RT Conference Proceedings
T1 On the apparent synonymy between two Spanish agentive suffixes: –dor and –nte
A1 Cano Cambronero, María De Los-Ángeles
AB We expect with this study to unveil the differences between these deverbal suffixes and to show that there is not any synonymy and the suffixes are semantically and aspectually specified. We adopt a syntactic approach in order to explain the data. That is, derivatives associated with verbal predicates contain functional projections: AspP, VoiceP, vP, etc. (Marantz 1997, Alexiadou 2001, Borer 2005). In this sense, we expect to show that the different semantic-aspectual interpretations may be determined by the presence of different functional projections.
YR 2012
FD 2012-02-09
LK https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/94219
UL https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/94219
LA eng
NO Referencias bibliográficas:•	Alexiadou, A. (2001): Functional structure in nominals: nominalization and ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.•	Borer, H. (2005): Structuring Sense. Oxford: OUP.•	Laca, B. (1993): “Las nominalizaciones orientadas y los derivados españoles en –dor y –nte”, Varela, S. (ed.), La formación de palabras, Madrid: Taurus.•	Marantz, A. (1997): “No escape from syntax”. UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics, 4: 201-225.•	Rainer, F. (1999): “La derivación adjetival”. Bosque, I. and V. Demonte (dirs.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, v. 3, cap. 70, Madrid: Espasa.•	Rifón, A. (1996-1997): “Sinonimia y polisemia de los sufijos –dor y –nte”. Revista de Lexicografía, III.
NO Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
DS Docta Complutense
RD 27 abr 2025