2026-06-28T15:30:45Zhttps://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request

oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/1333012026-02-26T00:55:22Zcom_20.500.14352_14col_20.500.14352_15

Effect of exposure to root canal irrigants on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements. Rebolloso De Barrio, Elena Gancedo Caravia, Lucía García Barbero, Ernesto Pérez-Higueras Sánchez-Escalonilla, Juan Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the push-out bond strength (POBS) of three calcium silicate-based cements (CSBC) after exposure to saline, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and a mixture of NaOCl and etidronic acid (NaOCl+HEBP) in simulated perforation. Materials and methods: A total of 180 dentin slices were perforated and then filled with either Biodentine (BD), ProRoot MTA (PMTA), or Total Fill (TF). After 1 week, specimens in each group were divided into 4 subgroups (n = 15) according to the root canal irrigant (RCI) that their coronal surface was exposed to: saline, 5.25% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, or a mixture of 5.25% NaOCl and 9% HEBP (NaOCl+HEBP). A push-out test was performed, and the failure pattern was assessed. POBS data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests and the failure patterns with chi-square test. Results: No differences were found when comparing the effect of RCI on the POBS of PMTA. BD showed significantly higher POBS values after exposure to NaOCl+HEBP (p < .05), and those of TF were significantly lower after exposure to EDTA (p < .05). No differences in the failure patterns were found among groups. Conclusion: NaOCl+HEBP had no detrimental effect on the POBS of CSBC. Clinical relevance: The mixture of sodium hypochlorite and etidronic acid may be considered as an alternative irrigant when treating root perforations. 2026-02-25T22:55:55Z 2026-02-25T22:55:55Z 2020-10-28 journal article Rebolloso de Barrio E, Gancedo-Caravia L, García-Barbero E, Pérez-Higueras JJ. Effect of exposure to root canal irrigants on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(5):3267-3274. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03658-x 1432-6981 10.1007/s00784-020-03658-x https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/133301 1436-3771 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03658-x 33118077 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00784-020-03658-x https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33118077/ eng restricted access Springer