RT Journal Article
T1 Visual and optical quality of enhanced intermediate monofocal versus standard monofocal intraocular lens
A1 Albarrán Diego, Cesar Antonio
A1 Garzón Jiménez, Nuria
A1 Poyales Galán, Francisco
A1 Rico del Viejo, Laura
A1 Pérez Sanz, Lidia María
A1 García Montero, María
AB Purpose: Intraocular lens designs are constantly evolving, trying to obtain  more spectacle independence after cataract surgery. This advantage can be  linked to some disadvantages, such as optical quality decrease. For that  reason, it is important to assess, not only the amount of vision provided but  also the quality of vision once they are implanted. The purpose of the present  work was to compare the visual performance between two monofocal intraocular  models: a standard model and a monofocal with enhanced intermediate vision  lens.Methods: Prospective, randomized, comparative study. Sixty adult subjects  scheduled to undergo bilateral cataract surgery and IOL implantation were  randomized to receive one of the two IOLs in both eyes at Miranza IOA, Madrid,  Spain (group A: monofocal with enhanced intermediate vision lens and group B:  standard monofocal lens). Monocular outcomes (right eyes) determined 1 and 3  months postoperatively were photopic corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA),  uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), perceived halo, corrected  intermediate-distance contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations. The impact of the new IOL in the postoperative management with autorefraction  devices was also evaluated. Results: No differences were found in CDVA between the two groups. Significant  differences were detected between the two lenses evaluated in both total HOA  (p = 0.028) and internal HOA (p = 0.037). Contrast sensitivity and halometry  results obtained at 1 month were similar across the two IOL groups. Conclusion: In patients undergoing cataract surgery, monofocal with enhanced  intermediate vision IOL offered similar distance performance and contrast  sensitivity along with perceived HOA and halos compared with the standard monofocal IOLs tested.
PB Springer Nature
SN 0721-832X; 1435-702X (e)
YR 2022
FD 2022-05-17
LK https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/71502
UL https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/71502
LA eng
NO Received 13 Dec 2021; Revised 24 Apr 2022; Accepted 17 May 2022
NO Johnson & Johnson Vision
DS Docta Complutense
RD 1 ago 2024