World Journal of Psychiatry ISSN 2220-3206 (online) World J Psychiatry 2022 April 19; 12(4): 541-650 Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc WJP https://www.wjgnet.com I April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 World Journal of PsychiatryW J P Contents Monthly Volume 12 Number 4 April 19, 2022 REVIEW Abnormal synaptic plasticity and impaired cognition in schizophrenia541 Wu XL, Yan QJ, Zhu F Anorexia nervosa: Outpatient treatment and medical management558 Frostad S, Bentz M MINIREVIEWS Effects of antiseizure medications on alternative psychosis and strategies for their application580 Yan Y, Wu JH, Peng XY, Wang XF Role of serendipity in the discovery of classical antidepressant drugs: Applying operational criteria and patterns of discovery 588 López-Muñoz F, D’Ocón P, Romero A, Guerra JA, Álamo C ORIGINAL ARTICLE Observational Study Dimensional (premenstrual symptoms screening tool) vs categorical (mini diagnostic interview, module U) for assessment of premenstrual disorders 603 Chamali R, Emam R, Mahfoud ZR, Al-Amin H SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS Lidocaine in fibromyalgia: A systematic review615 de Carvalho JF, Skare TL Psychiatric comorbidities in cancer survivors across tumor subtypes: A systematic review623 Bach A, Knauer K, Graf J, Schäffeler N, Stengel A META-ANALYSIS Effects of mindfulness-based intervention programs on sleep among people with common mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis 636 Chan SHW, Lui D, Chan H, Sum K, Cheung A, Yip H, Yu CH WJP https://www.wjgnet.com II April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 World Journal of Psychiatry Contents Monthly Volume 12 Number 4 April 19, 2022 ABOUT COVER Peer Reviewer of World Journal of Psychiatry, Sunny Ho-Wan Chan, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong. sunny.hw.chan@polyu.edu.hk AIMS AND SCOPE The primary aim of World Journal of Psychiatry (WJP, World J Psychiatry) is to provide scholars and readers from various fields of psychiatry with a platform to publish high-quality basic and clinical research articles and communicate their research findings online.     WJP mainly publishes articles reporting research results and findings obtained in the field of psychiatry and covering a wide range of topics including adolescent psychiatry, biological psychiatry, child psychiatry, community psychiatry, ethnopsychology, psychoanalysis, psychosomatic medicine, etc. INDEXING/ABSTRACTING The WJP is now abstracted and indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE, also known as SciSearch®), Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, PubMed, and PubMed Central. The 2021 edition of Journal Citation Reports® cites the 2020 impact factor (IF) for WJP as 4.571; IF without journal self cites: 4.429; 5-year IF: 7.697; Journal Citation Indicator: 0.73; Ranking: 46 among 156 journals in psychiatry; and Quartile category: Q2. RESPONSIBLE EDITORS FOR THIS ISSUE Production Editor: Hua-Ge Yu; Production Department Director: Xu Guo; Editorial Office Director: Jia-Ping Yan. NAME OF JOURNAL INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS World Journal of Psychiatry https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/204 ISSN GUIDELINES FOR ETHICS DOCUMENTS ISSN 2220-3206 (online) https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/GerInfo/287 LAUNCH DATE GUIDELINES FOR NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS OF ENGLISH December 31, 2011 https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/240 FREQUENCY PUBLICATION ETHICS Monthly https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/GerInfo/288 EDITORS-IN-CHIEF PUBLICATION MISCONDUCT Rajesh R Tampi, Ting-Shao Zhu, Panteleimon Giannakopoulos https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/208 EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGE https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/editorialboard.htm https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/242 PUBLICATION DATE STEPS FOR SUBMITTING MANUSCRIPTS April 19, 2022 https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/GerInfo/239 COPYRIGHT ONLINE SUBMISSION © 2022 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc https://www.f6publishing.com © 2022 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA E-mail: bpgoffice@wjgnet.com https://www.wjgnet.com https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/204 https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/GerInfo/287 https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/240 https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/GerInfo/288 https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/208 https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/editorialboard.htm https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/242 https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/GerInfo/239 https://www.f6publishing.com mailto:bpgoffice@wjgnet.com https://www.wjgnet.com WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 588 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 World Journal of PsychiatryW J P Submit a Manuscript: https://www.f6publishing.com World J Psychiatry 2022 April 19; 12(4): 588-602 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i4.588 ISSN 2220-3206 (online) MINIREVIEWS Role of serendipity in the discovery of classical antidepressant drugs: Applying operational criteria and patterns of discovery Francisco López-Muñoz, Pilar D’Ocón, Alejandro Romero, José A Guerra, Cecilio Álamo Specialty type: Psychiatry Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed. Peer-review model: Single blind Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification Grade A (Excellent): A Grade B (Very good): B Grade C (Good): 0 Grade D (Fair): 0 Grade E (Poor): 0 P-Reviewer: Contreras CM, Mexico; Norman TR, Australia Received: September 6, 2021 Peer-review started: September 6, 2021 First decision: November 8, 2021 Revised: November 22, 2021 Accepted: March 14, 2022 Article in press: March 14, 2022 Published online: April 19, 2022 Francisco López-Muñoz, Faculty of Health, University Camilo José Cela, Villanueva de la Cañada 28692, Madrid, Spain Francisco López-Muñoz, “Hospital 12 de Octubre” Research Institute (i+12), Avda. de Córdoba, s/n, Madrid 28041, Spain Pilar D’Ocón, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Valencia, Avda. Vicent Andres Estelles, s/n, Valencia 46100, Spain Alejandro Romero, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Complutense University, Avda. Puerta de Hierro, s/n, Madrid 28040, Spain José A Guerra, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Complutense University, Pl. de Ramón y Cajal, s/n, Madrid 28040, Spain Cecilio Álamo, Department of Biomedical Sciences (Pharmacology Area), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Campus Científico-Tecnológico, Crta. de Madrid- Barcelona, Alcalá de Henares 28871, Madrid, Spain Corresponding author: Francisco López-Muñoz, MD, PhD, Chief Doctor, Dean, Director, Faculty of Health, University Camilo José Cela, C/ Castillo de Alarcón 49, Villanueva de la Cañada 28692, Madrid, Spain. flopez@ucjc.edu Abstract The role played by serendipity in the origin of modern psychopharmacology has proven to be controversial in scientific literature. In its original meaning (Walpole), serendipity refers to discoveries made through a combination of accidents and sagacity. We have implemented an operational definition of serendipity based on finding something unexpected or unintended, regardless of the systematic process that led to the accidental observation, and we have established four different patterns of serendipitous attributability. In this paper, we have analyzed the role of serendipity in the discovery and development of classical antidepressant drugs, tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors as well as heterocyclic, “atypical” or “second generation” antide- pressants. The discovery of the antidepressant properties of imipramine and iproniazid, the prototypes of tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors, respectively, fits the mixed type II pattern; initial serendipitous discoveries (imipramine was an antipsychotic and iproniazid was an anti- tuberculosis agent) led secondarily to non-serendipitous discoveries. But the other https://www.f6publishing.com https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v12.i4.588 mailto:flopez@ucjc.edu López-Muñoz F et al. Serendipity and classical antidepressant drugs WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 589 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 components of these two families of drugs were developed specifically as antidepressants, modifying the chemical structure of the series leaders, thereby allowing all of them to be included in the type IV pattern, characterized by the complete absence of serendipity. Among the hetero- cyclic drugs, mianserin (originally developed as an antihistamine) also falls into the type II pattern. Key Words: Serendipity; Antidepressants; Imipramine; Iproniazid; Psychopharmacology; History of neurosciences ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. Core Tip: In this paper, we have analyzed, for the first time, the role of serendipity in the discovery and development of classical antidepressant drugs through our operational definition of serendipity. We have assigned each of the classic antidepressants its corresponding pattern of serendipitous attributability according to four different patterns. Citation: López-Muñoz F, D’Ocón P, Romero A, Guerra JA, Álamo C. Role of serendipity in the discovery of classical antidepressant drugs: Applying operational criteria and patterns of discovery. World J Psychiatry 2022; 12(4): 588-602 URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v12/i4/588.htm DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v12.i4.588 INTRODUCTION The era of modern psychopharmacology began in the late 1940s, with the publication of the antimanic effects of lithium by Australian psychiatrist Cade[1]. However, it was in the 1950s that what has come to be known as the “psychopharmacological revolution”[2] came into being, with the introduction of the large families of pharmacological agents that are still in use today: typical neuroleptics or antipsychotics, benzodiazepine anxiolytics and the two large groups of classic antidepressants, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs)[3]. All of these psychotropic drugs drastically changed the state of psychiatric care, starting from a fundamentally empirical therapeutic