2026-06-07T15:51:25Zhttps://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/requestoai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/449112023-08-27T07:36:06Zcom_20.500.14352_14col_20.500.14352_15
Docta Complutense
author
García Pérez, Miguel Ángel
author
Alcalá Quintana, Rocío
2023-06-20T04:05:59Z
2023-06-20T04:05:59Z
2012
1943-3921
10.3758/s13414-012-0274-3
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/44911
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0274-3
http://link.springer.com/journal/13414
We recently published an article (García-Pérez & Alcalá- Quintana, 2010) reanalyzing data presented by Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and discussing a theoretical argument developed by Ulrich and Vorberg (2009). The purpose of this note is to correct an error in our study that has some theoretical importance, although it does not affect the conclusion that was raised. The error lies in that asymptote parameters reflecting lapses or finger errors should not enter the constraint relating the psychometric functions that describe performance when the comparison stimulus in a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) discrimination task is presented in the first or second interval.
eng
Correction to “Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: A reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009)”
journal article
URL
https://docta.ucm.es/bitstreams/c7da6d6e-bcb6-4863-82a4-bc3159a7efca/download
File
MD5
8cc131dd2637b1c6f3669434ba6db913
410494
application/pdf
Correction to “Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar.pdf