RT Journal Article
T1 Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Phase-difference operator’ ’’
A1 Luis Aina, Alfredo
A1 Sánchez Soto, Luis Lorenzo
AB In response to the objection raised by Pegg and Vaccaro [the preceding Comment] we point out that their example is not a difhculty in directly representing the phase difference by the φ12  operator. In fact, we argue that it is a property common to a wide range of phase descriptions, including the Pegg-Barnett formalism.
PB American Physical Society
SN 1050-2947
YR 1995
FD 1995-01
LK https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/59839
UL https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/59839
LA eng
NO [1] D. T. Pegg and 3. A. Vaccaro, preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. A 51, 859 (1995).[2] A. Luis and L. L. Sanchez-Soto, Phys. Rev. A 48, 4702 (1993).[3] D. T. Pegg and. S. M. Barnett, Europhys. Lett. 6, 483 (1988); S. M. Barnett and D. T. Pegg, J. Mod. Opt. 36, 7 (1989).[4] J. M. Levy-Leblond, Rev'. Mex. Fis. 22, 15 (1973); Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 101, 319 (1976); T. S. Santhanam, Found. Phys. 7, 121 (1977); S. M. Barnett and D. T. Pegg, Phys. Rev. A 41, 3427 (1990); L. L. Sanchez-Soto and A. Luis, Opt. Commun. 105, 84 (1994). [5] P. Carruthers and M. M. Nieto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 40, 441 (1968).[6] S. M. Barnett and D. T. Pegg, Phys. Rev. A 42, 6713 (1990).[7] A. Luis, L. L. Sanchez-Soto, and R. Tanas, Phys. Rev. A (to be published).[8] J. W. Noh, A. Fougeres, and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1426 (1991);Phys. Rev. A 45, 424 (1992).[9] U. Leonhardt and H. Paul, Phys. Rev. A 47, R2460 (1993).[10] W. Schleich, R. J. Horowicz, and S. Varro, Phys. Rev. A 40, 7405 (1989).
NO © 1995 The American Physical Society.
DS Docta Complutense
RD 3 may 2024