<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-01T01:26:11Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/129391" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/129391</identifier><datestamp>2025-12-20T01:20:47Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_15</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Documento, fotocopia y falsedad</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Herrero Giménez, Rubén David</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>falsedad en documento</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>fotocopia</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>documento público</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>documento oficial</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>funciones del documento.</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>alsehood in document</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>photocopy</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>public document</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>official document</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>document functions</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Ciencias Sociales</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>56 Ciencias Jurídicas y Derecho</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>A continuación trataremos la cuestión de si la modificación o alteración de la fotocopia de un documento es constitutivo de ilícito penal, y si además, dicha mutación o alteración —de un documento público u oficial— debe ser constitutivo de un delito de falsedad en documento privado, o lo es de un documento público u oficial.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Next we will deal with the question of whether the modification or alteration of a photocopy of a document is  constitutive  of  a  criminal  offense,  and  if  in  addition,  said  mutation  —if  it  is  a  public  or  official  document—  must  constitute a crime of falsification in a document private, or it is from a public or official document.Key words: alsehood in document, photocopy, public document, official document, document functions.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Depto. de Derecho Procesal y Derecho Penal</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Fac. de Derecho</dc:description>
   <dc:description>TRUE</dc:description>
   <dc:description>pub</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2025-12-19T09:16:35Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2025-12-19T09:16:35Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2020-07</dc:date>
   <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
   <dc:type>VoR</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/129391</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>1138-9168</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>spa</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>Giménez, R. H. (2020). Documento, fotocopia y falsedad. Revista penal, (46), 109-126.</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
   <dc:publisher>Tirant lo Blanch</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>