<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-07-20T01:48:30Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/65464" metadataPrefix="mods">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/65464</identifier><datestamp>2023-09-07T19:56:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_21</setSpec></header><metadata><mods:mods xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
   <mods:name>
      <mods:namePart>Montesinos Amilibia, José María</mods:namePart>
   </mods:name>
   <mods:extension>
      <mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2023-06-21T02:42:58Z</mods:dateAvailable>
   </mods:extension>
   <mods:extension>
      <mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2023-06-21T02:42:58Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
   </mods:extension>
   <mods:originInfo>
      <mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">1977</mods:dateIssued>
   </mods:originInfo>
   <mods:identifier type="isbn">0-12-158860-2</mods:identifier>
   <mods:identifier type="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/65464</mods:identifier>
   <mods:abstract>Let W4=H0∪λH1∪μH2∪γH3∪H4 be a handle decomposition of a closed, orientable PL 4-manifold. Let M4=H0∪λH1∪μH2 and let N4=N4(γ)=γH3∪H4=γ#(S1×B3). Then W4 is M4∪N4, identified along ∂M4=∂N4=γ#(S1×S2). The first observation in this paper is that W4 does not depend upon the method of attaching N4, as a consequence of a theorem of F. Laudenbach and V. Poénaru [Bull. Soc. Math. France 100 (1972), 337–344;], who showed (implicitly) that the homotopy group of ∂N4 is generated by maps which extend to N4. Dually, W4 does not depend upon the method of attaching H0∪λH1≅N4(λ). Hence W4 depends only on the cobordism C(λ,γ) from λ#(S1×S2) to γ#(S1×S2) defined by the 2-handles. The author calls (W4,C(λ,γ)) a Heegaard splitting of W4. The associated Heegaard diagram is a pair (λ#S1×S2,w) where w is a framed link in λ#S1×S2. It is noted that an arbitrary pair (λ#S1×S2,w) need not be a Heegaard diagram for a 4-manifold. 
   Two diagrams are equivalent if there is a homeomorphism of pairs which preserves the framings. Moves are given which relate any two Heegaard diagrams for the same 4-manifold. The completeness of these moves is proved in Theorem 3 (and also Theorem 3′). A concept of a dual diagram is introduced. It is not known whether each Heegaard diagram is geometrically realizable as the diagram for some closed 4-manifold.</mods:abstract>
   <mods:language>
      <mods:languageTerm>eng</mods:languageTerm>
   </mods:language>
   <mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">open access</mods:accessCondition>
   <mods:titleInfo>
      <mods:title>Heegaard diagrams for closed 4-manifolds</mods:title>
   </mods:titleInfo>
   <mods:genre>book part</mods:genre>
</mods:mods></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>