RT Journal Article
T1 Nonclassical light revealed by the joint statistics of simultaneous measurements
A1 Luis Aina, Alfredo
AB Nonclassicality cannot be a single-observable property, since the statistics of any quantum observable is compatible with classical physics. We develop a general procedure to reveal nonclassical behavior of light states from the joint statistics arising in the practical measurement of multiple observables. Beside embracing previous approaches, this protocol can disclose nonclassical features for standard examples of classical-like behavior, such as SU(2) and Glauber coherent states. When combined with other criteria, this would imply that every light state is nonclassical.
PB Optical Society of America
SN 0146-9592
YR 2016
FD 2016-04-15
LK https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/24515
UL https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/24515
LA eng
NO 1.	J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964). 2.	J. S. Bell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966). 3.	J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne, Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974). 4.	A. Fine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 291 (1982). 5.	I. Pitowsky, British J. Philos. Sci. 45, 95 (1994). 6.	T. Durt, Foundations Phys. 27, 415 (1997). 7.	A. Rivas, “Incompatible statistics and Bell-KS theorem,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.04929 . 8.	W. M. Muynck, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist Approach (Kluwer, 2002).9.	W. M. de Muynck and H. Martens, Phys. Rev. A 42, 5079 (1990). 10.	W. M. de Muynck, Phys. Lett. A 182, 201 (1993). 11.	W. M. de Muynck, J. Phys. A 31, 431 (1998). 12.	H. S. Karthik, H. Katiyar, A. Shukla, T. S. Mahesh, A. R. Usha Devi, and A. K. Rajagopal, Phys. Rev. A 87, 052118 (2013). 13.	L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University, 1995). 14.	M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University, 1997). 15.	D.-G. Welsch, W. Vogel, and T. Opatrný, Progress in Optics, E. Wolf, ed. (Elsevier, 1999), Vol. 39, pp. 63–211. 16.	A. Luis, Phys. Rev. A 84, 034101 (2011). 17.	A. Luis, “Contradictory entropic joint uncertainty relations for complementary observables in two-level systems,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.5211 . 18.	A. Luis, G. M. Bosyk, and M. Portesi, Phys. A 444, 905 (2016). 19.	A. Luis, “Nonclassical states from the joint statistics of simultaneous measurements,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.07680 . 20.	F. T. Arecchi, E. Courtens, R. Gilmore, and H. Thomas, Phys. Rev. A 6, 2211 (1972). 21.	O. Giraud, P. Braun, and D. Braun, Phys. Rev. A 78, 042112 (2008). 22.	O. Giraud, P. Braun, and D. Braun, New J. Phys. 12, 063005 (2010). 23.	D. Arsenović, N. Burić, and D. M. Davidović, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1797 (1999). 24.	A. Luis, Phys. Rev. A 73, 063806 (2006). 25.	M. V. Chokhova and F. Y. Khalili, Phys. Rev. A 88, 023822 (2013). 26.	P. Carruthers and M. M. Nieto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 40, 411 (1968). 27.	S. M. Barnett and D. T. Pegg, J. Phys. A 19, 3849 (1986). 28.	R. Lynch, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 1723 (1987). 29.	J. W. Noh, A. Fougères, and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1426 (1991). 30.	J. W. Noh, A. Fougères, and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. A 45, 424 (1992). 31.	J. W. Noh, A. Fougères, and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. A 46, 2840 (1992). 32.	A. S. Shumovsky, Opt. Commun. 136, 219 (1997). 33.	A. Cives-Esclop, A. Luis, and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, Opt. Commun. 175, 153 (2000). 34.	M. Grabowski, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 28, 1215 (1989). 35.	M. Grabowski, Rep. Math. Phys. 29, 377 (1991). 36.	J. Bergou and B.-G. Englert, Ann. Phys. 209, 479 (1991). 37.	R. Lynch, Phys. Rep. 256, 367 (1995). 38.	V. Peřinová, A. Lukš, and J. Peřina, Phase in Optics (World Scientific, 1998). 39.	A. Luis and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, Progress in Optics, E. Wolf, ed. (Elsevier, 2000), Vol. 41, pp. 421–482. 40.	A. Luis and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, Phys. Rev. A 48, 4702 (1993). 41.	J. Vaccaro, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3474 (1995). 42.	T. Kiss, U. Herzog, and U. Leonhardt, Phys. Rev. A 52, 2433 (1995). 43.	K. Vogel and H. Risken, Phys. Rev. A 40, 2847 (1989). 44.	A. I. Lvovsky, H. Hansen, T. Aichele, O. Benson, J. Mlynek, and S. Schiller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 050402 (2001). 45.	N. G. Walker, J. Mod. Opt. 34, 15 (1987). 46.	O. Jedrkiewicz, R. Loudon, and J. Jeffers, Eur. Phys. J. D 39, 129 (2006). 47.	A. G. Zajonc, Am. J. Phys. 44, 327 (1976). 48.	A. Rivas and A. Luis, Phys. Rev. A 79, 042105 (2009). 49.	A. Luis and A. Rivas, Phys. Scr. T143, 014015 (2011). 50.	W. Vogel and J. Sperling, Phys. Rev. A 89, 052302 (2014). 51.	C. T. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 44, R2775 (1991). 52.	N. Lükenhaus and S. M. Barnett, Phys. Rev. A 51, 3340 (1995). 53.	A. F. de Lima and B. Baseia, Phys. Rev. A 54, 4589 (1996). 54.	J. Janszky, M. G. Kim, and M. S. Kim, Phys. Rev. A 53, 502 (1996). 55.	C. T. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3374 (1995).
NO © 2016 Optical Society of America.Funding. Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO) (FIS2012-35583); Comunidad de Madrid (QUITEMAD+S2013/ICE-2801).
NO Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO), España
NO Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (CAM)
NO Información y Tecnología Cuánticas en la Comunidad de Madrid (QUITEMAD+), CAM
DS Docta Complutense
RD 29 abr 2024