approach, which nevertheless allowed for a gradual understanding of some of the neurobiological bases of mental illnesses and how to treat them. The year 1957 should be regarded as a key date in modern psychiatry, as this was the year when the first two specific antidepressant drugs in history were introduced into clinical practice, belonging to two completely different pharmacological families and two completely different geographical areas of research. Iproniazid, an MAOI agent, was the result of a research process developed in the United States, and imipramine, the prototypical representative of the TCA family, was developed and studied in Europe[4]. Prior to the clinical introduction of these antidepressant agents, the therapeutic tools used to manage affective disorders were extremely limited[5]. At the beginning of the 20th century, chloral hydrate, barbiturates, amphetamines and opiate derivatives were used in agitated melancholic patients. During the first half of the century, excluding biological treatments (insulin comas, chemical, electrical shock therapies, and “sleep cures”), there were only a few nonspecific chemical preparations available to doctors, such as dinitrile succinate, malonic nitrite and lactic acid, all of which had rather unsatis- factory antidepressant results[6,7] confirmed in the few clinical studies carried out. However, this was also due in part to Freudian ideas prevalent until the 1950s that depressive syndromes had only psycho- dynamic, not biological, causes, meaning that these patients could not benefit from treatment with pharmacological agents[8,9]. In the specific field of antidepressant drugs, TCA agents that ushered in a new era in the treatment of depression are still the benchmarks today, especially in clinical research, and have the same efficacy rates as other antidepressants that have appeared since then. However, unlike TCAs, which continue to be used in clinical practice though not as a first-line treatment, the use of MAOIs has largely fallen off, due primarily to their adverse effects and problems of interactions with other psychostimulant drugs and tyramine-rich foods, which can lead to tragic hypertensive crises. However, atypical depressions are still candidates for treatment with these drugs. During the 1970s, new heterocyclic antidepressants appeared, known at the time as “atypical” or “second generation” antidepressants (maprotiline, mianserin, trazodone, viloxazine, nomifensine). The main characteristic of which was that they were more selective in their action on monoaminergic transmission systems. All of these drugs can be categorized as traditional antidepressants (Table 1). https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v12/i4/588.htm https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v12.i4.588 López-Muñoz F et al. Serendipity and classical antidepressant drugs WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 590 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 Table 1 Classification of classical monoaminergic antidepressants according to action mechanism and historical perspective on their clinical introduction Family Mechanisms of action Acronym Prototype substance Period Tricyclic antidepressants 5-HT and NA reuptake inhibitors with blocking action of diverse receptors TCA Imipramine 1957- 1980 Monoamine oxidase inhibitors Irreversible MAO inhibitors MAOI Phenelzine 1958- 1965 Heterocyclic or “second generation” antide- pressants NA reuptake inhibitors with blocking action of diverse receptors Maprotiline 1967- 1980 Antagonists of α2 auto-receptors Mianserin 1970- 1980 DA and NA reuptake inhibitors Nomifensine 1970- 1980 5-HT reuptake inhibitor and antagonist of 5-HT2 receptors Trazodone 1970- 1980 5-HT: Serotonin; NA: Norepinephrine; DA: Dopamine; TCAs: Tricyclic antidepressants; MAOIs: Monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Finally, in the late 1980s, a new series of drug families were introduced into clinical practice, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, which were widely used and accepted. These drugs offered considerable advantages over their predecessors, particularly in terms of safety and tolerability, and opened up the field of antidepressant therapy to non-psychiatrists. The first selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor was zimelidine, which was withdrawn from the market, but we can say that the period of “modern” antidepressants began with the successful clinical introduction of fluoxetine[10]. Serendipity may have played a crucial role in the process of discovering classic psychotropic drugs during the 1950s[11,12], although opinions in scientific literature in recent decades are rather contra- dictory possibly due to a lack of consensus on what is meant by serendipity. In the specific field of science, this concept has traditionally been associated with those discoveries or findings of a fortunate and unexpected nature, fortuitous events or accidental encounters (“happy accident,” “pleasant surprise,” etc.), although its meaning has also been linked to the very concept of chance, randomness or coincidence. The differences in opinion about the role of serendipity or chance discoveries in science may lie in the semantic ambiguity of the term “serendipity.” The origin of which can be traced to correspondence between the English writer, politician and historian Horace Walpole, 4th Earl of Oxford and the British diplomat Sir Horace Mann. One epistle in this fluid correspondence, which refers to the classic Persian tale The Three Princes of Serendip, contains the two components that should make up the concept of serendipity: accidents and sagacity[13]. Therefore, it is sagacity that marks the difference between serendipitous discovery and the absence of discovery in the presence of relevant accidental information. But is not sagacity a basic and indispensable component of the scientific mentality itself? If the answer is yes, this element must be present irrespective of whether the phenomena observed in the scientific discovery were foreseen or not. However, we have postulated that there is a structural difference in this approach. Sagacity always precedes and leads observation in non-serendipitous discoveries, but in serendipitous discoveries, sagacity manifests itself after the unexpected observation has been made. However, even this assessment leads to interpretative problems as once scientists have made their discovery, they tend to explain them as a consequence of perfectly planned working hypotheses even when they take place in a completely random way. Thus, from a conceptual point of view, we can conclude that serendipitous discovery is the discovery of something unsought, regardless of the systematic process that led to the accidental observation. Viewed in this light, serendipity is undoubtedly a key factor in the creative process in the arts and humanities[14,15]. However, it can also be seen as an integral part of the development of social sciences and of course of biomedical sciences in general and psychopharmacology in particular. Kubinyi[16] briefly analyzed the discoveries of different pharmacological agents in which serendipity was somehow involved, and Hargrave-Thomas et al[17] confirmed that 24% of all commercially available drugs were positively influenced by serendipity during their development, particularly psychopharmaceuticals. In this sense, the discovery of most of the psychopharmacological agents that revolutionized the care of mental illnesses during the 1950s has not escaped this conceptualization either[13]. However, although the researchers responsible for these discoveries have themselves reported that chance was a key factor in their findings, the role of serendipity in the early days of psychopharmacology is still far from being established. López-Muñoz F et al. Serendipity and classical antidepressant drugs WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 591 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 To address this point further, we have established an operational definition of serendipity based on four different patterns of attributability[13,18], which allows us to reflect on the actual role that serendipity played in the findings that shaped the origins of modern psychopharmacology. In this paper following this approach, we will look at the role played by serendipity in the discovery of the classic antidepressant drugs. PATTERNS OF SERENDIPITOUS ATTRIBUTABILITY In previous papers[13,18], we have proposed a standardized definition for the term serendipity in the field of science, given the semantic ambiguity of this concept. This “operational” definition would establish that serendipity is the discovery of something not sought. Moreover, we have proposed a working definition of serendipity[13,18] based on four different patterns of serendipitous imputation in the drug discovery process (Figure 1): (1) The first pattern, which would encompass pure serendipitous discoveries, was more frequent in the first half of the 20th century; (2) The second pattern, which is a variant of the previous one, would correspond to those initial serendipitous discoveries that secondarily lead to non-serendipitous discoveries; (3) The third pattern would include non-serendipitous discoveries that are secondarily partnered with serendipitous discoveries; and (4) The fourth pattern of non-serendipitous discoveries, in line with our operational definition of finding something unsought, has become more and more frequent since the second half of the last century. In the latter pattern, beyond serendipity, drugs evolved out of systematic research programs specifically designed to develop effective drugs for different pathological conditions. Mixed discoveries (patterns 2 and 3) were very common towards the middle of the 20th century (coinciding with the so-called “golden decade” of psychopharmacology in the 1950s) and were charac- terized by initial serendipitous discoveries (in some cases in laboratory animals) leading secondarily to non-serendipitous discoveries and vice versa. Prior to applying the attributability criteria, a detailed historical study of the development process of each of the antidepressant drugs analyzed was carried out, using the original articles in which the first pharmacological and clinical data on these drugs were published. This was done using most important databases in this field (Medline, Embase, Scopus), the documentation services of the pharmaceutical companies that have marketed these drugs and the documentation available in the Network for the History