<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-01T17:58:28Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/130189" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/130189</identifier><datestamp>2026-01-20T13:31:40Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_15</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Knowing how to establish intellectualism</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Sgaravatti, Daniele</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Zardini, Elia</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>1</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>165</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Filosofía</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Teoría del conocimiento</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>72 Filosofía</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>7201 Filosofía del Conocimiento</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>Earlier versions of the material in this paper were given in 2007 at the UCLA Epistemology Workshop and at the Arché Knowledge and Language Seminar (University of St Andrews); in 2008, at the Arché Reading Party in Carbost (University of St Andrews) and at a research seminar at the University of Göttingen.
Online publication date: 12 Aug 2008</dc:description>
   <dc:description>In this paper, we present a number of problems for intellectualism about knowl-edge-how, and in particular for the version of the view developed by Stanley &amp; Williamson 2001. Their argument draws on the alleged uniformity of ‘know how’-and ‘know wh’-ascriptions. We offer a series of considerations to the effect that this assimilation is problematic. Firstly, in contrast to ‘know wh’-ascriptions, ‘know how’-ascriptions with known negative answers are false. Secondly, knowledge-how obeys closure principles whose counterparts fail for knowledge-wh and knowledge- that. Thirdly, as opposed to knowledge-wh and knowledge-that, knowledge-how is inferentially isolated from further knowledge-that. We close by providing some evidence against the further reduction of knowledge-wh to knowledge-that, which is presupposed by the intellectualist theory under discussion.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Depto. de Lógica y Filosofía Teórica</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Fac. de Filosofía</dc:description>
   <dc:description>TRUE</dc:description>
   <dc:description>pub</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2026-01-14T12:21:57Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2026-01-14T12:21:57Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2008</dc:date>
   <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
   <dc:type>VoR</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/130189</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>0165-9227</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>1875-6735</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>Sgaravatti, D. y Zardini, E. (2008) «Knowing how to establish intellectualism», Grazer Philosophische Studien, 77(1), pp. 217-261. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1163/18756735-90000849.</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>restricted access</dc:rights>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
   <dc:publisher>Brill</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>