Casado Suela, Miguel ÁngelCuevas Tascón, GuillermoCabezas Quintario, María AntoniaDuffort Falco, MercedesVela de la Cruz, LauraBurdaspall Moratilla, AnaTorres Macho, JuanGimeno Aránguez, Margarita MaríaBernal Jorquera, JavierMuñoz Rodríguez, Jorge2025-01-282025-01-282023-03-10Casado‐Suela MA, Cuevas‐Tascón G, Cabezas Quintario MA, Duffort‐Falco M, Vela de la Cruz L, Burdaspall‐Moratilla A, et al. Could We Consider Ultrasound‐Guided Minimally Invasive Autopsy as a Part of <scp>POCUS</scp>? Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine [Internet]. 2023 Mar 10;42(8):1887–92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jum.162100278-42971550-961310.1002/jum.16210https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/116467We present a 3-patient case series that support the use of ultrasound guided minimally invasive autopsy (MIA). This technique has a high diagnostic accuracy in specific clinical settings. It makes easier to diagnose pathologies once the patient has died, avoiding body deformation, with a notable reduction in sample processing time compared to the open autopsy study and, therefore, a shorter overall diagnostic response time. MIA shows some similarities with point of care ultrasound (POCUS), like examination protocols or that they can be performed at the bedside.engAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/journal articlehttps://doi.org/10.1002/jum.1621036896883https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jum.16210https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36896883/open access340.6Minimally invasive autopsyPoint of care ultrasoundPulmonaryinfiltratesCiencias BiomédicasMedicina legal (Medicina)32 Ciencias Médicas