Coronado Martín, Pluvio JesúsRychlik, AgnieszkaBaquedano, LauraGarcía Pineda, VirginiaMartínez Maestre, Maria A.Querleu, DenisZapardiel, Ignacio2023-06-222023-06-222022-02-212072-669410.3390/cancers14041081https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/73367(1) Background: This study aimed to analyze the impact of surgical approach on survival rates in women diagnosed with endometrial cancer. (2) Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort of 1382 women diagnosed with EC was performed. A total of 684 (49.5%) women underwent minimally invasive surgery, 233 (34%) underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL), 451 (66%) underwent conventional laparoscopy (LPS), and 698 (50.5%) underwent open surgery (OP). Sociodemographic features, tumor characteristics, and survival rates were analyzed in the whole sample and in a matched-pair model. (3) Results: Women operated on by OP were significantly older, presented more comorbidities, and had more aggressive tumors. Disease-free (DFS), overall (OS), and specific survival related to EC (SS) amounts were significantly higher for MIS compared to OP (p < 0.001). When matched by age, body mass index, comorbidities, ASA score, histological type, grade, myometrial invasion, and FIGO stage, 798 patients were selected. DFS, OS, and SS amounts were similar between the MIS and OP groups. (4) Conclusions: The surgical approach for women with EC does not impact DFS or OS amounts when matched by homogeneous groups.engAtribución 3.0 Españajournal articlehttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041081https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/4/1081open access616-006.04611.664618.1Endometrial carcinomaSurvivalRobotic-assisted laparoscopyLaparoscopyLaparotomyMorbidityOpen approachMedicinaGinecología y obstetriciaOncología32 Ciencias Médicas3201.08 Ginecología3201.01 Oncología