<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-28T15:16:35Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/12294" metadataPrefix="qdc">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/12294</identifier><datestamp>2025-06-05T14:12:18Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_15</setSpec></header><metadata><qdc:qualifieddc xmlns:qdc="http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Fear connectedness among asset classes</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Andrada-Félix, Julián</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Fernández-Pérez, Adrian</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Sosvilla Rivero, Simón Javier</dc:creator>
   <dcterms:abstract>This study investigates the interconnection between five implied volatility indices representative of different financial markets during the period 1 August 2008–29 December 2017. To this end, we first perform a static and dynamic analysis to measure the total volatility connectedness in the entire period (the system-wide approach) using a framework recently proposed by Diebold and Yilmaz. Second, we make use of a dynamic analysis to evaluate both the net directional connectedness for each market and all net pairwise directional connectedness. Our results suggest that a 38.99%, of the total variance of the forecast errors is explained by shocks across markets, indicating that the remainder 61.01% of the variation is due to idiosyncratic shocks. Furthermore, we find that volatility connectedness varies over time, with a surge during periods of increasing economic and financial instability. Finally, we also document frequently switch between a net volatility transmitter and a net volatility receiver role in the five markets under study.</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:dateAccepted>2023-06-17T12:29:54Z</dcterms:dateAccepted>
   <dcterms:available>2023-06-17T12:29:54Z</dcterms:available>
   <dcterms:created>2023-06-17T12:29:54Z</dcterms:created>
   <dcterms:issued>2018</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/12294</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>1466-4283</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>10.1080/00036846.2018.1441521</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>(ECO2016-76203-C2-2-P)</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>(VRF2016-12)</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>(PR71/15-20229)</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>(PRX16/00261)</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
   <dc:publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</dc:publisher>
</qdc:qualifieddc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>