González Moure, BorjaKhayat, SaadFernández Acosta, DiegoNavarro Cuéllar, IgnacioMaza Muela, CristinaLópez López, AnaTousidonis Rial, ManuelArenas de Frutos, GemaMartínez Martínez, CarlosAntúnez Conde, RaúlTroise, StefaniaVaira, Luigi AngeloOrabona, Giovanni Dell’AversanaOchandiano Caicoya, SantiagoSalmerón Escobar, José IgnacioNavarro Cuéllar, Carlos2026-03-202026-03-202026-02-26González Moure B, Khayat S, Fernández Acosta D, Navarro Cuéllar I, Maza Muela C, López López A, et al. Beyond Accuracy: Perioperative Efficiency and Institutional Cost Implications of CAD/CAM-Guided Versus Conventional Freehand Fibula Free Flap Reconstruction for Mandibular and Maxillary Defects. JCM 2026;15:1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051778.10.3390/jcm15051778https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/134157Background: Computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology has been increasingly adopted for mandibular and maxillary reconstruction using fibula free flaps. However, its clinical and economic advantages over the conventional freehand technique remain debated. The objective of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes and institutional costs between CAD/CAM-guided and conventional freehand fibula flap reconstructions. Methods: An ambispective observational study was conducted including patients who underwent mandibular or maxillary reconstruction with an osteocutaneous free fibula flap between 2017 and 2024. Reconstructions were performed either using CAD/CAM-guided virtual surgical planning or the conventional freehand technique. Demographic data, perioperative variables, postoperative outcomes, oncologic margin status, transfusion requirements, and total institutional costs were analyzed. Univariate comparisons were performed between groups, and multivariate linear regression models were used to assess the independent association of CAD/CAM guidance with operative time and hospital length of stay. Results: Fifty-one patients were included (25 CAD/CAM-guided and 26 freehand). CAD/CAM-guided reconstruction was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (542.3 ± 65.8 vs. 604.9 ± 79.5 min; p = 0.0036) and a shorter overall hospital stay (19.6 ± 7.2 vs. 30.6 ± 26.2 days; p = 0.047) in univariate analysis. The need for perioperative blood transfusion was significantly lower in the CAD/CAM group. No significant differences were observed in ICU stay, flap failure, reintervention rate, or postoperative hemoglobin decrease. Although margin status did not differ significantly between groups, a higher proportion of negative margins was observed in the CAD/CAM cohort. In multivariate analysis adjusting for age and perioperative variables, CAD/CAM guidance remained independently associated with reduced operative time, but not with hospital length of stay. Despite higher upfront planning costs, total per-patient cost was lower in the CAD/CAM group due to improved perioperative efficiency. Conclusions: CAD/CAM-guided fibula free flap reconstruction is a safe and effective technique that is associated with reduced operative time and lower transfusion requirements while maintaining comparable oncologic outcomes. When perioperative efficiency gains are achieved, these advantages may offset the higher planning costs, resulting in overall cost savings at the institutional level. CAD/CAM-assisted reconstruction may therefore be particularly advantageous in high-volume oncologic centers and anatomically complex cases.engAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/journal articlehttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051778https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/5/1778open accessFibula free flapMandibular reconstructionVirtual surgical planningPerioperative efficiencyCost analysisValue-based surgeryValue-based surgeryCirugía bucofacial3213 Cirugía