<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-08-23T06:36:34Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/44059" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/44059</identifier><datestamp>2024-10-23T15:24:36Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_15</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/44059">
      <dc:title>Differences in Cyclic Fatigue Resistance at Apical and Coronal Levels of Reciproc and WaveOne New Files</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Arias Paniagua, Ana María</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Pérez-Higueras Sánchez-Escalonilla, Juan</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Macorra García, José Carlos De La</dc:creator>
      <dc:description>Introduction: Recent improvements in alloys, kinematics, and concepts have been combined to increase the cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments. The aim of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of new M-Wire reciprocating WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and Reciproc (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) files at 2 levels. 

Methods: Sixty Reciproc and 60 WaveOne new files were fixed to a specifically designed device and tested in tempered steel canals with a 3-mm radius and a 60Â° angle of curvature. The motor used was programmed as defined by each manufacturer, and the specific reciprocating motion was followed. Thirty files of each brand were tested at 5 mm, and 30 were tested at 13 mm from their tips. The time to failure was registered. Weibull analysis was used to calculate the mean life, beta, and eta parameters. 

Results: The probability of the mean life was higher for Reciproc than WaveOne files at both levels, with the probability of the Reciproc mean life being 62% higher than that of WaveOne at 5 mm from the tip and 100% higher at 13 mm (all statistically significant). The probability of the mean life was higher at 5 mm than at 13 mm in both systems. The results may have been partially conditioned by the different motions that manufacturers propose for each system. 

Conclusions: Reciproc files were more resistant to cyclic fatigue than WaveOne files at both distances from the tip. Both systems had greater cyclic fatigue resistance at 5 mm than at 13 mm from the tip.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2023-06-20T03:37:09Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2023-06-20T03:37:09Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2012</dc:date>
      <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>Arias, A.; Perez-Higueras, J. J.; De La Macorra, J. C. Differences in Cyclic Fatigue Resistance at Apical and Coronal Levels of Reciproc and WaveOne New Files. Journal of Endodontics 2012, 38(9), 1244–1248. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.022.</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>0099-2399</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.022</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/44059</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https//doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.022</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>spa</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>