2026-06-27T13:53:59Zhttps://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request

oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/492482025-07-07T17:04:18Zcom_20.500.14352_14col_20.500.14352_17

Palacio Vera, Alfonso 2023-06-20T09:17:34Z 2023-06-20T09:17:34Z 2009 2255-5471 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/49248 http://www.ucm.es/centros/webs/fccee/ https://economicasyempresariales.ucm.es/working-papers-ccee We provide a formal definition of the “liquidity trap” (LT) according to which, a LT arises if a combination of high precautionary saving, low investment and stringent conditions for access to bank credit stemming from a high degree of liquidity preference make the sum of the “neutral” interest rate and the expected inflation rate fall short of the term/risk premium on long-term interest rates. We then compare the “New Consensus” (NC) in macroeconomics as expounded in Woodford (2003) and the Post-Keynesian (PK) approach regarding the causes of a LT. We argue that in the NC approach a LT is a phenomenon caused by unusually large transitory shocks that depress the “neutral” interest rate temporarily. By contrast, we argue that in the PK approach an economy may also exhibit a “structural” or long-lasting LT even in the absence of large adverse shocks. Finally, we discuss a number of theoretical issues recently raised in the rapidly growing literature on the LT. eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/ open access Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España Some Reflections on the Theory of the “Liquidity Trap” technical report