RT Journal Article
T1 Development and validation of a gra1–bag1 RT-qPCR assay as an alternative to the mouse bioassay for assessing Toxoplasma gondii viability
A1 Largo-de la Torre, Andrea
A1 Velasco Jiménez, Natalia
A1 Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel
A1 Regidor-Cerrillo, Javier
AB Toxoplasmosis is a major foodborne zoonosis causing high global disease burden and economic losses in sheep and goat industries. The gold standard for detecting viable Toxoplasma gondii is the mouse bioassay, which involves inoculating tissues from infected animals into laboratory mice. Here, we describe a faster, cost-effective, and ethical alternative method to assess T. gondii presence and viability. The procedure is based on reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) targeting messenger RNA transcripts of genes highly expressed during infection, including the bradyzoite-specific gene bag1, indicative of chronic infection and gra1, which detects both acute and chronic infections due to high transcription in tachyzoites and bradyzoites. This RT-qPCR assay was evaluated alongside the mouse bioassay and two molecular methods, 529 bp-specific qPCR and nested ITS-1 PCR, using tissues from experimentally infected piglets and sheep. Cohen's kappa coefficient showed moderate agreement between gra1-bag1 RT-qPCR and the mouse bioassay (κ = 0.557), comparable to 529-qPCR (κ = 0.556). The assay detected gra1 and bag1 transcripts in all bioassay-positive samples, demonstrating high predictive value for viable parasites. The gra1-bag1 RT-qPCR provides a reliable prescreening tool for predicting parasite viability in tissues, supporting ethical research by reducing reliance on the mouse bioassay.
PB Nature Research
YR 2026
FD 2026
LK https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/136774
UL https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/136774
LA eng
NO Largo-de la Torre, A., Velasco-Jiménez, N., Ortega-Mora, L. M., & Regidor-Cerrillo, J. (2026). Development and validation of a gra1-bag1 RT-qPCR assay as an alternative to the mouse bioassay for assessing Toxoplasma gondii viability. Scientific reports, 16(1), 14370. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43786-0
NO Author contributionsJR-C and AL-T conceived the study and participated in its design, and LMO-M obtained the funding. AL-T conducted the experiments. NVJ developed the predictive model and analyzed the associated results. Statistical analyses and result interpretation were performed by AL-T and JR-C. AL-T and JR-C wrote the original draft of the manuscript, while LMO-M reviewed and edited it. All authors contributed to the manuscript revision and have read and approved the final submitted version
NO Comunidad de Madrid
NO European Commission
NO Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades ( España)
DS Docta Complutense
RD 14 jun 2026