RT Journal Article
T1 Permissivism and the debate about universals
A1 Cumpa Arteseros, Javier
A1 Rossi, Carlo
AB Permissivism is a view about ontological questions which holds that such questions for the most part can all be trivially answered. Understood in this way, Permissivism seems to be entailed, or at least motivate, an important number of ontological and metaontological views, ranging from Mereological Universalism and Material Plenitude to ontologies which draw prominently on some notion of fundamentality, and Deflationism. By and large, permissivist-inspired arguments have had as their ontological target material objects, but little to none is found within the ontological debate about properties. Our aim in this paper is to address this omission by providing a thorough assessment of one notable effort in this direction succinctly formulated by Jonathan Schaffer (2009a, 2009b), which defends the existence of universal properties by way of trivial inferences. We argue that such inferences fail to secure the existence of universal properties in a trivial manner. Together with offering an extended discussion of Schaffer’s permissivist inferences, we also explore alternative ways in which the said inferences can be amended, although in each case with a restricted scope.
PB Taylor and Francis
SN 0020-174X
YR 2025
FD 2025
LK https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/128905
UL https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/128905
LA eng
NO Cumpa, J., & Rossi, C. (2025). Permissivism and the debate about universals. Inquiry, 1–15.
NO Este trabajo ha recibido el apoyo del Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación y la Unión Europea bajo la subvención RYC2021-032478-I y de la Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo de Chile (ANID) bajo el Fondo Fondecyt de Iniciación nº11221341.
NO Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)
NO Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (España)
NO European Commission
NO Agencia Nacional de Inviestigación y Desarrollo de Chile (ANID)
DS Docta Complutense
RD 18 mar 2026