2026-06-07T23:44:57Zhttps://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request

oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/449112023-08-27T07:36:06Zcom_20.500.14352_14col_20.500.14352_15

García Pérez, Miguel Ángel Alcalá Quintana, Rocío 2023-06-20T04:05:59Z 2023-06-20T04:05:59Z 2012 1943-3921 10.3758/s13414-012-0274-3 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/44911 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0274-3 http://link.springer.com/journal/13414 We recently published an article (García-Pérez & Alcalá- Quintana, 2010) reanalyzing data presented by Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and discussing a theoretical argument developed by Ulrich and Vorberg (2009). The purpose of this note is to correct an error in our study that has some theoretical importance, although it does not affect the conclusion that was raised. The error lies in that asymptote parameters reflecting lapses or finger errors should not enter the constraint relating the psychometric functions that describe performance when the comparison stimulus in a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) discrimination task is presented in the first or second interval. eng restricted access Correction to “Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: A reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009)” journal article