of Neuropsychopharmacology, coordinated by Thomas A. Ban (Vanderbilt University), the series of interviews entitled The Psychopharmacologists, by David Healy (Arnold-Oxford University Press), the History of Psychopharmacology collection of the Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychophar- macologicum, coordinated by Thomas A. Ban, David Healy and Edward Shorter and edited by Animula and the documentary background on the history of psychopharmacology by Prof. López-Muñoz. SERENDIPITY IN THE PROCESS OF DISCOVERY OF CLASSICAL ANTIDEPRESSANT DRUGS Discovery of the antidepressant properties of imipramine and TCAs The history of the clinical introduction of the first antidepressant drug (from the family of TCA), imipramine, was part of a search for antipsychotic drugs[19,20], following the therapeutic success reported with the clinical introduction of chlorpromazine[21] and reserpine, an alkaloid from Rauwolfia serpentina[22] in 1952 (Figure 2). See López-Muñoz et al[23-25] for details. These developments intensified the search for substances with similar properties by pharmaceutical companies. Accordingly, the pharmaceutical company J.R. Geigy (Basel) dusted off some phenothiazine substances that it had initially tried to develop unsuccessfully as dyes[8] and later on as antihistamines and hypnotics in the hope that they might have some other psychiatric benefit[8,9,26]. In this context, the Swiss psychiatrist Roland Kuhn, deputy medical director at the Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic in Münsterlingen (near Lake Constance), who had already studied the hypnotic and neuroleptic properties of certain Geigy phenothiazine agents[26,27], asked the Swiss company for new compounds from the phenothiazine family to test them in his psychotic patients. In early 1956, Kuhn received a preparation called G-22355, a substance with the same side chain as chlorpromazine, which had been synthesized by Franz Häfliger and Walter Schindler in 1948 from promethazine by replacing the sulfur bridge of phenothiazine with an ethylene bridge[28]. The substance had been registered in 1951 under United States license number 2554736[29]. Kuhn’s extensive clinical research in 1956 soon showed that the agent G-22355 had no appreciable neuroleptic activity. Even patients who had previously been treated with chlorpromazine developed more severe psychotic symptoms not schizophrenic and became clinically disturbed and agitated[30]. However, Kuhn observed that 3 patients diagnosed with depressive psychosis showed a pronounced improvement in their general condition in just a few weeks. The antidepressant effect of this substance, later named imipramine, was therefore completely unexpected and its discovery entirely accidental. In López-Muñoz F et al. Serendipity and classical antidepressant drugs WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 592 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 Figure 1 Diagram of the four patterns of serendipitous attribution in the discovery of pharmacological agents. 1They usually, but not always, relate to findings in laboratory animals; 2Findings relating to clinical efficacy. Figure 2 Historical process of the discovery of tricyclic antidepressants during the 1950s. TCAs: Tricyclic antidepressants. this regard, the possibility that this substance could have a therapeutic antidepressant effect was first raised by Kuhn in a written communication to Geigy dated February 4, 1956[31]. Subsequently, a further 37 patients with depressive disorders received this drug, demonstrating its particular efficacy in treating depressive disorders[26,32,33]: “The patients appear, in general, more animated, their voices, previously weak and depressed, now sound louder; they are more communicative, the lamentations and sobbing have disappeared. The depression, which had manifested itself through sadness, irritation and a sensation of disaffection, now gave way to friendly, joyous and accessible feelings”[32]. Kuhn presented his results at the 2nd International Congress of Psychiatry in Zurich in September 1957 to an audience of just 12 people, using the data obtained from the clinical follow-up of these 40 depressed patients. The proceedings of the conference were published in the August issue of the Schwizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift[32]. However, the following year, Kuhn republished his data (with a larger sample of patients) in the American Journal of Psychiatry[33], thereby making his discovery internationally known. In this paper, Kuhn extensively described the pharmaco- logical effects, data on efficacy and the adverse effects of imipramine and provided recommendations for its clinical use, dosage and duration of treatment. In this work, Kuhn stated that “the patients got up in the morning voluntarily, they spoke in louder voices, with greater fluency and their facial expression became more lively. They began to do some individual activities, they once more sought to make contact with other people, they began to train on their own, to participate in games, to become happier, López-Muñoz F et al. Serendipity and classical antidepressant drugs WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 593 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 and to recover their ability to laugh”[33]. Geigy introduced imipramine to the local Swiss market at the end of 1957 under the trade name of Tofranil®. It was subsequently introduced in the rest of the European market in the spring of 1958[8,29] and represented a giant step forward in the treatment of depression, being the first representative of a new family of drugs, known as imipraminic or TCAs. Kuhn had the sagacity to recognize an antidepressant drug when looking for an antipsychotic drug. Kuhn himself commented: “Chance admittedly had something to do with the discovery of imipramine. Chance was not decisive, however, to this had to be added a measure of intellectual achievement that was able to “invent” something completely new, something hitherto unknown, namely a new disease. Göthe put the sense of the matter in a nutshell when he wrote: ‘Discovery needs luck, invention, intellect–neither can do without the other’”[34]. Something similar pointed more than a century ago the great Louis Pasteur: "In the realm of scientific observation, luck is granted only to those who are prepared"[35]. The discovery of the antidepressant properties of imipramine is a representative example of how a serendipitous finding, the observation of schizophrenic patients treated with this drug looking for an antipsychotic effect, leads to a planned and non-serendipitous discovery, i.e. the antidepressant effect. Therefore, the antidepressant effect of imipramine would fit into the type II pattern of our serendipitous attributability criteria. This pattern of a mixture of serendipitous and non-serendipitous findings was possibly the most common during the early stages of modern psychopharmacology. But it is precisely this dual quality that has been a major source of controversy in attributing serendipity to psychophar- macological discoveries. Despite the remarkable success of imipramine, the next TCA, amitriptyline, was not introduced to the market until 1961. This molecule was also investigated as an antipsychotic by the pharmaceutical company Merck and Co. For this, they made modifications in the central ring of the thioxanthene family, and in this way, they got the first compound of the dibenzocycloheptadiene group[36]. Merck commissioned Frank J. Ayd Jr., one of the American pioneers in the study of chlorpromazine, to conduct clinical research on this new compound. But Ayd tried it as an antidepressant, following in the wake of imipramine. Ayd treated 130 patients at Baltimore Square Hospital with amitriptyline and found that the antidepressant effect was similar to that of imipramine. The Food and Drug Administration approved amitriptyline for marketing as an antidepressant on April 7, 1961 and it received the trade name Elavil®. This molecule would retain some of the tranquillizing effects of thioxanthenes, thus displacing imipramine in the treatment of patients with agitated or anxious depression. The introduction of amitriptyline, the second tricyclic agent, by Merck and Co. increased the confidence in these drugs of both general practitioners and specialists. Thanks to the commercial strength of these two pharmaceutical companies and a marketing agreement between them (the joint marketing of both products, Elavil Merck and Tryptizol Roche worldwide, except in the United States where it was only marketed by Merck), amitriptyline quickly became the most prescribed antide- pressant at the time. Simultaneously, Hoffmann-La Roche and H. Lundbeck and Co. had succeeded in synthesizing amitriptyline by modifying the chemical structure of imipramine accordingly. Although due to the priority of their application, Roche received the European marketing rights under the name Saroten® [37]. The discovery of the antidepressant properties of imipramine and its commercial success led to the development of a number of compounds with similar structures and activities (now called “me-too” compounds) in order to identify specific comparative advantages[38]. This subsequently became quite common practice in the field of pharmacological therapeutics. As a result, a number of TCAs were developed during the 1960s. In 1963, nortriptyline was approved in Britain under the name Allegron®, while in the United States it was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in November 1964, when desipramine (J.R. Geigy), the principal urinary metabolite of imipramine, was also approved; in 1966, trimipramine was introduced in Britain and other European countries under the name Surmontil®. These agents were followed by other TCAs: in 1966 by protriptyline (called Concordin® in Europe and Vivactil® in the United States); in 1967 by iprindole (Prondol®); in 1969 by dothiepin (Prothiaden®), an agent not approved in the United States; doxepin[39], introduced onto the European market by Galenus (Aponal®), a subsidiary of Boehringer, and in the United States by Pfizer (Sinequan®) [40]; and clomipramine (Anafranil®), introduced in Europe in 1970, which was not approved in the United States. All components of the TCA series were developed specifically as antidepressant agents, following in the wake of imipramine and modifying its chemical structure, so they can all be included in the type IV pattern of our serendipitous attribution criteria, in which neither chance nor sagacity played a part (Table 2). Discovery