d'Orey Roquete, MaríaSáez Suanes, Gema PilarÁlvarez Couto, MaríaHofmann, Stephan G.2024-04-122024-04-122023-07-28Roquete, M. d., Sáez-Suanes, G. P., Álvarez-Couto, M., & Hofmann, S. G. (2023). A Spanish adaptation and validation of the Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Environment and Social Psychology, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.54517/ESP.V8I2.16972424-89752424-797910.54517/esp.v8i2.1697https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/103033Dr. Hofmann receives financial support by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (as part of the Alexander von Humboldt Professor), the Hessische Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst (as part of the LOEWE Spitzen Professor), NIH/NIMH R01MH128377, NIH/NIMHU01MH108168, Broderick Foundation/MIT, and the James S. McDonnell Foundation 21st Century Science Initiative in Understanding Human Cognition—Special Initiative. He receives compensation for his work as editor from Springer Nature. He also receives royalties and payments for his work from various publishers. Referencias bibliográficas: • 1. Gross JJ, Jazaieri H. Emotion, emotion regulation, and psychopathology: An affective science perspective. Clinical Psychological Science 2014; 2(4): 387-401. doi: 10.1177/2167702614536164 • 2. Husain W, Inam A, Wasif S, Zaman S. Emotional intelligence: Emotional expression and emotional regulation for intrinsic and extrinsic emotional satisfaction. Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2022; 15: 39013913. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S396469 • 3. Gross J. The extended process model of emotion regulation: Elaborations, applications, and future directions. Psychological Inquiry 2015; 26(1): 130-137. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2015.989751 • 4. Barthel AL, Hay A, Doan SN, Hofmann SG. Interpersonal emotion regulation: A review of social and developmental components. Behaviour Change 2018; 35(4): 203-216. doi: 10.1017/bec.2018.19 • 5. Hofmann SG. Interpersonal emotion regulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2014; 38(5): 483-492. doi: 10.1007/s10608-014-9620-1 • 6. Zaki J, Williams WC. Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion 2013; 13(5): 803-810. doi: 10.1037/a0033839 • 7. Bonanno GA, Burton CL. Regulatory flexibility: An individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science 2013; 8(6): 591-612. doi: 10.1177/1745691613504116 • 8. Butler EA, Lee TL, Gross JJ. Emotion regulation and culture: Are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific? Emotion 2007; 7(1): 30-48. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.30 • 9. Matsumoto D, Yoo SH, Nakagawa S, et al. Culture, emotion regulation, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008; 94(6): 925-937. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.925 • 10. Ford BQ, Mauss IB. Culture and emotion regulation. Current Opinion in Psychology 2015; 3: 1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.004 • 11. Soto JA, Perez CR, Kim YH, et al. Is expressive suppression always associated with poorer psychological functioning? A cross-cultural comparison between European Americans and Hong Kong Chinese. Emotion 2011; 11(6): 1450-1455. doi: 10.1037/a0023340 • 12. Wei M, Su JC, Carrera S, et al. Suppression and interpersonal harmony: A cross-cultural comparison between Chinese and European Americans. Journal of Counseling Psychology 2013; 60(4): 625-633. doi: 10.1037/a0033413 • 13. Doré BP, Weber J, Ochsner KN. Neural predictors of decisions to cognitively control emotion. The Journal of Neuroscience 2017; 37(10): 2580-2588. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2526-16.2016 • 14. Hofmann SG, Carpenter JK, Curtiss J. Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ): Scale development and psychometric characteristics. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2016; 40(3): 341-356. doi: 10.1007/s10608-016-9756-2 • 15. Reeck C, Ames DR, Ochsner KN. The social regulation of emotion: An integrative, cross-disciplinary model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2016; 20(1): 47-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.003 • 16. Williams WC, Morelli SA, Ong DC, Zaki J. Interpersonal emotion regulation: Implications for affiliation, perceived support, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2018; 115(2): 224254. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000132 • 17. Dixon-Gordon KL, Haliczer LA, Conkey LC, Whalen DJ. Difficulties in interpersonal emotion regulation: Initial development and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 2018; 40(3): 528-549. doi: 10.1007/s10862-018-9647-9 • 18. Okwuduba EN, Nwosu KC, Okigbo EC, et al. Impact of intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional intelligence and self-directed learning on academic performance among pre-university science students. Heliyon 2021; 7(3): e06611. