<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-30T15:29:46Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/58553" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/58553</identifier><datestamp>2023-08-28T16:38:12Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_15</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Open subgroups and Pontryagin duality</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Banaszczyk, W</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Chasco, M.J.</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Martín Peinador, Elena</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>515.1</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>512.546</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Topología</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>1210 Topología</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>For an abelian topological group G, let G∧ denote the character group of G. The group G is called reflexive if the evaluation map is a topological isomorphism of G onto G∧∧, and G is called strongly reflexive if all closed subgroups and quotient groups of G and G∧ are reflexive. In this paper the authors study the relationship of reflexivity (and strong reflexivity) among G, A, and G/K, where A is an open subgroup and K a compact subgroup of G. Strong reflexivity is closely connected with the notion of strong duality introduced by R. Brown, P. J. Higgins and S. A. Morris [Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 78 (1975), 19–32]. In fact, G is strongly reflexive if and only if the natural homomorphism G∧×G→T is a strong duality. R. Venkataraman [Math. Z. 143 (1975), no. 2, 105–112] originally claimed that if G is reflexive, then so is A. However, his proof includes inaccuracies. The present paper includes a new proof in this regard. In all, the following theorems are proved. Theorem 1: G is reflexive [resp. strongly reflexive] if and only if A is reflexive [resp. strongly reflexive]. Theorem 2: If G admits sufficiently many continuous characters and G/K is reflexive [resp. strongly reflexive], then G is reflexive [resp. strongly reflexive]. Conversely, if G is reflexive and K is dually closed in G, then G/K is reflexive. Theorem 3: Every closed subgroup H and the quotient group G/H of a strongly reflexive group G are strongly reflexive</dc:description>
   <dc:description>D.G.I.C.Y.T.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Depto. de Álgebra, Geometría y Topología</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Fac. de Ciencias Matemáticas</dc:description>
   <dc:description>TRUE</dc:description>
   <dc:description>pub</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2023-06-20T18:46:03Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2023-06-20T18:46:03Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>1994-01</dc:date>
   <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/58553</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>0025-5874</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>10.1007/BF02571709</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>BE91-031</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>restricted access</dc:rights>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
   <dc:publisher>Springer</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>