<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-08T05:16:36Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/113531" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/113531</identifier><datestamp>2025-03-18T12:46:54Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_15</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/113531">
      <dc:title>Repeatability of Subjective Refraction in Different Age Groups</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Carpena Torres, Carlos</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Batres Valderas, Laura</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Serramito Blanco, María</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Carracedo Rodríguez, Juan Gonzalo</dc:creator>
      <dc:description>Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the inter-examiner repeatability of subjective refraction across diverse age cohorts, an aspect not previously investigated. Methods: A cross-sectional, randomized study enrolled 86 participants (mean age: 37.0 ± 18.0 years), distributed into three groups: youth, non-presbyopic adults, and presbyopic adults. Each participant underwent three subjective refractions by three different optometrists on separate days. Repeatability analysis encompassed all refractive variables (M, J0, and J45). Results: There were no significant differences between optometrists in all refractive variables for either the overall sample or across age groups (p ≥ 0.05). Additionally, no correlation was found between participants’ age and the mean difference in refractive variables across optometrists (p ≥ 0.05). The 95% confidence interval of repeatability (r) for the total sample was ±0.70 D for M, ±0.29 for J0, and ±0.21 D for J45. Conclusions: Based on these findings and previous research, it is suggested to establish 95% limits of agreement of ±0.75 D for M, and between ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D for both J0 and J45 when validating new refraction systems compared to subjective refraction as the gold standard, regardless of the age of the subjects evaluated.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2025-01-09T13:32:40Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2025-01-09T13:32:40Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2024-07-02</dc:date>
      <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>Carpena-Torres, C.; Batres, L.; Serramito, M.; Carracedo, G. Repeatability of Subjective Refraction in Different Age Groups. Photonics 2024, 11, 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11070634</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.3390/photonics11070634</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/113531</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11070634</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>