<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-08T03:27:40Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/105930" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/105930</identifier><datestamp>2025-07-11T15:06:26Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_15</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Comparing rubbing and scrubbing surgical hand antisepsis with propan-1-ol 60% in accordance with European regulation UNE-EN 12791:2016+A1:2018</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Martin Villa, Carlos</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Becerro De Bengoa Vallejo, Ricardo</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Alou Cervera, Luis</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>González Hidalgo, Natalia</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Losa Iglesias, Marta</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Gómez-Lus Centelles, María Luisa</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Sevillano Fernández, David</dc:creator>
   <dc:contributor>Cambridge University Press</dc:contributor>
   <dc:subject>579 Microbiología</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Antisepsis</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Crossover trial</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Surgical site infection</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Microbiología médica</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Enfermedades infecciosas</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>2414 Microbiología</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>A crossover trial was conducted to compare hand rub and hand scrub-brush methods for reducing bacterial loads when using propan-1-ol-60% according to European regulations. Both methods significantly reduced the bacterial load immediately after antisepsis, but only the hand rub method achieved significant bacterial load reduction 3 hours after the procedure.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Depto. de Medicina</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Fac. de Medicina</dc:description>
   <dc:description>TRUE</dc:description>
   <dc:description>pub</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2024-07-10T12:00:43Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2024-07-10T12:00:43Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2021-01-22</dc:date>
   <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
   <dc:type>VoR</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/105930</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>0899-823X</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>1559-6834</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>10.1017/ice.2020.1388</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>Martin-Villa C, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Alou L, González N, Losa-Iglesias M, Gómez-Lus ML, Sevillano D. Comparing rubbing and scrubbing surgical hand antisepsis with propan-1-ol 60% in accordance with European regulation UNE-EN 12791:2016+A1:2018. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;42(11):1382-1384. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.1388</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>restricted access</dc:rights>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
   <dc:publisher>Cambridge University Press</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>