2026-08-23T06:36:42Zhttps://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request
oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/440592024-10-23T15:24:36Zcom_20.500.14352_14col_20.500.14352_15
Docta Complutense author Arias Paniagua, Ana María author Pérez-Higueras Sánchez-Escalonilla, Juan author Macorra García, José Carlos De La 2023-06-20T03:37:09Z 2023-06-20T03:37:09Z 2012 Arias, A.; Perez-Higueras, J. J.; De La Macorra, J. C. Differences in Cyclic Fatigue Resistance at Apical and Coronal Levels of Reciproc and WaveOne New Files. Journal of Endodontics 2012, 38(9), 1244–1248. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.022. 0099-2399 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.022 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/44059 https//doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.022 Introduction: Recent improvements in alloys, kinematics, and concepts have been combined to increase the cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments. The aim of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of new M-Wire reciprocating WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and Reciproc (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) files at 2 levels. Methods: Sixty Reciproc and 60 WaveOne new files were fixed to a specifically designed device and tested in tempered steel canals with a 3-mm radius and a 60° angle of curvature. The motor used was programmed as defined by each manufacturer, and the specific reciprocating motion was followed. Thirty files of each brand were tested at 5 mm, and 30 were tested at 13 mm from their tips. The time to failure was registered. Weibull analysis was used to calculate the mean life, beta, and eta parameters. Results: The probability of the mean life was higher for Reciproc than WaveOne files at both levels, with the probability of the Reciproc mean life being 62% higher than that of WaveOne at 5 mm from the tip and 100% higher at 13 mm (all statistically significant). The probability of the mean life was higher at 5 mm than at 13 mm in both systems. The results may have been partially conditioned by the different motions that manufacturers propose for each system. Conclusions: Reciproc files were more resistant to cyclic fatigue than WaveOne files at both distances from the tip. Both systems had greater cyclic fatigue resistance at 5 mm than at 13 mm from the tip. spa Differences in Cyclic Fatigue Resistance at Apical and Coronal Levels of Reciproc and WaveOne New Files journal article URL https://docta.ucm.es/bitstreams/90a0d975-ee7d-4168-8f81-c7b73b1a4b0d/download File MD5 6fb60b0b9a6c88a0976b92e5ac25a5bc 463243 application/pdf Differences_in_Cyclic_Fatigue_Resistance_at_Apical_and_Coronal_Levels_of_Reciproc_and_WaveOne_New_Files.pdf