<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-08T01:04:40Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/60885" metadataPrefix="marc">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/60885</identifier><datestamp>2024-11-25T16:35:34Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_21</setSpec></header><metadata><record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
   <leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
   <datafield ind2=" " ind1=" " tag="042">
      <subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind2=" " ind1=" " tag="720">
      <subfield code="a">Montero De Juan, Francisco Javier</subfield>
      <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind2=" " ind1=" " tag="720">
      <subfield code="a">Mendel, M.</subfield>
      <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind2=" " ind1=" " tag="260">
      <subfield code="c">1997</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind2=" " ind1=" " tag="520">
      <subfield code="a">Everybody in the fuzzy ﬁeld knows about the controversy between Prob-ability and Fuzziness. Some articles are still published from time to time, dicusssing conceptual diiferences and showing comparative analyses or collaborative approaches. In this paper we point out what we think is the main issue, sometimes made obscure because of accompanying complains: a pure Bayesian does not accept the idea of modeling other thing different than acts, which are always crisp. Key words: Fuzzy Sets Theory, Decision</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
      <subfield code="a">80-200-0633-8</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
      <subfield code="a">https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/60885</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
      <subfield code="a">http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/887295</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind2="0" ind1="0" tag="245">
      <subfield code="a">Is it possible the agreement between Bayesian Theory and Fuzzy Sets?</subfield>
   </datafield>
</record></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>