<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-04T06:29:07Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/72098" metadataPrefix="qdc">https://docta.ucm.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/72098</identifier><datestamp>2024-09-09T13:26:26Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.14352_14</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.14352_15</setSpec></header><metadata><qdc:qualifieddc xmlns:qdc="http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Microleakage assessment of CAD-CAM Cobalt-Chrome and Zirconia abutments on a conical connection dental implant: A comparative in vitro study</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Molinero Mourelle, Pedro</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Roccuzzo, Andrea</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Yilmaz, Burak</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Lam, Walter Yu Hang</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Pow, Edmond Ho Nang</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Gómez Polo, Miguel Ángel</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Río Highsmith, Jaime Del</dc:creator>
   <dcterms:abstract>Objective: To assess the marginal and bacterial microleakage in zirconia and CADCAM or cast Co-Cr implant abutments. 
Methods: Sixty-four conical connection implants with their respective abutments were divided into four groups (Co-Cr (milled, laser-sintered, and cast) and Zirconia (milled)). All specimens were subjected to a chewing simulation and thermocycling. After aging process, specimens were submerged in a 0.2% methylene blue solution with Porphyromonas gingivalis (P.g) for 48 h. The marginal microleakage was measured using a 40× optical microscopy at the internal part of the implant, and when positive microleakage was observed, a DNA isolation with a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was used. The microbiological assessment was based on colony forming units (CFUs). 
Results: Thirty (47%) implant-abutments presented microleakage and the PCR was performed on those specimens (1 Zirconia, 1 Co-Cr milled, 14 Co-Cr laser-sintered and 14 cast). Seven specimens (1 Co-Cr laser-sintered and six cast) presented values below the PCR detection limit t (&lt;100 CFUs). The lowest CFUs count occurred in the Co-Cr milled group (5.17E+02 CFUs/ml) followed by zirconia (7.70E+03 CFUs/ml). The Co-Cr cast (9.39E+03 CFUs/ml) and laser-sintered (2.4E+05 CFUs/ml) groups had higher bacterial count. The CFU count comparison performed between Co-Cr cast and laser-sintered resulted in a statistically significant differences in favor of Co-CrCL (p&lt;.05).
Conclusions: The abutment material and fabrication technique affected the implantabutment microleakage. Although the CAD-CAM abutments presented favorable results, all tested groups presented microleakage.</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:dateAccepted>2023-06-22T11:05:44Z</dcterms:dateAccepted>
   <dcterms:available>2023-06-22T11:05:44Z</dcterms:available>
   <dcterms:created>2023-06-22T11:05:44Z</dcterms:created>
   <dcterms:issued>2022-07-12</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/72098</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>0905-7161</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>10.1111/clr.13973</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>Molinero Mourelle, P., Roccuzzo, A., Yilmaz, B. et al. «Microleakage Assessment of CAD‐CAM Cobalt‐Chrome and Zirconia Abutments on a Conical Connection Dental Implant: A Comparative in Vitro Study». Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 33, n.o 9, septiembre de 2022, pp. 945-52. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13973.</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España</dc:rights>
   <dc:publisher>Wiley</dc:publisher>
</qdc:qualifieddc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>