RT Conference Proceedings
T1 On the instantiation of argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks
T2 Sobre la instanciación de marcos de argumentación incompletos
A1 Yuste Ginel, Antonio
A1 Proietti, Carlo
A2 Alfano, Gianvincenzo
A2 Ferilli, Stefano
AB Argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks provide an intuitive way of representing uncertainty in argumentative contexts. It is however possible that, taking structured argumentation as a reference point, the general assumptions of these models present the same risks of hasty generalization attributed to some abstract argumentation models, as they do not have a structured counterpart. Here, we focus on a specific instantiation of argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks: rooting the uncertainty about arguments in the uncertainty about the application of ASPIC+-inference rules. We show (Proposition 1) that the abovementioned risk is concrete. Therefore a more fine-grained representation of uncertainty at the abstract level is needed, which we provide with implicative argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks and prove to work (Theorem 1).
SN 1613-0073
YR 2023
FD 2023-11
LK https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/109864
UL https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/109864
LA eng
NO Antonio Yuste-Ginel and Carlo Proietti. On the instantiation of argumentincomplete argumentation frameworks. In G. Alfano and S. Ferilli, editors, 7th Workshop on Advances in Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. CEUR, 2023.
NO This is an improved author version where some flaws spotted after publication have been corrected
DS Docta Complutense
RD 8 abr 2025