<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-08-20T15:41:14Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/27531" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/27531</identifier><datestamp>2023-11-14T07:19:40Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_17</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Bibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Chang, Chia-Lin</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>McAleer, Michael</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>C18</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>C81</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Y10</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Research assessment measures</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Impact factors</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Bibliometric measures.</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Econometría (Economía)</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>5302 Econometría</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>The authors are grateful for the helpful comments and suggestions of the Editor-in-Chief. For financial support, the first author wishes to thank the National Science Council, Taiwan, and the second author acknowledges the Australian Research Council, the National Science Council, Taiwan, and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Virtually all rankings of journals are based on citations, including self citations by journals and individual academics. The gold standard for bibliometric rankings based on citations data is the widely-used Thomson Reuters Web of Science (2014) citations database, which publishes, among others, the celebrated Impact Factor. However, there are numerous bibliometric measures, also known as research assessment measures, based on the Thomson Reuters citations database, but they do not all seem to have been collected in a single source. The purpose of this paper is to present, define and compare the 16 most well-known Thomson Reuters bibliometric measures in a single source. It is important that the existing bibliometric measures be presented in any rankings papers as alternative bibliometric measures based on the Thomson Reuters citations database can and do produce different rankings, as has been documented in a number of papers in the bibliometrics literature.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>National Science Council, Taiwan</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Australian Research Council</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Japan Society for the Promotion of Science</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Fac. de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)</dc:description>
   <dc:description>FALSE</dc:description>
   <dc:description>unpub</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2023-06-18T10:25:32Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2023-06-18T10:25:32Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2015-03</dc:date>
   <dc:type>technical report</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/27531</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>2341-2356</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>Documentos de Trabajo del Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>