of the antidepressant properties of iproniazid and non-selective MAOIs The origin of the first specific antidepressant drugs, MAOIs, can be traced back to hydrazide anti- tuberculosis agents, which had been used since the early 1950s[5,41] (Figure 3). In 1952, Selikoff et al[42] began to study the clinical effects of iproniazid at Sea View Hospital on Staten Island (New York). They observed that compared to isoniazid iproniazid had a greater stimulatory power on the central nervous López-Muñoz F et al. Serendipity and classical antidepressant drugs WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 594 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 Table 2 Attribution of serendipity in the discovery of classical antidepressant drugs Group/Family Drug ATC code Date of discovery (psychiatric introduction) Effect/primary properties1 Effect/secondary properties2 Pattern of discovery TCAs Imipramine N06AA02 1951 (1957) S NS II Amitriptyline N06AA09 1958 (1961) NS NS IV Trimipramine N06AA06 1964 (1966) NS NS IV Butriptyline N06AA15 1964 NS NS IV Desipramine N06AA01 1964 NS NS IV Clomipramine N06AA04 1963 (1970) NS NS IV Nortriptyline N06AA10 1963 (1967) NS NS IV Protriptyline N06AA11 1967 NS NS IV Iprindole N06AA13 1967 NS NS IV Doxepin N06AA12 1969 NS NS IV Dibenzepin N06AA08 1970 NS NS IV Maprotiline3 N06AA21 1967 (1973) NS NS IV Dosulepin N06AA16 1977 NS NS IV Amineptine N06AA19 1978 NS NS IV Amoxapine N06AA17 1980 NS NS IV Quinupramine N06AA23 1983 NS NS IV Lofepramine N06AA07 1989 NS NS IV MAOI Iproniazid N06AF05 1952 (1957) S NS II Isocarboxazid N06AF01 1959 NS NS IV Phenelzine N06AF03 1960 NS NS IV Tranylcypromine N06AF04 1961 NS NS IV Nialamide N06AF02 1988 NS NS IV OCA Trazodone N06AX05 1966 (1973) NS NS IV Nomifensine N06AX04 1977 NS NS IV Mianserin N06AX03 1966 (1979) S NS II 1Usually, but not always, correspond to discoveries in laboratory animals. 2Discoveries related to clinical efficacy. 3Maprotiline is the first tetracyclic antidepressant and is included in the group of “second generation antidepressants.” Antidepressant drugs were classified by the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system controlled by the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Drugs Statistics Methodology. This system classifies the active ingredient of a drug into groups according to the organ or system on which they have their effect. https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/?code=N06AX&showdescription=no. NS: Non-serendipitous discovery; S: Serendipitous discovery; TCAs: Tricyclic antidepressants; MAOIs: Monoamine oxidase inhibitors; OCA: Other classical antidepressants; ATC: Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical. system, an effect initially interpreted as a secondary effect of the preparation[42]. The psychological changes observed in tuberculosis patients treated with iproniazid were particularly striking[5,8,43]; these patients showed increased vitality, even a desire to leave the hospital and a gradual increase in social activity. In other types of patients treated with iproniazid, such as patients with rheumatoid arthritis or cancer, similar psychostimulant effects were also observed[44]. But the adverse effects of iproniazid, observed in the first clinical trials with tuberculosis patients, were more frequent than in the case of isoniazid. Therefore, it was abandoned, except for specific cases, such as that of David M. Bosworth, Director of the Department of Orthopedics at St. Luke’s and Polyclinic Hospital (New York), who continued to defend the use of iproniazid in bone tuberculosis [45]. But a few astute clinicians saw a “primary effect” in the psycho-stimulant type of “secondary effect” discussed above, which could be useful in other types of patients, mainly of a psychiatric nature. This was the case of Jackson A. Smith (Baylor University, Waco, Texas), who, evaluating the “tranquil- https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/?code=N06AX&showdescription=no López-Muñoz F et al. Serendipity and classical antidepressant drugs WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 595 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 Figure 3 Historical process of the discovery of monoamine oxidase inhibitors during the 1950s. APA: American Psychiatric Association; MAOI: Monoamine oxidase inhibitors. lizing” effect of iproniazid observed that of a group of 11 patients treated for 2 wk with this drug, 2 of them experienced a certain improvement (increased appetite, weight gain, increased vitality and improved sleep)[46]. The same was true of Gordon R. Kamman, of the University of Minnesota (Twin Cities)[47] and Carlos Castilla del Pino of the University of Cordoba in Spain, who described the euphoriant and mood-elevating effects of hydrazide therapy in tuberculosis patients[48]. Some studies were even published assessing the mood elevating effect of isoniazid in psychiatric patients[49-51]. In fact, one of these researchers, Max Lurie (Cincinnati), may have coined the term “antidepressant” precisely to describe the effect that this drug had on depressed patients[52]. The year 1957 was fundamental in the history of hydrazide drugs as antidepressants, as the first data on the effects of iproniazid on depression were presented at a meeting of the American Psychiatric Association in Syracuse in April of that year. Although its use was much more limited than isoniazid, George Crane of Montefiore Hospital in New York reported improvement in the mood of 11 out of 20 tuberculosis patients with concomitant depression[53], as did Frank Ayd, an intern at Taylor Manor Hospital in Baltimore[54]. However, these researchers never mentioned iproniazid as an “antide- pressant” agent. Meanwhile, Nathan S. Kline and his colleagues (Harry P. Loomer and John C. Saunders) from Rockland State Hospital (Orangeburg, New York), who were aware of the work of Charles Scott’s team at Warner-Lambert Research Laboratories (Morris Plains, New Jersey) particularly the ability of iproniazid to prevent reserpine-induced immobility in mice[55], were the first psychiatrists to assess the efficacy of iproniazid in non-tuberculous depressed patients (chronic psychotic depression). They performed the same procedures on humans as Scott had done on animals. For their study, they recruited 17 severely inhibited patients with schizophrenia and 7 patients with depression from Kline’s private practice and gave them a dose of iproniazid 50 mg, 3 times a day. Their results revealed the stimulating effect of iproniazid on depressed patients; 70% of the patients treated with this drug experienced a great improvement, including increased mood, increased appetite and increased interpersonal skills, interest in the environment and in themselves. These same effects were already provided at the Syracuse Meeting, although they were not released until a few years later when they were published[56]. In 1957, Kline[57] published the first neuropsychiatric experiments with iproniazid (previously reported at the American Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting in Syracuse) during a meeting of the Committee on Appropriations of the United States Senate in May[57], proposing the term “physic energizer” to designate the activity of this drug[58]. Two years later, Werner Janzarik proposed at a symposium held in Montreal the use of the term “thymerethics,” i.e. compounds that act by increasing the stimulatory effects, to refer to all those drugs with effects similar to the new MAOIs. Although iproniazid was only authorized (with the trade name of Marsilid) for the treatment of tuberculosis patients, its use in depressive patients was massive. Only 1 year after the Syracuse Meeting, López-Muñoz F et al. Serendipity and classical antidepressant drugs WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 596 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 it was estimated that more than 400000 patients with depression were treated with iproniazid[59]. This opened the door to a group of specifically antidepressant drugs, later known as MAOIs, due to the research of Ernst Albert Zeller’s team at Northwestern University Medical School (Chicago, Illinois). It was known in 1952 that iproniazid was able to inhibit MAO[60]. Despite all this, iproniazid was withdrawn from the United States market in 1961 following allegations that it induced a number of cases of jaundice and nephrotoxicity. Serendipity played an important role in the discovery of iproniazid[11]. Thanks to the sagacity of healthcare professionals dedicated to the care of tuberculosis patients, it was realized that certain “secondary effects” of anti-tuberculosis medication of a psychostimulant nature, which appeared by chance, could be useful in psychiatric patients diagnosed with depressive disorders. Therefore, this would fall under a type II pattern under our serendipitous attribution criteria. Iproniazid soon gave way to other agents with much higher MAO inhibitory potency[61], such as Hoffman-LaRoche’s isocarboxazid (Marplan®), marketed in 1959, phenelzine developed by Warner- Lambert (Nardil®)[62], which became available in 1960, and tranylcypromine (Smith, Kline & French) (Parnate®)[63,64], which entered the market in 1961, as well as other hydrazine derivatives (nialamide, mebanazine and pheniprazine) and indole derivatives (etryptamine)[65,66]. The origin of this agent, synthesized in 1948 by Alfred Burger and William L. Yost, is part of the search for new analogues of amphetamines (trans,dl-2 phenylcyclopropylamine sulfate)[67], although its MAOI activity was discovered much later in 1959 by Smith, Kline & French Laboratories[63,68]. Indeed, the fact that tranyl- cypromine was not a hydrazine derivative aroused some clinical interest, and it was speculated that it could have a better hepatic safety profile than that of other MAOIs known to date[69]. But tranylcypromine was also withdrawn from the United States market in 1964, albeit for other safety reasons, when an increase in the number of drug-related hypertensive crises, some of them linked to intracranial subarachnoid hemorrhages, was reported. It was reintroduced in the same year at the request of specialists and is still in use today. Thanks to the contributions of Barry Blackwell, then a resident consultant in psychiatry at the Maudsley Hospital in London, it was confirmed that these crises were triggered by the concomitant consumption of certain cheeses, given their high tyramine content, hence the term “cheese effect”[70]. The link between the hypertensive crises described by Blackwell and the