of oxidation conditions on chemi- cal and crystal structures of the water-insoluble frac- tions. Biomacromol 5(5):1983–9. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ bm049 7769 Saito T, Yanagisawa M, Isogai A (2005) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose: SEC–MALLS analysis of water-soluble and-insoluble fractions in the oxidized prod- ucts. Cellulose 12(3):305–315. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10570- 004- 5835-8 Saito T, Isogai A (2006) Introduction of aldehyde groups on surfaces of native cellulose fibers by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Colloids Surf A-Physicochem Eng Asp 289(1– 3):219–225. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. colsu rfa. 2006. 04. 038 Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromol 8(8):2485–2491. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ bm070 3970 Saito T, Hirota M, Tamura N, Isogai A (2010) Oxidation of bleached wood pulp by TEMPO/NaClO/NaClO 2 system: effect of the oxidation conditions on carboxylate content and degree of polymerization. J Wood Sci 56(3):227–232. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10086- 009- 1092-7 Sanchez-Salvador JL, Balea A, Monte MC, Negro C, Miller M, Olson J (2020) Comparison of mechanical and chemi- cal nanocellulose as additives to reinforce recycled card- board. Sci Rep 10(1):3778. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 020- 60507-3 Sanchez-Salvador JL, Campano C, Negro C, Monte MC, Blanco A (2021) Increasing the possibilities of TEMPO- mediated oxidation in the production of cellulose nanofib- ers by reducing the reaction time and reusing the reaction medium. Adv Sustain Syst 5(4):2000277. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ adsu. 20200 0277 Sanchez-Salvador JL, Campano C, Balea A, Tarrés Q, Del- gado-Aguilar M, Mutjé P, Blanco A, Negro C (2022) Critical comparison of the properties of cellulose nanofib- ers produced from softwood and hardwood through enzy- matic, chemical and mechanical processes. Int J Biol Mac- romol 205:220–230 Serra A, González I, Oliver-Ortega H, Tarrès Q, Delgado-Agu- ilar M, Mutjé P (2017) Reducing the amount of catalyst in TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers: Effect on proper- ties and cost. Polymers 9(11):557. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ polym 91105 57 Shibata I, Isogai A (2003) Depolymerization of cellouronic acid during TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Cellulose 10(2):151–158. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1023/A: 10240 51514 026 Shinoda R, Saito T, Okita Y, Isogai A (2012) Relationship between length and degree of polymerization of TEMPO- oxidized cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromol 13(3):842– 849. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ bm201 7542 Sun B, Gu CJ, Ma JH, Liang BR (2005) Kinetic study on TEMPO-mediated selective oxidation of regenerated cel- lulose. Cellulose 12(1):59–66. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1023/B: CELL. 00000 49409. 56806. da Tahiri C, Vignon MR (2000) TEMPO-oxidation of cellulose: Synthesis and characterisation of polyglucuronans. Cellu- lose 7(2):177–188. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1023/A: 10092 76009 711 Tang Z, Li W, Lin X, Xiao H, Miao Q, Huang L (2017) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose with high degree of oxidation. Polymers 9(9):421. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ polym 90904 21 TAPPI (2016). TAPPI T 211 om-16:2016 Ash in Wood, Pulp, Paper and Paperboard: Combustion at 525 Degrees C. Peachtree Corners, GA. TAPPI (2017). TAPPI T 204 cm-17:2017 Solvent Extractives of Wood and Pulp. Peachtree Corners, GA. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01622a014 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01622a014 https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202001180 https://doi.org/10.1021/ie901039r https://doi.org/10.1021/ie901039r https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.2.4075-4092 https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.2.4075-4092 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016 https://doi.org/10.1021/bm100214b https://doi.org/10.1021/bm100214b https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0497769 https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0497769 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-004-5835-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-004-5835-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.04.038 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.04.038 https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0703970 https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0703970 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-009-1092-7 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60507-3 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60507-3 https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202000277 https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202000277 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9110557 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9110557 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024051514026 https://doi.org/10.1021/bm2017542 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CELL.0000049409.56806.da https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CELL.0000049409.56806.da https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009276009711 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009276009711 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090421 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090421 Optimization of reagent consumption in TEMPO-mediated oxidation of Eucalyptus cellulose to obtain cellulose nanofibers Abstract Graphical abstract Introduction Materials and methods Materials TEMPO-mediated oxidation reaction Characterization of the initial and oxidized pulp Cellulose nanofibrils production and characterization Results and discussion Evaluation of NaClO dose with the oxidation time Study of TEMPO and NaBr doses with the oxidation time Study of reaction rate coefficient as a function of catalyst doses Study of catalyst costs and selection of the optimal doses Conclusions Acknowledgments References