Valiati, LeandroFonseca, Pedro Cezar2023-06-192023-06-192014Alonso, Luis Henrique. (2005). El estructuralismo genético y los estilos de vida: consumo, distinción y capital simbólico en la obra de Pierre Bourdieu. La era del consumo. Madrid, siglo XXI. Bourdieu, Pierre. (1996). “Le champ économique”, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales. Vol. 119, pps. 48-66. Bourdieu, Pierre. (2007a). A economia das trocas simbólicas. São Paulo: Perspectivas. Bourdieu, Pierre. (2007b) A distinção: crítica social do julgamento. Porto Alegre: Zouk. Bourdieu, Pierre. (2000). O campo econômico: a dimensão simbólica da dominação. Campinas: Papirus. Canterbury, E.R. (1999). “Thorstein Veblen and The Great Gatsby”, Journal of Economic Issues Vol. 33. N 2, pps. 297-304. Godelier, Maurice. (1979). Racionalidade e irracionalidade na economia. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro. Hodgson, Geoffrey, (2000). “La ubicuidad de los hábitos y las reglas”, Revista de Economía Institucional nº 3, pps. 11-43. Hodgson, Geoffrey, (1998). The Approach of Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 36, pps. 166-192, mar. Hodgson, Geoffrey, (2006). “What are institutions?” Journal of Economics Issues. Vol. XL, n 1, p. 1 - 25, mar. Mauss, Marcel. (1999). Ensaios de Sociologia. São Paulo: Perspectiva. Nelson, Richard y Sampat, Bhaven (2001), “Las instituciones como factor que regula el desempeño económico", Revista de Economía Institucional, nº 5, 17-51. Parks, Tim. Medici (2005). Money: Banking, Metaphysics, and Art in Fifteenthcentury Florence. W. W. Norton & Company. Trigg, Andrew. 2001. “Veblen, Bourdieu and the Conspicuous Consumption”, Journal of Economic Issues Vol. 35, nº 1, pps. 99-114. Veblen, Thorstein. (1983). A teoria da classe ociosa: (um estudo econômico da instituições). São Paulo: Abril Cultural. Veblen, Thorstein. (1898). “Why economics is not an evolutionary science”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 12 . pp. 28-42.2386-576810.5209/rev_IJHE.2014.v1.n2.47727https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/34985This article aims to explore elements of economic thought present in Thorstein Veblen and Pierre Bourdieu from the perspective of the History of Economic Thought. These two authors, from distinct fields of analysis, produced in their theories common analytical tools that may be appropriate to understand the influence of cultural aspects in the economic process, especially when considering the concepts of habits, institutions, symbolic profit, social distinction and conspicuous consumption. In this perspective, the paper proposes to conduct an analysis of the historical and theoretical thinking of these authors, so compared in order to detect the main points of contact in their understanding of how cultural value and its institutions influence patterns of economic consumption within a society.engjournal articlehttp://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/IJHEhttp://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/IJHEopen accessHistory of Economic ThoughtCultural EconomicsInstitutionalism.Historia económica5506.06 Historia de la Economía