consumption of tyramine-rich foods is also a clear example of the phenomenon of “serendipity” in psychiatry, according to Blackwell himself[71]. A hospital pharmacist in Nottingham, called G.E.F. Rowe, read an article published by Blackwell[70] in 1963 in The Lancet on tranylcypromine and its adverse effects[70] and noted that the symptomatology described was alarmingly similar to that experienced by his own wife when she consumed certain cheeses. These episodes were described in detail in a letter Rowe sent to Blackwell, who was alerted to this dangerous association. Many other foods (yeast products, chicken liver, snails, pickled herring, red wines, some varieties of beer, canned figs, beans, chocolate and cream products, etc.) were subsequently found to contain indirectly acting amines (mainly tyramine), which could also cause hypertensive episodes in patients treated with MAOIs. After the use of iproniazid as an antidepressant, the other agents in this family were incorporated into the antidepressant therapeutic arsenal thanks to recognition of their MAO inhibitory effect, meaning that they would fall into the type IV pattern under our serendipitous attribution criteria, where chance no longer played a role (Table 2). Heterocyclic or “second-generation” antidepressants During the 1960s, many changes were made to the dibenzazepine structure of imipramine in order to obtain new antidepressants with superior efficacy and/or an improved adverse effect profile. As a result, the tetracyclic, heterocyclic or “second generation antidepressants”[36], such as maprotiline (Ludiomil®), marketed by Ciba-Geigy in Europe and Japan in 1972[8], mianserin (Tolvon®), nomifensine (Merital®) and trazodone (Desyrel®), were developed. Compared to the classic TCAs, which had a very unspecific mechanism of action [serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition with blocking action of diverse receptors][72], these drugs had a slightly cleaner pharmacodynamic profile. The first tetracyclic antidepressant was maprotiline, developed as an antidepressant by Max Wilhelm and Paul Schmidt in 1967 at Ciba. However, the four rings of its chemical structure are not fused together as is the case with other tetracyclic antidepressants. Clinical trials of this agent were also conducted by Kuhn[73]. By contrast, nomifensine is a tetrahydoisoquinoline antidepressant that is not chemically related to TCAs, MAOIs or heterocyclic antidepressants. It is a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor developed as an antidepressant in the 1960s. The pharmacological effects of nomifensine were similar to those of TCAs in animal models of depression but with a much lower rate of sedation[74]. However, it was withdrawn from the market in 1986 due to safety concerns (immune related hemolytic anemia), including some cases of dependence, given its similar mechanism of action to psychoactive drugs such as cocaine. As far as trazodone is concerned, it is now known to have a dual mechanism of action whereby it inhibits the serotonin transporter and blocks the 5-HT2 serotonin receptors (both the 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors). But, like TCAs, it also exerts an antagonistic effect on α1- and α2-adrenergic receptors and histamine H1 receptors, with almost no anticholinergic effects[75]. It was discovered in Italy in 1966 at Angelini Research Laboratories by Gorecki and Verbeeck[76] and developed as a second generation López-Muñoz F et al. Serendipity and classical antidepressant drugs WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 597 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 antidepressant following the then current “mental pain” hypothesis, which postulated that clinical depression was associated with a reduced pain threshold[77]. Trazodone was patented and marketed in many countries around the world from 1973 and approved by the Food and Drug Administration as the first non-TCA, non-MAOI antidepressant in 1981. These three compounds can be included in our type IV pattern of attributability as serendipity was not involved in their discovery and development. However, the development of mianserin is another example of serendipitous influence. As part of a research program carried out by Organon International, B.V. in Oss (The Netherlands), mianserin (a tetracyclic piperazino-azepine) was synthesized in 1966 by van der Burg et al[78], with the aim of confirming whether the antihistamine properties of phenbenzamine and the anti-serotonergic activity of cyproheptadine could be combined in a chemical structure that could be potentially useful for treating asthma, migraine or allergic diseases such as hay fever. Early pharmacological studies confirmed that mianserin was capable of antagonizing the effects of serotonin in different samples of various animal tissues[79], including human blood vessels, and exhibited antihistamine properties[80]. These findings led to the launch of a pilot study in 1969, which was not published, in which the tetracyclic compound was administered to 10 asthmatic patients compared to an untreated control group. Patients who received mianserin had significantly fewer night- time asthma attacks. However, this line of research was not continued as a number of central adverse effects, mainly sedation, were also described[81]. Nevertheless, another study in Ireland also in 1969, found that mianserin had a marked positive effect in improving mood in some subjects, and they began to call mianserin the “good mood pill.” This observation about the hypothetical antidepressant properties of mianserin spurred on the clinical development of the molecule[81]. A number of experi- mental studies carried out using computer analyses of electroencephalogram recordings and comparative pilot trials with amitriptyline confirmed the antidepressant efficacy of this drug[82], which was presented as the first representative of a new generation of antidepressants (heterocyclic antide- pressant compounds). Clinical trials over the next few years revealed antidepressant efficacy similar to that of classical TCAs, but superior to that of other “second generation” agents such as nomifensine or trazodone[81]. As in the case of the two group-leading agents of TCAs and MAOIs, mianserin falls within the type II pattern under our serendipitous attribution criteria, i.e. an initial serendipitous discovery when looking for an antihistamine drug leading secondarily to a non-serendipitous discovery of an antidepressant agent (Table 2). NOTES FOR DIALOGUE Serendipity is a phenomenon that has been regularly and constantly referred to when analyzing the great discoveries that supported the birth of modern psychopharmacology. But, as previously mentioned, the real role of serendipity in these processes has not been sufficiently well defined, possibly due to differences in opinion among authors given the semantic ambiguity of the term “serendipity” [83], and the degree of importance attributed at any given time to the two elements that make up the concept of serendipity: sagacity and unforeseen accidents. For this reason, our group[13,18] advocates the original meaning of the term, as "the discovery of something unexpected or not intentionally sought, in line with favors only the prepared mind"[35]. In fact, in the field of psychopharmacology, contrary to what has been postulated, pure serendipitous discoveries are rather rare, and most of them are of a mixed nature. Some authors refer to these patterns as “pseudo-serendipity”[84] or discoveries that are “serendipity analogues”[85]. These mixed serendipitous discoveries usually consist of a pattern that starts from an initial serendipitous observation and culminates in an intentionally sought-after discovery. For this reason, some authors and scholars may fall into the interpretative error of ascribing merit to chance or luck alone, seeing the results of research processes as a mere continuation of the initial serendipitous findings rather than as two manifestly different events. The cases presented in this paper on the discovery of the two families of classical antidepressants are proof of this: TCAs and MAOIs. Many other discoveries during the 1950s are included within this type II serendipitous attribution pattern that we have defined (initial serendipitous discoveries, in some cases made in laboratory animals, leading secondarily to non- serendipitous discoveries), such as the discovery of the antipsychotic properties of chlorpromazine and clozapine and the experimental tranquillizing properties of meprobamate and its subsequent anxiolytic effect in clinical trials. However, the clearest example was the discovery of the lethargic effect of lithium salts in guinea pigs and their subsequent antimanic effect in humans. Most authors consider the discovery of the antimanic effects of lithium to be purely serendipitous. However, Cade himself pointed out that the link between his casual observation of the lethargic effect in guinea pigs and the subsequent confirmation of the antimanic efficacy of lithium salts was far from obvious[86]. For more information on the historical development of these drugs, see the work of our group[19,20,23,25,41,87-89]. There are also examples of mixed serendipitous discoveries in reverse, included in our type III pattern (non-serendipitous discoveries partnered secondarily with serendipitous discoveries). The most representative example of this group would have to be barbiturates and their intended hypnotic effects, López-Muñoz F et al. Serendipity and classical antidepressant drugs WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 598 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 which made the later serendipitous discovery of their anticonvulsant and antiepileptic effects possible [90]. But although serendipity does not usually work alone, there are also cases of pure serendipitous discoveries (type I pattern of attributability), such as the discovery of the anticonvulsant and mood stabilizing effects of valproic acid and valproate, respectively, or the discovery of the psychotropic effects of lysergic acid diethylamide. Similarly, other discoveries in the field of psychopharmacology during the golden decade of the 1950s should be included under the type IV pattern, namely non- serendipitous discoveries, in line with our operational definition of an unintended finding. Notable here is the discovery of the anxiolytic effect of chlordiazepoxide, the first benzodiazepine agent[91], and the antipsychotic effect of haloperidol and reserpine[24,92,93]. The clinical introduction of psychotropic