RT Conference Proceedings
T1 An awareness epistemic framework for belief, argumentation and their dynamics
T2 Un marco epistémico de concientización para las creencias, la argumentación y sus dinámicas
A1 Burrieza, Alfredo
A1 Yuste-Ginel, Antonio
AB The notion of argumentation and the one of belief stand in a problematic relation to one another. On the one hand, argumentation is crucial for belief formation: as the outcome of a process of arguing, an agent might come to (justifiably) believe that something is the case. On the other hand, beliefs are an input for argument evaluation: arguments with believed premisses are to be considered as strictly stronger by the agent to arguments whose premisses are not believed. An awareness epistemic logic that captures qualified versions of both principles was recently proposed in the literature. This paper extends that logic in three different directions. First, we try to improve its conceptual grounds, by depicting its philosophical foundations, critically discussing some of its design choices and exploring further possibilities. Second, we provide a (heretofore missing) completeness theorem for the basic fragment of the logic. Third, we study, using techniques from dynamic epistemic logic, how different forms of information change can be captured in the framework.
SN 2075-2180
YR 2021
FD 2021-06-22
LK https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/97887
UL https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/97887
LA eng
NO “An Awareness Epistemic Framework for Belief, Argumentation and Their Dynamics”. XVIII Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK 21), Beijing (online), 25/6/2021.
DS Docta Complutense
RD 11 abr 2025