Rovira Madrid, Rogelio2023-12-012023-12-012022-06-03Rovira, R. (2022) Does the ontological proof of God’s existence really contain all the probative force of the cosmological argument?: the early criticisms of Kant’s thesis by Flatt, Abel and Eberhard. Kant-Studien, Vol. 113 (Issue 2), pp. 269-298. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2022-20120022-887710.1515/kant-2022-2012https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/91034Shortly after the appearance of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant’s claim that the ontological proof of God’s existence contains all the probative force of the cosmological argument was discussed at great length by J. F. Flatt, J. F. v. Abel and J. A. Eberhard. These early criticisms do not seem to have received the attention they deserve, even though they are extremely relevant, cogent, and difficult to dispute. Regardless of whether their assumptions are accepted, these objections point out certain obscurities and flaws in Kant’s argument, casting doubt, from a logical standpoint, on the success of the main Kantian criticism of the cosmological proof.engAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/journal article1613-1134https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2022-2012/htmlhttps://produccioncientifica.ucm.es/documentos/62c9e6eca405bc00e417e7c4open access211.12-21Ontological proofCosmological proofLogical conversionExistenceAetas kantianaLógica (Filosofía)Ontología72 Filosofía7203.03 Metafísica, Ontología7203.04 Teología Natural