Martínez, Froilán C.Cuesta, José A.Molera, Juan M.Brito López, Ricardo2023-06-202023-06-201995-021063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.51.175https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/58596©1995 The American Physical Society. We want to thank A. Sánchez for a critical reading of the manuscript. We also acknowledge financial support from the Dirección General de Investigación Científica y Técnica (Spain) through Project No. PB92-0248 (F.C.M. and J.M.M.) and Project No. PB91-0378 (J.A.C. and R.B.). R. B. also acknowledges financial support from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (Spain).Deterministic and stochastic cellular automata models available to study two-dimensional traffic fIow are compared in this paper. It is shown that a connection between them can be made only when the infinite time and infinite system limits are taken in the appropriate order. We also stress the crucial importance of the choice of boundary conditions in the deterministic model to obtain bulk properties.engRandom versus deterministic 2-dimensional traffic flow modelsjournal articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.51.175http://pre.aps.orgopen access536AutomatonTermodinámica2213 Termodinámica