de Castro-Pardo, MónicaPérez-Rodríguez, Fernando2023-06-182023-06-182017[1] M de Castro, and V Urios, "A critical review of multi-criteria decision making in Protected areas", Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 16 (2), 2016, pp-89-109. [2] A Sen, Development as freedom Oxford Paperbacks. 2001. [3] S Greco, J Figueira, and M Eh Multiple criteria decision analysis . Springer's International series. Springer, New York, 2005. [4] J Ananda, and G Herath, -criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and cal economics, 68(10), 2009, pp. 2535-2548. [5] GA Mendoza, and H Martins -criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling ecology and management, 230(1), 2006, pp. 1-22. [6] L Diaz-Balteiro, J González-Pachón, and C Romero, Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 2017, pp. 607-616. [7] J Ananda, est Environmental Management, 39(4), 2007, pp. 534-544. [8] E Nordstrom, LO Eriksson, and K Ohman, Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a Forest Policy and Economics 12, 2010, pp. 562-574. [9] TL Saaty The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Planning priority setting, resource allocation New York: McGraw-Hill. 1980. [10] O S Vaidya, and S Kumar, Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications European Journal of operational research, 169(1), 2006, pp. 1-29. [11] D Schmoldt, J Kangas, G A Mendoza, and Pesonen, M. (Eds.). The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making Vol. 3. Springer Science & Business Media. 2013. [12] F Pérez-Rodríguez, and A Rojo-Alboreca, The triangle assessment method: A new procedure for eliciting expert judgement Expert Systems with Applications, 72, 2017, pp. 139-150. [13] CA Bana e Costa, and JC Vansnick, A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP European Journal of Operational Research, 187, 2008, pp. 1422 1428. [14] Multiple criteria decision support in forest management the approach, methods applied, and experiences gained Forest ecology and management, 207(1), 2005, pp. 133-143. [15] A Kangas, S Laukkanen, and J Kangas, Social choice theory and its applications in sustainable forest management Forest Policy and economics, 9(1), 2006, pp. 77-92. [16] TL Saaty Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic European Journal of Operational Research, 168(2), 2006, pp. 557-570. [17] TL Saaty How to make a decision: European journal of operational research, 48(1), 1990, pp. 9-26. [18] J González-Pachón, and C Romero, A method for dealing with inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons European Journal of Operational Research, 158(2), 2004, pp. 351-361. [19] MB Menezes, GJ da Silveira, and Z Drezner Democratic elections and centralized decisions: Condorcet and Approval Voting compared with Median and Coverage locations European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 2016, pp. 195-203. [20] JG Lapresta, BL Rodríguez, and MM Panero Generalización de la regla de votación de borda mediante el uso de preferencias lingüísticas: análisis de sus propiedades . 27 Congreso Nacional de Estadística e Investigación Operativa. Lleida, 8-11 de abril de 2003. [21] JC Azevedo, C Moreira, JP Castro, and C Loureiro, Agriculture abandonment, land-use change and fire hazard in mountain landscapes In Landscape Ecology in Forest Management and Conservation: Challenges and Solutions for Global Change, Li, C. Lafortezza, R. Chen J. Eds. HEP-Springer, Beijing 2011, pp. 329 351. [22] P M Fernandes, C Loureiro, M Magalhães, P Ferreira, and M- Fernandes M. Fuel age, weather and burn probability in Portugal International Journal of Wildland Fire 2012, 21(4), pp. 380-384 [23] C Moreira, JP Castro, and J Azevedo, Landscape change in a mountainous area in Northeastern Portugal: implications for management WSEAS International Conference on Urban Planning And Transportation (UPT'07), Heraklion, Crete Island, Greece, July 22- 24, 2008. [24] A Lopez Ornat, A Pons and M Noguera Utilizacion de las categorias de gestión de areas protegidas de UICN en la region mediterranea . Consejeria de Medio Ambiente de la Junta de Andalucia, Sevilla, Espana y UICN, Gland, Suiza y Malaga, Espana. 2007. 211 pp.https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/19721En este trabajo se evalúa la priorización, y su robustez, de siete objetivos de gestión del Parque Natural de Montesinho mediante la utilización del método de las jerarquías analíticas (AHP). Para ello se ha realizado una encuesta a 21 estudiantes y profesores de titulaciones agrarias y forestales del Instituto Politécnico de Bragança. Además se comparan las valoraciones obtenidas con AHP y con un método de votaciones. Los resultados muestran que los objetivos de gestión más relevantes para este parque natural son los de Biodiversidad y Uso sostenible.spaconference paperopen accessAHPVotingReversibilityManagementMontesinho Natural Park.EstadísticaInvestigación operativa (Estadística)1209 Estadística1207 Investigación Operativa