drugs during the 1950s can be considered one of the great advances in medicine of the 20th century, and a major part of this breakthrough can be attributed to the discovery of the antidepressant effects of iproniazid and imipramine[3], a process in which serendipity played an essential role. But it is worth highlighting another series of contributions to the progress of biological psychiatry in addition to this great clinical contribution[3]. First, from a strictly pharmaco- logical point of view, the development of imipramine led to the introduction of new methods for assessing the antidepressant activity of different substances[94]. Second, the discovery and subsequent therapeutic use of TCAs and MAOIs played a major role in developing the first etiopathogenic theories on affective disorders[95]. During the 1960s, catecholaminergic theories of depression blossomed, postulating a functional impairment of brain noradrenergic neurotransmission as the primary cause of affective disorders based on observations made on the effects of newly discovered antidepressant drugs, such as the blocking of synaptic reuptake of norepinephrine by imipramine[96]. Later, in 1968, Carlsson et al[97] described for the first time how imipramine was able to block the reuptake of serotonin in brain pathways, thereby laying the groundwork for the “serotonergic hypothesis” of depression. However, the story of these two families of antidepressants evolved in completely different ways. Consequently, while TCAs continue to be used in clinical practice in an important way and constitute first-line tools in clinical research, MAOIs have suffered a large reduction in their use, except in the specific case of atypical depressions, largely due to their problems of interactions with other psychos- timulant drugs and with tyramine-rich foods, which can lead to tragic hypertensive crises. However, despite this divergence, the importance of imipramine and iproniazid in the history of psychopharma- cology is paramount. CONCLUSION It is clear that during the 1950s and 1960s serendipity played an important role in the process of building modern psychopharmacology in general and the first groups of families of antidepressant drugs in particular giving way in later decades to another way of understanding scientific research in this field, namely the systematic and rational planning of projects to be developed. In recent decades, psychopharmacology is moving away from the influence of serendipity towards new scientific approaches, although this is a gradual process[98] as can be seen with the serendipitous introduction of ketamine into the antidepressant arsenal. In any event, the results of this work confirm that serendipity should be understood as more of an eminently scientific construct than a literary curiosity. In the words of the discoverer of vitamin C, Albert Szent-Györgyi, “discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought”[99]. FOOTNOTES Author contributions: All authors have contributed to this work; López-Muñoz F and Álamo C designed the study; López-Muñoz F and Guerra JA analyzed the data; López-Muñoz F, D’Ocón P and Romero A wrote the manuscript; López-Muñoz F approved the final manuscript; all authors reviewed and approved the final draft. Conflict-of-interest statement: Nothing to disclosed. Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY- NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non- commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Country/Territory of origin: Spain ORCID number: Francisco López-Muñoz 0000-0002-5188-6038; Pilar D'Ocón 0000-0001-8544-7124; Alejandro Romero 0000- 0001-5483-4973; José A Guerra 0000-0002-0497-1061; Cecilio Álamo 0000-0001-7652-7931. https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5188-6038 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5188-6038 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8544-7124 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8544-7124 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5483-4973 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5483-4973 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5483-4973 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0497-1061 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0497-1061 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7652-7931 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7652-7931 López-Muñoz F et al. Serendipity and classical antidepressant drugs WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 599 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 S-Editor: Fan JR L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Fan JR REFERENCES Cade JF. Lithium salts in the treatment of psychotic excitement. Med J Aust 1949; 2: 349-352 [PMID: 18142718 DOI: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.1999.06241.x] 1 López-Muñoz F, Álamo C, Cuenca E. La “Década de Oro” de la Psicofarmacología (1950-1960): Trascendencia histórica de la introducción clínica de los psicofármacos clásicos. Psiquiatria.COM 2000. [cited 10 July 2022]. Available from: http://www.psiquiatria.com/psiquiatria/revista/47/1800/?++interactivo 2 López-Muñoz F, Álamo C, Domino E. History of Psychopharmacology, 4 Volumes. Arlington: NPP Books, 20143 López-Muñoz F, Álamo C. History of the discovery of antidepressant drugs. In: López-Muñoz F, Srinivasan V, De Berardis D, Álamo C, Kato TA, editors. Melatonin, Neuroprotective Agents and Antidepressant Therapy. New Delhi: Springer International, 2016: 365-383 4 López-Muñoz F, Álamo C, Cuenca E. Fármacos antidepresivos. In: López-Muñoz F, Álamo C, editors. Historia de la Neuropsicofarmacología. Una nueva aportación a la terapéutica farmacológica de los trastornos del Sistema Nervioso Central. Madrid: Ediciones Eurobook S.L. and Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alcalá, 1998: 269-303 5 Rappa LR, Larose-Pierre M, Branch III E, Iglesias AJ, Norwood DA, Simon WA. Desperately seeking serendipity: The past, present, and future of antidepressant therapy. J Pharm Pract 2001; 14: 560-569. [DOI: 10.1177/089719001129040900] 6 López-Muñoz F, Álamo C, Cuenca E. Historia de la Psicofarmacología. In: Vallejo J, Leal C, directors. Tratado de Psiquiatría, 2ª Edition, Volume II. Barcelona: Ars Medica, 2010: 2031-2061 7 Healy D. The antidepressant era. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 19978 Shorter E. A history of psychiatry. From the era of the asylum to the age of Prozac. New York: Wiley & Sons: 19979 Connolly KR, Thase ME. Emerging drugs for major depressive disorder. Exp Opin Emerg Drugs 2012; 17: 105-126 [DOI: 10.1517/14728214.2012.660146] 10 Baumeister AA, Hawkins MF. El papel de la “serendipity” en la ontogenia de la moderna psicofarmacología. In: López- Muñoz F, Álamo C, editors. Historia de la Psicofarmacología. Madrid: Editorial Médica Panamericana, 2007: 1525-1538 11 Robinson E. Psychopharmacology: From serendipitous discoveries to rationale design, but what next? Brain Neurosci Adv 2018; 2: 2398212818812629 [PMID: 32166162 DOI: 10.1177/2398212818812629] 12 López-Muñoz F, Baumeister AA, Hawkins MF, Álamo C. El papel de la serendipia en el descubrimiento de los efectos clí nicos de los psicofármacos: más allá del mito. Actas Esp Psiquiatr 2012; 40: 34-42 [DOI: 10.18356/525c9b93-es] 13 Cobbledick S. The information-seeking behavior of artists: exploratory interviews. Libr Quart 1996; 66: 343-37214 Delgadillo R, Lynch BP. Future historians; their quest for information. College Res Libr 1999; 60: 245-259 [DOI: 10.5860/crl.60.3.245] 15 Kubinyi H. Chance favors the prepared mind. From serendipity to rational drug design. J Receptor Sign Transduct Res 1999; 19: 15-39 [PMID: 10071748 DOI: 10.3109/10799899909036635] 16 Hargrave-Thomas E, Yu B, Reynisson J. The Effect of serendipity in drug discovery and development. Chem New Zealand 2012; 4: 17-20 17 Baumeister AA, Hawkins MF, López-Muñoz F. Toward standardized usage of the word serendipity in the historiography of psychopharmacology. J Hist Neurosci 2010; 19: 253-270 [PMID: 20628954 DOI: 10.1080/09647040903188205] 18 López-Muñoz F, Assion HJ, Álamo C, García-García P, Fangmann P. La introducción clínica de la iproniazida y la imipramina: medio siglo de terapéutica antidepresiva. An Psiquiatr 2008; 24: 56-70 [DOI: 10.1016/s1134-5934(07)73288-8] 19 Fangmann P, Assion HJ, Juckel G, González CA, López-Muñoz F. Half a century of antidepressant drugs: on the clinical introduction of monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclics, and tetracyclics. Part II: tricyclics and tetracyclics. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2008; 28: 1-4 [PMID: 18204333 DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181627b60] 20 Delay J, Deniker P, Harl JM. Utilisation en thérapeutique d’une phenotiazine d’action centrale selective (4560 RP). Ann Méd Psychol 1952; 110: 112-117 [DOI: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1951.tb13272.x] 21 Kline NS. Use of Rauwolfia serpentina Benth. in neuropsychiatric conditions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1954; 59: 107-132 [PMID: 13198043 DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1954.tb45922.x] 22 López-Muñoz F, Álamo C, Cuenca E. Aspectos históricos del descubrimiento y de la introducción clínica de la clorpromazina: medio siglo de psicofarmacología. Frenia Rev Hist Psiquiatr 2002; 2: 77-107 [DOI: 10.20453/rnp.v60i0.1418] 23 López-Muñoz F, Bhatara VS, Álamo C, Cuenca E. Aproximación histórica al descubrimiento de la reserpina y su introducción en la clínica psiquiátrica. Actas Esp Psiquiatr 2004; 32: 387-395 [DOI: 10.4321/s0210-48062008000200003] 24 López-Muñoz F, Álamo C, Cuenca E, Shen WW, Clervoy P, Rubio G. History of the discovery and clinical introduction of chlorpromazine. Ann Clin Psychiatr 2005; 17: 113-135 [PMID: 16433053 DOI: 10.1080/10401230591002002] 25 Kuhn R. Geschichte der medikamentösen Depressionsbehandlung. In: Linde OK, editor. Pharmakopsychiatrie im Wandel der Zeit. Klingenmünster: Tilia-Verlag, 1988: 10-27 26 Schindler W, Häfliger F. Derivate des Iminodibenzyl. Helv Chim Acta 1954; 37: 427 [DOI: 10.1002/hlca.19540370211]27 Pereira VS, Hiroaki-Sato VA. A brief history of antidepressant drug development: from tricyclics to beyond ketamine. Acta Neuropsychiatr 2018; 30: 307-322 [PMID: 29388517 DOI: 10.1017/neu.2017.39] 28 Filip KB. 40 Jahre Imipramin. Ein Antidepressivum hat die Welt verändert. [cited 10 July 2022]. Available from: 29 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18142718 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.1999.06241.x http://www.psiquiatria.com/psiquiatria/revista/47/1800/?