<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-28T15:00:05Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/120428" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/120428</identifier><datestamp>2025-05-23T00:07:50Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_15</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/120428">
      <dc:title>Vascular catheter colonization: surveillance based on culture of needleless connectors</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Pérez Granda, María Jesús</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Guembe, María</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Cruces, Raquel</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Bouza Santiago, Emilio</dc:creator>
      <dc:description>Background
Superficial culture has a high negative predictive value in the assessment of catheter tip colonization (CC) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (C-RBSI). However, the process of hub culture requires the hubs to be swabbed, and this carries a risk of dislodging the biofilm. At present, most catheter hubs are closed by needleless connectors (NCs) that are periodically replaced. Our objective was to compare the yield of SC (skin + hub culture) with that of skin + NC culture in the assessment of CC and C-RBSI.

Methods
During 5 months, we included the patients on the Major Heart Surgery ICU when a central venous catheter (CVC) remained in place ≥7 days after insertion. SCs were taken simultaneously when the NC was withdrawn and processed by the semi-quantitative method, even when the catheter was not removed. All catheter tips were cultured. All NCs belonging to a single catheter lumen were individually flushed with 100 μl of brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth. We considered the lumen to be colonized when ≥1 NC culture from the lumen flush was positive. We collected a total of 60 catheters.

Results
The overall CC rate was 15.0 %, and we confirmed two episodes of C-RBSI. The validity values after the comparison of SCs with skin + NC culture for prediction of CC were the following: sensitivity 66.7 % vs. 77.8 %, and negative predictive value 93.6 % vs. 93.1 %. The sensitivity and negative predictive value for prediction of C-RBSI was 100 % for both SC and skin + NC culture.

Conclusion
The combination of skin and flushed NC culture can be an alternative to conventional SC for ruling out CC and C-RBSI.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2025-05-22T17:56:39Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2025-05-22T17:56:39Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2016-05-28</dc:date>
      <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>Pérez-Granda MJ, Guembe M, Cruces R, Bouza E. Vascular catheter colonization: Surveillance based on culture of needleless connectors. Critical Care. 2016;20(1).</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>1364-8535</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.1186/s13054-016-1334-1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/120428</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1186/S13054-016-1334-1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-016-1334-1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>BioMed Central Ltd</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>