<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-29T02:43:19Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/135001" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/135001</identifier><datestamp>2026-04-23T23:51:09Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_21</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/135001">
      <dc:title>The case for conventionalism about personhood</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Muñoz Corcuera, Alfonso</dc:creator>
      <dc:contributor>Muñoz Corcuera, Alfonso</dc:contributor>
      <dc:contributor>Wagner, Nils-Frederic</dc:contributor>
      <dc:description>Published December 9, 2025.</dc:description>
      <dc:description>The problem of personhood, as I will understand it in this paper, is the problem of which properties define the class of persons. The standard response to this problem is that to be a person means having certain higher-order psychological capacities. Call this “cognitivism” about personhood. By contrast, conventionalism about personhood claims that to be a person is to occupy a role within certain normative conventions. In this paper, I argue against cognitivism and in favour of conventionalism. To do so, first I present both cognitivism and conventionalism. Second, I introduce two of the strongest arguments for cognitivism. Third, I show that we should reject both arguments. Finally, I conclude that the insights we can get from the discussion support a certain type of conventionalism.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2026-04-23T11:42:26Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2026-04-23T11:42:26Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
      <dc:type>book part</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>Muñoz-Corcuera, A. (2025). The case for conventionalism about personhood. In Muñoz-Corcuera, A. and Wagner, N.-F. (eds.). Conventionalism about personal identity (pp. 73-90). Routledge.</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>9781041083856</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>9781003645122</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.4324/9781003645122</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/135001</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003645122</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003645122-5/case-conventionalism-personhood-alfonso-mu%C3%B1oz-corcuera?context=ubx&amp;refId=72297924-c9c7-4e8f-93ef-b70311a13e70</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://www.routledge.com/Conventionalism-about-Personal-Identity/Munoz-Corcuera-Wagner/p/book/9781041083856</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://produccioncientifica.ucm.es/documentos/694706a2221f004fbfa3be86</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PID2020- 117413GA-I00/ES/INSTITUCION Y CONSTITUCION DE LA INDIVIDUALIDAD: ASPECTOS ONTOLÓGICOS, SOCIALES Y DE DERECHO/INCON</dc:relation>
      <dc:rights>restricted access</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Routledge</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>