RT Journal Article
T1 Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Phase-difference operator’ ’’
A1 Luis Aina, Alfredo
A1 Sánchez Soto, Luis Lorenzo
AB In response to the objection raised by Pegg and Vaccaro [the preceding Comment] we point out that their example is not a difhculty in directly representing the phase difference by the φ12  operator. In fact, we argue that it is a property common to a wide range of phase descriptions, including the Pegg-Barnett formalism.
PB American Physical Society
SN 1050-2947
YR 1995
FD 1995-01
LK https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/59839
UL https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/59839
LA eng
NO © 1995 The American Physical Society.
DS Docta Complutense
RD 6 abr 2025