Castillo De Oyague, RaquelRío Highsmith, Jaime DelPreciado Uribe, ArelisLynch, Christopher D.García Minguillán, Gonzalo2023-06-162023-06-162021-12-20Castillo De Oyague, R., Río Highsmith, J., Preciado Uribe, A. et al. «‘Role of the Modulating Factors on the Self-Perceived OHRQoL of Fully Dentate Subjects and Wearers of Screw-Retained and Cement-Retained Implant-Supported FPDs: A Cross-Sectional Study’». Journal of Dentistry, vol. 117, febrero de 2022, p. 103887. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103887.0300-571210.1016/j.jdent.2021.103887https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/4910CRUE-CSIC (Acuerdos Transformativos 2022)Objectives: This research aimed to compare the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) between fully dentate subjects and edentulous patients wearing implant-supported fixed partial dentures (i-FPDs). The clinical conditions of both types of restorations were evaluated. Methods: Participants were assigned to: Group-1 (SR, n = 50): screw-retained i-FPD wearers; Group-2 (CR, n = 50): cement-retained i-FPD wearers; and Group-3 (ND, n = 50): dentate subjects with a healthy natural dentition (controls). Patients answered the OHIP-14sp and QoLIP-10 questionnaires. Data related to sociodemographics, prosthesis features, peri implant status, complications, and subjective evaluations, were compiled. Potential modulators of the OHRQoL and the i-FPDs’ clinical conditions were assessed using non-parametric tests (α= 0.05). Results: ND individuals were the least satisfied (OHIP-14sp; p< 0.001). Both prosthodontic groups reported similar levels of wellbeing, excluding the speaking difficulties, which were lower for SR wearers as shown by both scales (p = 0.001). The most discontented patients (OHIP-14sp) were: women (p = 0.022), under 65 years (p = 0.03), without partner (p< 0.001) and having a crown (p = 0.033). The level of education/schooling also affected the OHIP-14sp scores (p< 0.001). Implant mobility and peri implantitis were more frequent among CR wearers (p-values= 0.008 and 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: The OHRQoL of both prosthodontic groups was comparably higher than that of the dentate subjects, who were the most nonconformist. The self-perceived satisfaction was mainly modulated by sociodemographic factors. Clinical significance: Overall, the retention system did not impact the OHRQoL, prosthetic problems, and subjective evaluations of i-FPD wearers. However, the cementation may increase the risk of peri implant diseases.engAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Españahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/journal articlehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103887open accessOral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL)Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)Quality of Life with Implant Prostheses (QoLIP10)Implant-supported fixed partial dentures (iFPDs)Screw-retained implant-supported prosthesesCement-retained implant-supported prosthesesOdontología (Odontología)Prótesis dental3213.13 Ortodoncia-Estomatología3314.02 Prótesis