RT Journal Article
T1 Stability and visual outcomes yielded by three intraocular trifocal lenses with same optical zone design but differing material or toricity
A1 Poyales Galán, Francisco
A1 Garzón Jiménez, Nuria
A1 Pizarro, Daniel
A1 Cobreces, Santiago
A1 Hernández, Adolfo
AB Purpose: To compare rotational stability, centration and visual outcomes provided by three trifocal lens models that have the same optical zone design but different material, composition, and/or toricity. Methods: The study included 78 patients with symmetric bilateral intraocular lens implantation. The lenses  under evaluation were trifocal intraocular lenses made of hydrophilic acrylic material: a spherical lens  26% hydrophilic acrylic (POD FineVision), a similar lens but having a toric design (POD Toric FineVision),  and a trifocal lens 25% hydrophilic acrylic material (FineVision/MicroF). Moreover, the lenses share the  same optical zone design. The lenses’ rotational stability and centration were measured by means of the  PIOLET software, which relies on recording and image processing techniques to determine lens rotation and  centration based on slit-lamp images. We also assessed patients’ visual quality by means of 25, 40, and 80  cm VA tests.Results: The best centration results were achieved with the POD Toric FineVision model, although the  differences were not statistically significant. As for lens rotation, it was below 5° in all cases under  study. Regarding VA, all subjects attained at least 0.3 logMAR for far distance uncorrected VA, at 80 cm  VA was about 0.2 logMAR, at 40 cm it was above 0.15 logMAR, and at 25 cm it was about 0.3 logMAR for both  lens types.Conclusion: All three intraocular lens models yield excellent visual results at far, near as well as  intermediate distances. The POD FineVision and POD Toric FineVision models, with double C-loop design,  yielded the best results centrationwise and rotation-wise. Differences had no clinical relevance.
PB Sage
SN 1120-6721
YR 2018
FD 2018-09-10
LK https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/12226
UL https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/12226
LA eng
NO Article first published online: September 10, 2018 Received: March 20, 2018; Accepted: July 27, 2018
DS Docta Complutense
RD 10 oct 2024