2026-06-27T23:23:45Zhttps://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request

oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/714432023-08-26T22:18:31Zcom_20.500.14352_14col_20.500.14352_15

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Segado Boj, Francisco José author Prieto Gutiérrez, Juan José author Martín Quevedo, Juan author 2022-05-10 The rise of open access (OA) publishing has been followed by the expansion of the Article Publishing Charges (APC) that moves the financial burden of scholarly journal publishing from libraries and readers to authors. We introduce the results of an international randomly selected sampled survey (N = 3,422) that explores attitudes towards this pay to-publish or Gold OA model among scholars. We test the predictor role of age, professional position, discipline, and income-level country in this regard. We found that APCs are perceived more as a global threat to Science than a deterrent to personal professional careers. Academics in low and lower-middle income level countries hold the most unfavourable opinions about the APC system. The less experimental disciplines held more negative perceptions of APC compared to STEM and the Life Sciences. Age and access to external funding stood as negative predictors of refusal to pay to publish. Commitment to OA self-archiving predicted the negative global perception of the APC. We conclude that access to external research funds influences the acceptance and the particular perception of the pay to publish model, remarking the economic dimension of the problem and warning about issues in the inequality between centre and periphery. 0953-1513 10.1002/leap.1455 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/71443 https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1455 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/leap.1455 Attitudes, willingness, and resources to cover article publishing charges: The influence of age, position, income level country, discipline and open access habits