++interactivo https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089719001129040900 https://dx.doi.org/10.1517/14728214.2012.660146 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166162 https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2398212818812629 https://dx.doi.org/10.18356/525c9b93-es https://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.60.3.245 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10071748 https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10799899909036635 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20628954 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09647040903188205 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1134-5934(07)73288-8 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18204333 https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181627b60 https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0954-6820.1951.tb13272.x http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13198043 https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1954.tb45922.x https://dx.doi.org/10.20453/rnp.v60i0.1418 https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/s0210-48062008000200003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16433053 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10401230591002002 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hlca.19540370211 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29388517 https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/neu.2017.39 López-Muñoz F et al. Serendipity and classical antidepressant drugs WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 600 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 http://www.Medizin-2000.de Tansey T. Las instituciones públicas y privadas y el avance de la psicofarmacología. In: López-Muñoz F, Álamo C, editors. Historia de la Psicofarmacología. Madrid: Editorial Médica Panamericana, 2007: 1165-1186 30 Ban TA. Psicofarmacología: El nacimiento de una nueva disciplina. In: López-Muñoz F, Álamo C, editors. Historia de la Psicofarmacología. Madrid: Editorial Médica Panamericana, 2007: 577-597 31 Kuhn R. [Treatment of depressive states with an iminodibenzyl derivative (G 22355)]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1957; 87: 1135-1140 [PMID: 13467194] 32 Kuhn R. The treatment of depressive states with G 22355 (imipramine hydrochloride). Am J Psychiatry 1958; 115: 459- 464 [PMID: 13583250 DOI: 10.1176/ajp.115.5.459] 33 Kuhn R. The imipramine story. In: Ayd FJ, Blackwell B, editors. Discoveries in Biological Psychiatry. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company, 1970: 205-217 34 Hofmann A. LSD My Problem Child. Reflections on Sacred Drugs, Mysticism, and Science. Nueva York: McGraw Hill, 1980 35 Paioni R. Chemie der Antidepressiva. In: Langer G, Heimann H, editors. Psychopharmaka, Grundlagen und Therapie. Viena and New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983: 59-65 36 Lassen N. Die Geschichte der Thioxanthene. In: Linde OK, editor. Pharmakopsychiatrie im Wandel der Zeit. Klingenmünster: Tilia-Verlag, 1988: 170-183 37 Lebowitz BD, Harris HW. Drug discovery and mental illness. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2002; 4: 325-328 [PMID: 22033799] 38 Singh H, Becker PM. Novel therapeutic usage of low-dose doxepin hydrochloride. Exp Opin Invest Drugs 2007; 16: 1295- 1305 [PMID: 17685877 DOI: 10.1517/13543784.16.8.1295] 39 Pöldinger W. Die Geschichte des Doxepin. In: Linde OK, editor. Pharmakopsychiatrie im Wandel der Zeit. Klingenmünster: Tilia-Verlag, 1988: 266-270 40 López-Muñoz F, Alamo C. Monoaminergic neurotransmission: the history of the discovery of antidepressants from 1950s until today. Curr Pharm Des 2009; 15: 1563-1586 [PMID: 19442174 DOI: 10.2174/138161209788168001] 41 Selikoff IJ, Robitzek EH, Ornstein GG. Treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis with hydrazine derivatives of isonicotinic acid. JAMA 1952; 150: 973-980 [DOI: 10.1001/jama.1952.03680100015006] 42 Sandler M. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors in depression: history and mythology. J Psychopharmacol 1990; 4: 136-139 [PMID: 22282941 DOI: 10.1177/026988119000400307] 43 Pletscher A. Iproniazid: prototype of antidepressant MAO-Inhibitors. In: Ban TA, Healy D, Shorter E, editors. Reflections on twentieth-century psychopharmacology. Budapest: Animula Publishing House, 2004: 174-177 44 Bosworth DM, Fielding JW, Demarest L, Bonaquist M. Toxicity to iproniazid (Marsilid) as it affects osseous tuberculosis. Quart Bull Sea View Hosp 1955; 16: 134-140 [PMID: 14385846] 45 Smith JA. The use of the isopropyl derivative of isonicotinylhydrazine (marsilid) in the treatment of mental disease; a preliminary report. Am Pract Dig Treat 1953; 4: 519-520 [PMID: 13080562] 46 Kamman GR, Freeman JG, Lucero RJ. The effect of 1-isonicotinyl-2-isopropyl hidrazide (IIH) on the behaviour of long- term mental patients. J Nerv Ment Dis 1953; 118: 391-407 [PMID: 13131066 DOI: 10.1097/00005053-195311000-00002] 47 Castilla del Pino C. Síndrome hiperesténico. Alteraciones de la personalidad consecutivas a la terapéutica hidrazídica. Actas Luso-Esp Neurol Psiquiat 1955; 14: 210-219 48 Delay J, Laine B, Buisson JF. Anxiety and depressive states treated with isonicotinyl hydrazide (isoniazid). Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1952; 70: 317-324 49 Delay J, Lainé B, Buisson JF. Note concernant l’action de l’isonicotinyl-hydrazide utiliseé dans le traitement des états dé pressifs. Ann Méd-Psych 1952; 2: 689-692 [DOI: 10.4414/saez.2000.07607] 50 Salzer HM, Lurie ML. Anxiety and depressive states treated with isonicotinyl hydrazid (isoniazid). Arch Neurol Psychiat 1953; 70: 317-324 [PMID: 13079356 DOI: 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1953.02320330042005] 51 Healy D. The three faces of the antidepressants: a critical commentary on the clinical-economic context of diagnosis. J Nerv Ment Dis 1999; 187: 174-180 [PMID: 10086474 DOI: 10.1097/00005053-199903000-00007] 52 Crane G. Iproniazid (Marsilid) phosphate, a therapeutic agent for mental disorders and debilitating diseases. Psychiat Res Rep 1957; 8: 142-152 [PMID: 13542682] 53 Ayd FJ Jr. A preliminary report on marsilid. Am J Psychiatry 1957; 114: 459 [PMID: 13470120 DOI: 10.1176/ajp.114.5.459] 54 Chessin M, Dubnick B, Kramer ER, Scott CC. Modifications of pharmacology of reserpine and serotonin by iproniazid. Fed Proc 1956; 15: 409 [DOI: 10.1007/bf00628635] 55 Loomer HP, Saunders IC, Kline NS. A clinical and pharmacodynamic evaluation of iproniazid as a psychic energizer. Psychiat Res Rep Am Psychiat Assoc 1958; 8: 129-141 [PMID: 13542681] 56 Kline NS. Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors: an unfinished picaresque tale. En: Ayd FJ, Blackwell B, editors. Discoveries in Biological Psychiatry. Baltimore: Ayd Medical Communications, 1984: 194-204 57 Loomer HP, Saunders IC, Kline NS. Iproniazid, an amine oxidase inhibitor, as an example of a psychic energizer. Congress Rec 1957; 5: 1382-1390 [DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1959.tb49243.x] 58 Sneader W. Drug discovery: the evolution of modern medicines. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons: 198559 Zeller EA, Barsky J, Fouts JR, Kirchheimer WF, Van Orden LS. Influence of isonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH) and 1- isonicotinic-2-isopropyl-hydrazide (IIH) on bacterial and mammalian enzymes. Experientia 1952; 8: 349 [DOI: 10.1007/bf02174413] 60 Jacobsen E. The early history of psychotherapeutic drugs. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1986; 89: 138-144 [PMID: 2873606 DOI: 10.1007/BF00310617] 61 Robinson DS, Nies A, Ravaris CL, Lamborn KR. The monoamine oxidase inhibitor, phenelzine, in the treatment of depressive-anxiety states. A controlled clinical trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1973; 29: 407-413 [PMID: 4579506 DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1973.04200030093015] 62 http://www.Medizin-2000.de http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13467194 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13583250 https://dx.doi.org/10.1176/ajp.115.5.459 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22033799 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17685877 https://dx.doi.org/10.1517/13543784.16.8.1295 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19442174 https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138161209788168001 https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1952.03680100015006 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22282941 https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026988119000400307 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14385846 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13080562 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13131066 https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005053-195311000-00002 https://dx.doi.org/10.4414/saez.2000.07607 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13079356 https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneurpsyc.1953.02320330042005 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10086474 https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199903000-00007 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13542682 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13470120 https://dx.doi.org/10.1176/ajp.114.5.459 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00628635 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13542681 https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1959.tb49243.x https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02174413 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2873606 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00310617 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4579506 https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1973.04200030093015 López-Muñoz F et al. Serendipity and classical antidepressant drugs WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 601 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 Maass AR, Nimmo MJ. A new inhibitor of serotonin metabolism. Nature 1959; 184(Suppl 8): 547-548 [PMID: 14419236 DOI: 10.1038/184547b0] 63 Freyhan FA. The modern treatment of depressive disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1960; 116: 1057-1064 [PMID: 13824958 DOI: 10.1176/ajp.116.12.1057] 64 Ban TA. Pharmacotherapy of depression: a historical analysis. