RT Journal Article
T1 Microtensile bond strength test bias caused by variations in bonded areas
A1 Macorra García, José Carlos De La
A1 Pérez-Higueras Sánchez-Escalonilla, Juan
AB Purpose: While it has been shown that no method produces specimens with exactly the same cross-sectional bonded area (BA), BA variations within and between studies are a well-known covariate in microtensile test results. However, no method has yet been described to accurately acount for its influence. A procedure is presented that allows controlling for variations of BA effects on results. Further, a proposal for reporting is presented which enables resuls of different studies to be compared.Materials and methods: partially using the results of the report in which the microtensile test was originally described, both general (caused by differences in BA) and specific (due to a material's performance differences and intrinsic biological varibility of specimens) variabilities were separated through linear regression of microtensile (MPa) to BA(mm2) pooled results. Comparing the specific variability of specimens-the residuals to the regression line-of groups allowed assessing differences between groups.Results: A means comparison of residuals showed that specific differences were significant (t-test, p=0.0004). The null hypothesis could be rejected : materials' performances were different. This could not be determined in the original report, since BA variability was very high. A proposal for reporting of results to facilitate their clinical interpretation and comparison between studies is presented.Conclusion:Controlling for general variability caused by differences in BA size allows precise comparison of microtensile tests results.
PB Quintessence
SN 1461-5185
YR 2014
FD 2014
LK https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/34020
UL https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/34020
LA spa
NO Microtensile Bond Strength Test Bias Caused by Variations in Bonded Areas. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2014;16:207–219.
DS Docta Complutense
RD 18 abr 2025