<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-01T01:35:08Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/114780" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/114780</identifier><datestamp>2025-03-18T15:42:34Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_15</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Stakeholders' manipulation of Environmental Impact Assessment</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Enríquez de Salamanca Sánchez-Cámara, Álvaro</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>363.7</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>EIA</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Stakeholders</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Bias</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Manipulation</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Medio ambiente natural</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>24 Ciencias de la Vida</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a process where several stakeholders take part, each with different interests, making bias unavoidable and a major cause of concern, but there is a big difference between inherent stakeholders' bias and manipulation, an illegitimate attempt to alter decisions for spurious interests. Although manipulation has usually been attributed to developers, any stakeholder may try to use it for self-benefit. In this paper we analyse manipulation possibilities, and how they can be used by stakeholders. While bias is unavoidable and should be reduced, understood and managed in EIA, manipulation is unacceptable and must be excluded.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España)</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Depto. de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Fac. de Ciencias Biológicas</dc:description>
   <dc:description>TRUE</dc:description>
   <dc:description>pub</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2025-01-16T16:50:57Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2025-01-16T16:50:57Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2017-10-12</dc:date>
   <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
   <dc:type>VoR</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/114780</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>0195-9255</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.003</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>1873-6432</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CTM2014-56668-R/ES/SISTEMAS CATALITICOS POROSOS EN LA SINTESIS DE HETEROCICLOS BIOACTIVOS. ESTUDIO MECANISTICO/</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//AGL2015-69151-R/ES/MORTALIDAD ARBOREA TRAS INCENDIOS: PROCESOS SUBYACENTES Y CONSECUENCIAS PARA LA RECUPERACION Y GESTION DE LOS BOSQUES MEDITERRANEOS/</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>Enríquez-de-Salamanca, Á. (2018). Stakeholders’ manipulation of environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 68, 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.003</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>restricted access</dc:rights>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
   <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>