<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-07T23:44:44Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/60885" metadataPrefix="mods">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/60885</identifier><datestamp>2024-11-25T16:35:34Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_21</setSpec></header><metadata><mods:mods xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
   <mods:name>
      <mods:namePart>Montero De Juan, Francisco Javier</mods:namePart>
   </mods:name>
   <mods:name>
      <mods:namePart>Mendel, M.</mods:namePart>
   </mods:name>
   <mods:extension>
      <mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2023-06-20T21:10:26Z</mods:dateAvailable>
   </mods:extension>
   <mods:extension>
      <mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2023-06-20T21:10:26Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
   </mods:extension>
   <mods:originInfo>
      <mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">1997</mods:dateIssued>
   </mods:originInfo>
   <mods:identifier type="isbn">80-200-0633-8</mods:identifier>
   <mods:identifier type="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/60885</mods:identifier>
   <mods:identifier type="officialurl">http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/887295</mods:identifier>
   <mods:abstract>Everybody in the fuzzy ﬁeld knows about the controversy between Prob-ability and Fuzziness. Some articles are still published from time to time, dicusssing conceptual diiferences and showing comparative analyses or collaborative approaches. In this paper we point out what we think is the main issue, sometimes made obscure because of accompanying complains: a pure Bayesian does not accept the idea of modeling other thing different than acts, which are always crisp. Key words: Fuzzy Sets Theory, Decision</mods:abstract>
   <mods:language>
      <mods:languageTerm>eng</mods:languageTerm>
   </mods:language>
   <mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">open access</mods:accessCondition>
   <mods:titleInfo>
      <mods:title>Is it possible the agreement between Bayesian Theory and Fuzzy Sets?</mods:title>
   </mods:titleInfo>
   <mods:genre>book part</mods:genre>
</mods:mods></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>