%0 Journal Article
%A Mateo Sierra, Olga
%A Alcalá Torres, Juan
%A Serret de Troya, Carlos
%A Valera Melé, Marc
%A Sola Vendrell, Emma
%T Análisis del impacto clínico de la reclasificación diagnóstica de gliomas cerebrales según la clasificación de la organización mundial de la salud (2016)
%D 2019
%U https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/128201
%X Introduction: Since the introduction of genetic and molecular criteria in the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of brain tumours, there has been a diagnostic reclassification between certain astrocytomas and oligodendro-gliomas with histological and genetic discordances, the prognosis of which is unknown.Aim: To analyse the implications of the diagnostic reclassification of brain gliomas according to the 2016 WHO criteria, especially depending on isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p19q codeletion.Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of gliomas treated from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2016, with analyses of clinicoradiological aspects and prognoses, and with available and complete follow-up until 31 March 2019.Results: From a total of 147 brain gliomas, a molecular diagnosis and a diagnostic re-evaluation were carried out in 69 cases (grade II-IV astrocytomas or oligodendrogliomas). Twenty-four reclassified gliomas were detected, usually oligodendro-gliomas that became astrocytomas, and which showed greater survival, derived from their not being classified as grade IV. The reclassified gliomas, all grades II/III, mostly began with seizures, without focus, with single lesions, < 17 cm3 and with oedema, although with similar survival rates. The prognostic factors were: young age, focus, grade II and no contrast enhancement or necrosis, or multiplicity. No variations were detected according to the molecular pattern with IDH mutation or codeletion.Conclusion: The changes in diagnosis after the WHO classification of 2016 present specific clinical-radiological characteristics in this series, but no greater survival, although, due to the habitual survival in these cases, they would require a longer follow-up time.
%~