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06611 • 19. Thomas CL, Allen K. Driving engagement: Investigating the influence of emotional intelligence and academic buoyancy on student engagement. Journal of Further and Higher Education 2020; 45(1): 107-119. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2020.1741520 • 20. Collins PY. What is global mental health? World Psychiatry 2020; 19(3): 265-266. doi: 10.1002/wps.20728 • 21. Blewitt C, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Nolan A, et al. Social and emotional learning associated with universal curriculum-based interventions in early childhood education and care centers: A systematic review and metaanalysis. JAMA Network Open 2018; 1(8): e185727. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5727 • 22. Corcoran RP, Cheung ACK, Kim E, Xie C. Effective universal school-based social and emotional learning programs for improving academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Educational Research Review 2018; 25: 56-72. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.12.001 • 23. Abasi I, Hofmann SG, Kamjou S, et al. Psychometric properties of interpersonal emotion regulation questionnaire in nonclinical and clinical population in Iran. Current Psychology 2023; 42: 8356-8366. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02191-8 • 24. Koç MS, Aka BT, Doğruyol B, et al. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 2019; 41: 294-303. doi: 10.1007/s10862-019-09732-3 • 25. Lotfi M, Shiasy Y, Amini M, et al. Investigating psychometric properties of Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ) in university students. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences 2020; 30(185): 74-85. • 26. Messina I, Spataro P, Grecucci A, et al. Interpersonal emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric properties of the Italian version and associations with psychopathology. Research in Psychotherapy 2022; 25(2): 616. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2022.616 • 27. Ray-Yol E, Yedidağ E, Söğüt-Kahramanla M, et al. Psychometric properties of interpersonal emotion regulation questionnaire in Turkish adolescents. Current Psychology 2022. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-04186-5 • 28. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed. Guilford Press; 2010. • 29. International Business Machines Corporation. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. International Business Machines Corporation; 2019. • 30. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16(3): 297-334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555 • 31. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson-Prentice Hall; 2006. • 32. Hu L, Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods 1998; 3(4): 424-453. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424 • 33. Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, 3rd ed. Routledge; 2016. • 34. Brooke PP, Russell D, Price JL. Discriminant validation of measures of job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology 1998; 73(2): 139-145. doi: 10.1037/00219010.73.2.139 • 35.Marroquín B. Interpersonal emotion regulation as a mechanism of social support in depression. Clinical Psychology Review 2011; 31(8): 1276-1290. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.09.005 • 36. Pagerols M, Prat R, Rivas C, et al. The impact of psychopathology on academic performance in school-age children and adolescents. Scientific Reports 2022; 12(1): 4291. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08242-9 • 37. Sarisoy-Aksüt G, Gençöz T. Psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ) in Turkish samples. Current Psychology 2022; 41: 563-572. doi: 10.1007/s12144-019-00578-2sIntrapersonal Emotion Regulation is a widely studied and recognized term as an essential variable in people’s well-being, and their optimal psychosocial functioning. It has not been until recent years that Interpersonal Emotion Regulation (IER) has been taken into account in studies focused on emotional life and academic performance. The Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ) is one of the few self-report instruments designed for the evaluation of this construct. As far as we know, there is no tool that evaluates this variable in the Spanish language. The present study aims to adapt and validate the IERQ in the Spanish population (n = 289). Maintaining the internal structure of the original scale, it has been found that the Spanish version of the IERQ (IERQ-S) is a valid instrument for the evaluation of IER in the Spanish population.engAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationaljournal articlehttps://esp.apacsci.com/index.php/esp/article/view/1697https://produccioncientifica.ucm.es/documentos/64fffb94ab53484a600232a9https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85169433444&origin=resultslistopen access316.637.01337.015.337.035Social behaviorsEmotional regulationValidationEmotional and social competencyPsicología social (Psicología)Educación socialPsicología de la educación (Educación)6114.04 Psicología Comunitaria58 Pedagogía