<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-07-18T13:57:49Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/71891" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/71891</identifier><datestamp>2023-08-26T20:33:49Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_15</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/71891">
      <dc:title>Evaluation of Intel's DPC++ Compatibility Tool in heterogeneous computing</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Castaño Roldán, Germán</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Faqir-Rhazoui, Youssef</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>García Sánchez, Carlos</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Prieto Matías, Manuel</dc:creator>
      <dc:description>CRUE-CSIC (Acuerdos Transformativos 2022)</dc:description>
      <dc:description>The Intel DPC++ Compatibility Tool is a component of the Intel oneAPI Base Toolkit. This tool automatically transforms CUDA code into Data Parallel C++ (DPC++), thus assisting in the migration process. DPC++ is an implementation of the programming standard for heterogeneous computing known as SYCL, which unifies the development of parallel applications on CPUs, GPUs or even FPGAs. 
This paper analyzes the DPC++ Compatibility Tool by considering the manual intervention required and the problems encountered while migrating the Rodinia benchmarks. For this suite, this tool achieves an impressive rate of almost 87% for code successfully migrated. Moreover, a comparative study of the performance obtained by the migrated code was carried out, showing a moderate overhead in most of the migrated examples. Finally, a performance comparison on different devices was also performed.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2023-06-22T10:55:20Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2023-06-22T10:55:20Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2022-04-08</dc:date>
      <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>0743-7315</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jpdc.2022.03.017</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/71891</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2022.03.017</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:relation>RTI2018-093684-B-I00 and PID2021-126576NB-I00.</dc:relation>
      <dc:relation>CABAHLA-CM (S2018/TCS-4423)</dc:relation>
      <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>Atribución 3.0 España</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>