<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-08T01:16:58Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/34020" metadataPrefix="qdc">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/34020</identifier><datestamp>2024-10-28T15:23:58Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_15</setSpec></header><metadata><qdc:qualifieddc xmlns:qdc="http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Microtensile bond strength test bias caused by variations in bonded areas</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Macorra García, José Carlos De La</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Pérez-Higueras Sánchez-Escalonilla, Juan</dc:creator>
   <dcterms:abstract>Purpose: While it has been shown that no method produces specimens with exactly the same cross-sectional bonded area (BA), BA variations within and between studies are a well-known covariate in microtensile test results. However, no method has yet been described to accurately acount for its influence. A procedure is presented that allows controlling for variations of BA effects on results. Further, a proposal for reporting is presented which enables resuls of different studies to be compared.

Materials and methods: partially using the results of the report in which the microtensile test was originally described, both general (caused by differences in BA) and specific (due to a material's performance differences and intrinsic biological varibility of specimens) variabilities were separated through linear regression of microtensile (MPa) to BA(mm2) pooled results. Comparing the specific variability of specimens-the residuals to the regression line-of groups allowed assessing differences between groups.

Results: A means comparison of residuals showed that specific differences were significant (t-test, p=0.0004). The null hypothesis could be rejected : materials' performances were different. This could not be determined in the original report, since BA variability was very high. A proposal for reporting of results to facilitate their clinical interpretation and comparison between studies is presented.

Conclusion:Controlling for general variability caused by differences in BA size allows precise comparison of microtensile tests results.</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:dateAccepted>2023-06-19T13:33:43Z</dcterms:dateAccepted>
   <dcterms:available>2023-06-19T13:33:43Z</dcterms:available>
   <dcterms:created>2023-06-19T13:33:43Z</dcterms:created>
   <dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/34020</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>1461-5185</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>10.3290/j.jad.a32068</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>spa</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>Microtensile Bond Strength Test Bias Caused by Variations in Bonded Areas. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2014;16:207–219.</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>restricted access</dc:rights>
   <dc:publisher>Quintessence</dc:publisher>
</qdc:qualifieddc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>