<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-07T05:29:12Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/136561" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/136561</identifier><datestamp>2026-05-07T00:00:49Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_15</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>The Stackelberg–Armstrong model</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Sánchez Cartas, Juan Manuel</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>L11</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>L81</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>L13</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Two-sided platforms</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Competition</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Two-sided markets</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Stackelberg</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Economía industrial</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>53 Ciencias Económicas</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>We show that sequential (Stackelberg) competition between two-sided platforms can overturn the price-skewness ranking of the Armstrong (2006) competition benchmark: the side subsidized under simultaneous pricing may become the taxed side under sequential play. The mechanism is that the Stackelberg leader internalizes cross-side feedback through the follower’s best response, which introduces both externalities into each side’s markup and can reverse which side is subsidized. The equilibrium is unique, admits closed-form solutions under standard interiority/concavity conditions, and is directly comparable to Armstrong’s benchmark. Both platforms earn strictly more than under simultaneous play, and we characterize a sharp threshold separating second-mover from first-mover advantage.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Fundación Ramón Areces</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Depto. de Análisis Económico y Economía Cuantitativa</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Fac. de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales (ICEI)</dc:description>
   <dc:description>TRUE</dc:description>
   <dc:description>pub</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2026-05-06T12:47:01Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2026-05-06T12:47:01Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
   <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
   <dc:type>VoR</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/136561</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>0165-1765</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.econlet.2026.113019</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>1873-7374</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>Sanchez-Cartas, J. M. (2026). The stackelberg–armstrong model. Economics Letters, 265, 113019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2026.113019</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
   <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>