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2001; 108: 707-716 [PMID: 11478422 DOI: 10.1007/s007020170047] 65 Entzeroth M, Ratty AK. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Revisiting a therapeutic principle. Open J Depress 2017; 6: 31-6866 Burger A, Yost WL. Arylcycloalkylamines. I. 2-phenylcyclopropylamine. J Am Chem Soc 1948; 70: 2198-2201 [DOI: 10.1021/ja01186a062] 67 Tedeschi RE, Tedeschi DH, Ames PL, Cook L, Mattis PA, Fellows EJ. Some neuropharmacological observations on tranylcypromine (SKF trans-385), a potent inhibitor of monoamine oxidase. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1959; 102: 380-381 [PMID: 13837261 DOI: 10.3181/00379727-102-25256] 68 Atkinson RM, Ditman KS. Tranylcypromine: a review. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1965; 6: 631-655 [PMID: 5320592 DOI: 10.1002/cpt196565631] 69 Blackwell B. Hypertensive crisis due to monoamine-oxidase inhibitors. Lancet 1963; 2: 849-850 [PMID: 14056007 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(63)92743-0] 70 Blackwell B. The process of discovery. In: Ayd FJ, Blackwell B, editors. Discoveries in Biological Psychiatry. Baltimore: Ayd Medical Communications, 1984: 11-29 71 Alvano SA, Zieher LM. An updated classification of antidepressants: A proposal to simplify treatment. Personal Med Psychiatr 2020; 19-20: 100042 72 Ramachandraih CT, Subramanyam N, Bar KJ, Baker G, Yeragani VK. Antidepressants: From MAOIs to SSRIs and more. Indian J Psychiatr 2011; 53: 180-182 [PMID: 21772661 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.82567] 73 Brogden RN, Heel RC, Speight TM, Avery GS. Nomifensine: A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in depressive illness. Drugs 1979; 18: 1-24 [PMID: 477572 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-197918010-00001] 74 Stahl SM. Mechanism of action of trazodone: a multifunctional drug. CNS Spectr 2009; 14: 536-546 [PMID: 20095366 DOI: 10.1017/s1092852900024020] 75 Gorecki DK, Verbeeck RK. Trazodone Hydrochloride. In: Forey K, editor. Profiles of Drug Substances, Excipients and Related Methodology, Vol. 16. Cambridge: Academic Press, 1987: 695 76 Silvestrini B. Trazodone: from the mental pain to the “dys-stress” hypothesis of depression. Clin Neuropharmacol 1989; 12 (Suppl 1): S4-10 [PMID: 2568177 DOI: 10.1097/00002826-198901001-00002] 77 Van der Burg WJ, Bonta IL, Delobelle J, Ramon C, Vargaftig B. Novel type of substituted piperazine with high antiserotonin potency. J Med Chem 1970; 13: 35-39 [PMID: 5412112 DOI: 10.1021/jm00295a010] 78 Vargaftig BB, Coignet JL, de Vos CJ, Grijsen H, Bonta IL. Mianserin hydrochloride: peripheral and central effects in relation to antagonism against 5-hydroxytryptamine and tryptamine. Eur J Pharmacol 1971; 16: 336-346 [PMID: 5132561 DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(71)90036-7] 79 Saxena PR, van Houwelingen P, Bonta IL. The effects of mianserin hydrochloride on the vascular responses evoked by 5- hydroxytryptamine and related vasoactive substances. Eur J Pharmacol 1971; 13: 295-305 [PMID: 4397032 DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(71)90218-4] 80 De Ridder JJ. Mianserin: result of a decade of antidepressant research. Pharm Weekbl Sci Edition 1982; 4: 139-145 [PMID: 6128715 DOI: 10.1007/bf01959033] 81 Itil TM, Polvan N, Hsu W. Clinical and EEG effects of GB-94, a “tetracyclic” antidepressant (EEG model in discovery of a new psychotropic drug). Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 1972; 14: 395-413 [PMID: 4625520] 82 Merton RK, Barber E. The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 200483 Roberts RM. Accidental discoveries in Science. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 198984 Diaz de Chumaceiro CL, Yaber OGE Serendipity analogues: approval of modifications of the traditional case study for a psychotherapy research with music. Arts Psychother 1995; 22: 155-159 [DOI: 10.1016/0197-4556(95)00015-w] 85 Cade JF. The story of lithium. En: Ayd FJ, Blackwell B, editors. Discoveries in Biological Psychiatry. Philadelphia: Lippincott Company, 1970: 218-229 86 López-Muñoz F, Álamo C, Cuenca E. Cincuenta años de Psicofarmacología: John Cade y las sales de litio. Psiquiatr Biol 1999; 6: 229-230 [DOI: 10.33426/rcg/2018/103/104] 87 López-Muñoz F, Ramchandani D, Álamo C, Cuenca E. Aproximación histórica al descubrimiento del meprobamato y su introducción en psiquiatría: medio siglo de terapéutica ansiolítica. Arch Psiquiatr 2005; 68: 103-122 [DOI: 10.1016/s1134-5934(06)75359-3] 88 López-Muñoz F, Alamo C, Juckel G, Assion HJ. Half a century of antidepressant drugs: on the clinical introduction of monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclics, and tetracyclics. Part I: monoamine oxidase inhibitors. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2007; 27: 555-559 [PMID: 18004120 DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181bb617] 89 López-Muñoz F, Ucha-Udabe R, Alamo C. The history of barbiturates a century after their clinical introduction. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2005; 1: 329-343 [PMID: 18568113] 90 López-Muñoz F, Álamo C, García-García P. The discovery of chlordiazepoxide and the clinical introduction of benzodiazepines: Half a century of anxiolytic drugs. J Anxiety Dis 2011; 25: 554-562 [PMID: 21315551 DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.01.002] 91 Bhatara VS, López-Muñoz F, Álamo C. El papel de la medicina herbal ayurvédica en el descubrimiento de las propiedades neurolépticas de la reserpina: a propósito de la Rauwolfia serpentina y los orígenes de la era antipsicótica. An Psiquiatr 2004; 20: 274-281 [DOI: 10.4995/thesis/10251/7202] 92 López-Muñoz F, Alamo C. The consolidation of neuroleptic therapy: Janssen, the discovery of haloperidol and its introduction into clinical practice. Brain Res Bull 2009; 79: 130-141 [PMID: 19186209 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.01.005] 93 Costa E, Garattini S, Valzelli S. Interactions between reserpine, chlorpromazine, and imipramine. Experientia 1960; 16: 94 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14419236 https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/184547b0 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13824958 https://dx.doi.org/10.1176/ajp.116.12.1057 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11478422 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007020170047 https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja01186a062 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13837261 https://dx.doi.org/10.3181/00379727-102-25256 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5320592 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt196565631 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14056007 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(63)92743-0 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21772661 https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.82567 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/477572 https://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00003495-197918010-00001 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20095366 https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1092852900024020 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2568177 https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002826-198901001-00002 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5412112 https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm00295a010 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5132561 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(71)90036-7 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4397032 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(71)90218-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6128715 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01959033 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4625520 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0197-4556(95)00015-w https://dx.doi.org/10.33426/rcg/2018/103/104 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1134-5934(06)75359-3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18004120 https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181bb617 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18568113 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21315551 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.01.002 https://dx.doi.org/10.4995/thesis/10251/7202 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19186209 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.01.005 López-Muñoz F et al. Serendipity and classical antidepressant drugs WJP https://www.wjgnet.com 602 April 19, 2022 Volume 12 Issue 4 461-463 [DOI: 10.1007/bf02171155] Coppen A. The biochemistry of affective disorders. Br J Psychiatry 1967; 113: 1237-1264 [PMID: 4169954 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.113.504.1237] 95 Glowinski J, Axelrod J. Inhibition of uptake of tritiated-noradrenaline in the intact rat brain by imipramine and structurally related compounds. Nature 1964; 204: 1318-1319 [PMID: 14254430 DOI: 10.1038/2041318a0] 96 Carlsson A, Fuxe K, Ungerstedt U. The effect of imipramine on central 5-hydroxytryptamine neurons. J Pharm Pharmacol 1968; 20: 150-151 [PMID: 4384540 DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1968.tb09706.x] 97 Pieper AA, Baraban JM. Moving Beyond Serendipity to Mechanism-Driven Psychiatric Therapeutics. Neurotherapeutics 2017; 14: 533-536 [PMID: 28653277 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-017-0547-6] 98 Good IJ. The Scientist Speculates: An Anthology of Partly-Baked Ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 196399 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02171155 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4169954 https://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.113.504.1237 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14254430 https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/2041318a0 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4384540 https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1968.tb09706.x http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28653277 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0547-6 Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA Telephone: +1-925-3991568 E-mail: bpgoffice@wjgnet.com Help Desk: https://www.f6publishing.com/helpdesk https://www.wjgnet.com © 2022 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. mailto:bpgoffice@wjgnet.com https://www.f6publishing.com/helpdesk https://www.wjgnet.com