2026-06-08T02:39:03Zhttps://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request

oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/1135312025-03-18T12:46:54Zcom_20.500.14352_14col_20.500.14352_15

Carpena Torres, Carlos Batres Valderas, Laura Serramito Blanco, María Carracedo Rodríguez, Juan Gonzalo 2025-01-09T13:32:40Z 2025-01-09T13:32:40Z 2024-07-02 Carpena-Torres, C.; Batres, L.; Serramito, M.; Carracedo, G. Repeatability of Subjective Refraction in Different Age Groups. Photonics 2024, 11, 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11070634 10.3390/photonics11070634 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/113531 https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11070634 Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the inter-examiner repeatability of subjective refraction across diverse age cohorts, an aspect not previously investigated. Methods: A cross-sectional, randomized study enrolled 86 participants (mean age: 37.0 ± 18.0 years), distributed into three groups: youth, non-presbyopic adults, and presbyopic adults. Each participant underwent three subjective refractions by three different optometrists on separate days. Repeatability analysis encompassed all refractive variables (M, J0, and J45). Results: There were no significant differences between optometrists in all refractive variables for either the overall sample or across age groups (p ≥ 0.05). Additionally, no correlation was found between participants’ age and the mean difference in refractive variables across optometrists (p ≥ 0.05). The 95% confidence interval of repeatability (r) for the total sample was ±0.70 D for M, ±0.29 for J0, and ±0.21 D for J45. Conclusions: Based on these findings and previous research, it is suggested to establish 95% limits of agreement of ±0.75 D for M, and between ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D for both J0 and J45 when validating new refraction systems compared to subjective refraction as the gold standard, regardless of the age of the subjects evaluated. eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ open access Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Repeatability of Subjective Refraction in Different Age Groups journal article